Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3580U

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

► remove from comparison AMD R7 2700

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700 is an eight-core desktop processor that can handle sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT). This technology is equivalent to Intel's Hyper-Threading. Launched in April 2018, the Ryzen 7 2700 is the second fastest Ryzen 7 processor and is much more economical than its flagship sibling. The Ryzen 7 2700 has a 65 W TDP, which is nearly 50% more efficient than the 105 W TDP Ryzen 7 2700 X. This energy efficiency comes at a cost to performance though.

The Ryzen 7 2700 has a base clock speed of 3.2 GHz, which can be boosted by Extended Frequency Range (XFR) up to 4.1 GHz. The power gain is still high in multi-threaded applications, although this is some way off the Ryzen 7 2700X. The Ryzen 7 2700 benefits from AMD's new Zen+ architecture, with a greater number of instructions per cycle (IPC) and higher clock speeds than last year's Zen chips. The Ryzen 7 2700's eight cores are divided into two clusters that are connected by Infinity Fabric, a subset of HyperTransport. Each cluster has its own L3 cache.

The Ryzen 7 2700 has good performance in games. However, if it is operating at a lower base clock because of low TDP, then the Ryzen 7 2700 falls behind the Ryzen 5 2600 in gaming benchmarks. This behaviour could be because many games currently lack multi-core support. Hence, games rely more on clock speed more than core count.

Detailed information, benchmarks and values can be found in our review of the Ryzen 7 2700.

AMD Ryzen 5 3580U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 3580U

The AMD Ryzen 5 3580U, a Microsoft Surface Edition chip, is a mobile SoC that was announced in October 2019 as part of the Surface Book 15. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.2 - 3.8 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 9 graphics adapter with 9 CUs (576 Shaders) clocked at up to 1300 MHz. Compared to the similar Ryzen 5 3500U, the 3580 integrates a faster GPU with 9 instead of 8 CUs.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Performance

The average 3580U in our extensive database is in the same league as the Core i5-1035G7 and also the Core i7-10510U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a fairly decent result, as of mid 2021.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop manufacturers - or should we say, Microsoft - are allowed to change to anything between 12 W and 35 W with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. Those values are not low enough to allow for fan-free designs, for better or worse.

The CPU is built with a fairly old, as of late 2022, 12 nm process for lower-than-average energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 2700AMD Ryzen 5 3580U
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenameZen+Picasso-U (Zen+)
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Picasso-U (Zen+)
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X compare3.7 - 4.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 « 3.2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U « 2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
Clock3200 - 4100 MHz2100 - 3700 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
L3 Cache16 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 164 / 8
TDP65 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4940 Million4500 Million
Technology12 nm12 nm
Die Size213 mm2
SocketAM4 (1331)FP5
FeaturesSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
Architecturex86x86
$299 U.S.
Announced
L1 Cache384 KB
max. Temp.105 °C
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 9 ( - 1300 MHz)
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 3580U
26.2 pt (36%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
352 Points (39%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1549 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1551 Points (10%)
693 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
161 Points (48%)
139 Points (42%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
16.7 Points (22%)
7.8 Points (10%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.8 Points (44%)
1.7 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4505 Points (27%)
4525 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
31385 Points (23%)
18307 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 R7 2700 +
49441 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 R7 2700 +
7756 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
130.5 s (2%)
274.7 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
5.1 s (1%)
7.2 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4440 Points (7%)
2924 Points (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
15209 MIPS (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3572 MIPS (43%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
89.7 fps (31%)
40.1 fps (14%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
195.7 fps (45%)
135.3 fps (31%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
9.5 fps (17%)
4.1 fps (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.9 GB/s (0%)
0.4 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.4 GB/s (24%)
0.6 GB/s (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
9 GB/s (23%)
3.5 GB/s (9%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
308.3 Seconds (2%)
710 Seconds (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9475 Points (20%)
5545 Points (12%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.1 s (2%)
12 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.1 s (1%)
27.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
597 s (3%)
694 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
51796 Points (45%)
21501 Points (19%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
13959 Points (38%)
6856 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
64158 Points (52%)
47473 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
64932 Points (53%)
48287 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
66419 Points (56%)
52082 Points (44%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
12224 Points (31%)
6687 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
17915 Points (32%)
9805 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
8049 Points (34%)
2898 Points (12%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1000 Points (42%)
900 Points (38%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6560 Points (12%)
2990 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R7 2700 +
4681 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R7 2700 +
22776 Points (25%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3908 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11829 Points (29%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1243 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
28517 Points (26%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R7 2700 +
140.9 Watt (24%)
41.1 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R7 2700 +
143.2 Watt (26%)
40 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 R7 2700 +
10.8 Points per Watt (8%)
17.3 Points per Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 2700 → 100% n=30

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 3580U → 68% n=30

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 02. 06:39:15

#0 checking url part for id 10030 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11514 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 May 2024 05:34:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.029s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10030 +0.004s ... 0.032s

#7 got single benchmarks 10030 +0.012s ... 0.045s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11514 +0.02s ... 0.065s

#9 got single benchmarks 11514 +0.009s ... 0.074s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.074s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.341s ... 0.415s

#12 return log +0.03s ... 0.444s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)