Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Intel Core i7-8700

AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 4900HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS is a mobile SoC for big laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4900HS integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.3 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in the modern 7 nm process at TSMC and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips

According to our information, the Ryzen 9 4900HS is only slightly faster than the Ryzen 7 4800HS. The CPU is clocked 100 MHz (base and boost) higher, but the gains greatly depend on the cooling and TDP settings. Compared to Intel chips, the i9-9980HK top model should be comparable. That means the Ryzen 9 4900HS should be able to handle all demanding tasks and gaming. Compared to the similar named 45W-version, the Ryzen 9 4900H, the 4900HS is differs in 100 MHz boost and 300 MHz base clock.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 7 integrated graphics card with most likely 7 CUs. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 35 Watt (default). That means the chip is intended for big and relatively heavy laptops. The Ryzen 7 4900HS is the 35 Watt version of the R9 4900H with a 10 Watt lower TDP.

Intel Core i7-8700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8700

The Intel Core i7-8700 is a high-end desktop processor with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in September 2017. The processor clocks at between 3.2 and 4.6 GHz and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the slightly higher clocked Core i7-8700K, the i7-8700 offers a lower TDP and no unlocked multiplier (no easy overclocking).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to the previous quad-core Kaby Lake models. Single-core performance has not improved much. As a high-end model, the i7-8700 is suitable for the most demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The build is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 65 watts. Therefore, well-dimensioned cooling systems should easily manage to deal with the created heat. We expect increased efficiency due to the higher performance.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 4900HSIntel Core i7-8700
CodenameRenoir (Zen 2)Coffee Lake-S
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Intel Coffee Lake
Clock3000 - 4300 MHz3200 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB384 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache8 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 166 / 12
TDP35 Watt65 Watt
Technology7 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketFP6FCLGA1151
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDual-Channel DDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-S
Intel Core i7-8086K compare3.7 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700K compare3.7 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700 « 3.2 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8600K compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500 compare3 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400 compare2.8 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500T compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 4900HS
31.5 pt (52%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
495 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4288 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1863 Points (12%)
min: 1167     avg: 1194     median: 1199 (8%)     max: 1215 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
193 Points (53%)
min: 190     avg: 193     median: 192 (53%)     max: 197 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
18.2 Points (24%)
min: 12.9     avg: 13     median: 13 (17%)     max: 13.04 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (53%)
min: 2.16     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (52%)     max: 2.18 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5866 Points (35%)
min: 6992     avg: 7140     median: 7171 (43%)     max: 7257 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
37938 Points (27%)
min: 34532     avg: 36153     median: 35384 (26%)     max: 38543 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 i7-8700 +
43704 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 i7-8700 +
9187 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
88.2 s (1%)
min: 143.7     avg: 198.4     median: 198.4 (2%)     max: 253.1 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.3 s (1%)
min: 5.469     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 8.061 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4548 Points (7%)
min: 5912     avg: 6252     median: 6332 (10%)     max: 6511 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
48577 MIPS (28%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4634 MIPS (55%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
106 fps (3%)
min: 70.9     avg: 75.7     median: 75.2 (2%)     max: 81.1 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
223 fps (6%)
min: 221.6     avg: 230.6     median: 234.6 (6%)     max: 235.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
12.2 fps (21%)
9.5 fps (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (35%)
min: 0.74     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (23%)     max: 0.822 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.9 GB/s (33%)
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (22%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.2 GB/s (29%)
min: 7.2     avg: 7.5     median: 7.7 (20%)     max: 7.7 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
297 Seconds (2%)
388.2 Seconds (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12448 Points (26%)
min: 8738     avg: 10526     median: 11193 (24%)     max: 11646 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.5 s (2%)
min: 8.126     avg: 8.3     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.4 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
21.8 s (1%)
min: 18.11     avg: 18.4     median: 18.5 (1%)     max: 18.6 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
547 s (2%)
min: 460.1     avg: 469.3     median: 472.2 (2%)     max: 475.7 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
57045 Points (44%)
45569 Points (35%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
15184 Points (37%)
min: 13159     avg: 13302     median: 13310 (33%)     max: 13436 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63010 Points (51%)
64904 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
62786 Points (51%)
64897 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
67850 Points (54%)
63875 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
15900 Points (40%)
min: 11130     avg: 11692     median: 11885 (30%)     max: 12060 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
21873 Points (39%)
min: 16818     avg: 17487     median: 17458 (31%)     max: 18184 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
8966 Points (38%)
min: 6755     avg: 6874     median: 6873.5 (29%)     max: 6992 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1602 Points (39%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
7402 Points (29%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1218 Points (46%)
1170 Points (44%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
7675 Points (14%)
6250 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5372 Points (54%)
5565 Points (56%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
30230 Points (30%)
23220 Points (23%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i7-8700 +
min: 21806     avg: 23062     median: 23061.5 (41%)     max: 24317 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i7-8700 +
min: 4484     avg: 4486     median: 4486 (59%)     max: 4488 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i7-8700 +
min: 22753     avg: 23926     median: 23925.5 (37%)     max: 25098 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i7-8700 +
min: 4703     avg: 4709     median: 4708.5 (71%)     max: 4714 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
894 ms (1%)
986 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 i7-8700 +
64.5 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
38616 Points (28%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
104.2 Watt (18%)
112.3 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
104.5 Watt (19%)
112.8 Watt (21%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
17.8 Points per Watt (13%)
10.6 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS → 100% n=33

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8700 → 88% n=33

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 04. 10:03:10

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11882 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9932 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759564990s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 Oct 2025 05:18:30 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11882 +0.003s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 11882 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9932 +0.001s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 9932 +0.005s ... 0.02s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.034s ... 0.054s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.055s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)