Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 3 2300U vs AMD 3015Ce

AMD Ryzen 3 2300U

► remove from comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 2300U is a mobile APU for thin and light laptops that was announced in October 2017. It includes four Zen cores clocked at 2 to 3.4 GHz and offers no SMT (four threads) and 4 MB L3-Cache. The integrated graphics card is called Radeon RX Vega 6 and offers 6 CUs (384 Shaders) clocked at up to 1100 MHz. The TDP is configurable between 12 and 25 Watt (15 Watt nominal).

More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

AMD 3015Ce

► remove from comparison AMD 3015Ce

The AMD 3015Ce (Codename Dali) is a mobile APU that integrates two Zen cores (with SMT, therefore 4 threads) clocked at 1.2 to 2.3 GHz. It is the Chromebook version of the AMD 3015e with identical specifications. The TDP is specified at 6 Watt and therefore the chip can be passively cooled. The integrated Radeon graphics card offers 3 CUs at up to 600 MHz (Radeon RX Vega 3). The single channel memory controller supports only DDR4-1600. The chip is manufactured in 14nm and officially counted to the 3000 series of mobile processors.

AMD compares the performance of the 3015e (and therefore also the identical 3015Ce) against the entry level Intel Celeron N4120 (Quad-Core Atom). The 3015e should be 36% faster in single thread Cinebench R20 test. This is expected as the Atom cores offer a low single thread performance. Multi-thread benchmarks were not provided, so we guess the N4120 will be faster with its 4 cores. In PCMark 10 the 3015e should be 18% faster and in the 3DMark Night Raid the integrated GPU should beat the UHD Graphics 600 in the N4120 by 24%.

More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

ModelAMD Ryzen 3 2300UAMD 3015Ce
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
CodenameZenZen
Series: Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) Zen
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G compare3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2800H compare3.3 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G compare3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H compare3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
» AMD Ryzen 3 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon 300U compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050e compare1.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD 3020e compare1.2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 24 MB
AMD 3015e compare1.2 - 2.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD 3015Ce1.2 - 2.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G compare3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2800H compare3.3 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G compare3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H compare3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon 300U compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050e compare1.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD 3020e compare1.2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 24 MB
AMD 3015e compare1.2 - 2.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
» AMD 3015Ce1.2 - 2.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
Clock2000 - 3400 MHz1200 - 2300 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB192 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 4
TDP15 Watt6 Watt
Transistors4500 Million
Technology14 nm14 nm
SocketAM4FT5
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
max. Temp.105 °C

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
422.5 Points (4%)
0255075100125150175200225250275300325350375400Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
79 Points (27%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
4.5 Points (8%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.8 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
20098 Points (18%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
5762 Points (35%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
12151 Points (12%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
5191 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
45492 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 3015Ce +
35423 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
4332 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
6355 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1855 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 3015Ce +
2475 Points (31%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
783 Points (38%)
564 Points (28%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2360 Points (8%)
1135 Points (4%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 3015Ce +
1415 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 3015Ce +
344.3 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 3015Ce +
23395 Points (24%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 3015Ce +
118 Points (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 3015Ce +
24872 Points (68%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 3015Ce +
9775 Points (53%)
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
100%
1 3015Ce +
71 Points (39%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 3015Ce +
5.7 Watt (21%)
0123456Tooltip

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 2300U → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD 3015Ce → 60% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 26. 13:54:38

#0 checking url part for id 9672 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14368 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:12:54 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#26 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#27 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#28 getting avg benchmarks for device 9672 +0s ... 0.006s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#31 got single benchmarks 9672 +0.007s ... 0.014s

#32 getting avg benchmarks for device 14368 +0s ... 0.014s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#35 got single benchmarks 14368 +0s ... 0.014s

#36 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.014s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.02s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.02s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#61 min, max, avg, median took s +0.004s ... 0.029s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#63 return log +0.004s ... 0.033s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)