Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Intel Core i7-9700K

AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 4900HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS is a mobile SoC for big laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4900HS integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.3 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in the modern 7 nm process at TSMC and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips

According to our information, the Ryzen 9 4900HS is only slightly faster than the Ryzen 7 4800HS. The CPU is clocked 100 MHz (base and boost) higher, but the gains greatly depend on the cooling and TDP settings. Compared to Intel chips, the i9-9980HK top model should be comparable. That means the Ryzen 9 4900HS should be able to handle all demanding tasks and gaming. Compared to the similar named 45W-version, the Ryzen 9 4900H, the 4900HS is differs in 100 MHz boost and 300 MHz base clock.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 7 integrated graphics card with most likely 7 CUs. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 35 Watt (default). That means the chip is intended for big and relatively heavy laptops. The Ryzen 7 4900HS is the 35 Watt version of the R9 4900H with a 10 Watt lower TDP.

Intel Core i7-9700K

► remove from comparison Intel i7-9700K

The Intel Core i7-9700K is a high end desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. It offers an open multiplicator for easy overclocking and integrates 8 cores (no Hyperthreading therefore also 8 threads) clocked at 3.6 - 4.9 GHz and it needs a new Z390 based mainboard.

Thanks to the two additional cores, the performance in multi-threaded applications is even better than the old Core i8-8700K with 6 cores and Hyperthreading. As a high end desktop CPU, the i9-9700K is suited even for very demanding applications and perfect for 3D gaming.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at up to 1.2 GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

Intel specifies the TDP at 95 Watt, so if the CPU is used in laptops a big and chunky cooling system is needed to avoid throttling and lower clock speeds under sustained loads. When overclocking the CPU, the power consumption can easily rise up to 200 Watt and higher.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 4900HSIntel Core i7-9700K
CodenameRenoir (Zen 2)Coffee Lake-R
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Intel Coffee Lake
Clock3000 - 4300 MHz3600 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
L3 Cache8 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 168 / 8
TDP35 Watt95 Watt
Technology7 nm14++ nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketFP6FCLGA1151
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
Intel Core i9-9900KS compare4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K « 3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700 compare3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T compare2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F compare2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Die Size178 mm2
$385 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 4900HS
31.5 pt (52%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
495 Points (54%)
475 Points (52%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4288 Points (10%)
3250 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1863 Points (12%)
min: 1433     avg: 1449     median: 1449 (9%)     max: 1465 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
193 Points (53%)
min: 203     avg: 205.5     median: 205.5 (57%)     max: 208 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
18.2 Points (24%)
15.8 Points (20%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (53%)
2.4 Points (56%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5866 Points (35%)
min: 7624     avg: 7653     median: 7653 (46%)     max: 7682 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
37938 Points (27%)
min: 42677     avg: 42778     median: 42777.5 (31%)     max: 42878 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
53600 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9774 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
88.2 s (1%)
120.5 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.3 s (1%)
4.5 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4548 Points (7%)
7396 Points (12%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
48577 MIPS (28%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4634 MIPS (55%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
106 fps (3%)
94.8 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
223 fps (6%)
270 fps (7%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
12.2 fps (21%)
13 fps (23%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (35%)
0.8 GB/s (23%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.9 GB/s (33%)
1.3 GB/s (22%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.2 GB/s (29%)
8.1 GB/s (21%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
297 Seconds (2%)
307 Seconds (2%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12448 Points (26%)
min: 12844     avg: 13016     median: 12928 (28%)     max: 13447 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.5 s (2%)
7.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
21.8 s (1%)
17.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
547 s (2%)
421.1 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
57045 Points (44%)
min: 53605     avg: 54313     median: 54484 (42%)     max: 54680 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
15184 Points (37%)
min: 14489     avg: 15025     median: 14657 (36%)     max: 16091 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63010 Points (51%)
min: 81711     avg: 82658     median: 82294 (67%)     max: 83908 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
62786 Points (51%)
min: 83615     avg: 83781     median: 83781 (68%)     max: 83947 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
67850 Points (54%)
min: 81896     avg: 84164     median: 84164 (68%)     max: 86432 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
15900 Points (40%)
min: 12856     avg: 13012     median: 13018 (33%)     max: 13171 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
21873 Points (39%)
min: 18241     avg: 18437     median: 18332 (33%)     max: 18780 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
8966 Points (38%)
min: 7736     avg: 7954     median: 7875 (33%)     max: 8349 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1602 Points (37%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
7402 Points (29%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1218 Points (41%)
1300 Points (44%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
7675 Points (14%)
7440 Points (13%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5372 Points (54%)
min: 5925     avg: 5984     median: 5984 (60%)     max: 6043 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
30230 Points (30%)
min: 28792     avg: 29226     median: 29225.5 (29%)     max: 29659 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5744 Points (63%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
26471 Points (35%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
27774 Points (49%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
4825 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
894 ms (1%)
948 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
38616 Points (26%)
41962 Points (28%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
104.2 Watt (18%)
222.4 Watt (38%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
104.5 Watt (19%)
202.6 Watt (37%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
17.8 Points per Watt (13%)
7.1 Points per Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS → 100% n=36

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-9700K → 101% n=36

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 31. 12:08:15

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11882 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11116 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1761908895s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 31 Oct 2025 05:18:25 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11882 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 11882 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11116 +0.001s ... 0.016s

#10 got single benchmarks 11116 +0.007s ... 0.023s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.037s ... 0.059s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.061s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)