Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M

► remove from comparison

The NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100 is a business graphics card for laptops which is most likely based on the same core as the GeForce GT 330m / Quadro FX 880M. The NVS series is optimized for business applications and stability and may therefore perform a bit worse in games due to the special drivers and BIOS optimizations.

As the GT 330M, the NVS5100 should support PureVideo HD (VP4?) to accelerate HD videos and CUDA / DirectX Compute to use the render cores for other applications.

 

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

The Nvidia Quadro FX 1700M is a professional graphics adapter for CAD and 3D applications. It is based on the G96 core (GeForce 9650M e.g.) but with different drivers, that are optimized for OpenGL and professional applications. The drivers are zertified to work flawlessly with different applications.

Compared to the Quadro FX 1600M, the FX 1700M GPU supports Powermizer 8.0.

show full text
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100MNVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
Quadro FX Series
Quadro NVS 5100M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro NVS 320M compare 32 @ 0.58 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 300M compare 8/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro NVS 140M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 160M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 150M compare 8 @ 0.53 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 135M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro NVS 130M compare 8 64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 120M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 110M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.3 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameN10P-NSNB9P-GLM
ArchitectureGT2xxG9x
Pipelines48 - unified32 - unified
Core Speed550 MHz625 MHz
Shader Speed1210 MHz1250 MHz
Memory Speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB256 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption35 Watt50 Watt
technology40 nm65 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sizedlarge
Date of Announcement07.01.2010 01.10.2008
Transistors289 Million
FeaturesOpenGL 2.1, PureVideo HD, Powermizer 8.0, possible interfaces: LVDS, DVI, VGA, HDTV, HDCP, HDMI
InformationCG shading language, 32 Bit floating point precision, 12 Bit subpixel precision, 128 Bit precision of the graphics pipeline, FSAA with rotated raster, nView Mutlidisplay Support, High-Precision-Dynamic-Range (HPDR), Hardware 3D Clipping on window recognision, full screen AA
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
2634 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
2156 Points (1%)
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
24702 Points (26%)
35734 Points (37%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
18881 Points (10%)
18212 Points (10%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
13125 Points (14%)
11550 Points (13%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M
3DMark 06
6325 Points (8%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M
3DMark 06
7002 Points (9%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
6302 Points (8%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
7.4 Points (15%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
5.7 Points (12%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
20.8 Points (11%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
8.6 Points (17%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
15.2 Points (23%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
3.2 Points (8%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
4 Points (8%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.5 Points (82%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.5 Points (82%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 3602     avg: 3700     median: 3700 (3%)     max: 3798 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
6159 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M → 117% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro NVS 5100M:
59  fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
Quadro NVS 5100M:
19  fps
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
100%
Quadro NVS 5100M:
225  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro NVS 5100M:
58  fps
high 1280x1024
100%
Quadro NVS 5100M:
21  fps
Racedriver: GRID

Racedriver: GRID

2008
high 1280x1024
100%
Quadro NVS 5100M:
29  fps
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 1700M:
33.3  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 1700M:
19.1  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 1700M:
29.3  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 1700M:
17.1  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
Quadro FX 1700M:
378  fps
med. 800x600
Quadro FX 1700M:
152  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 1700M:
59  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 1700M:
610  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Anno 14045919
Sims 32255821
Racedriver: GRID29
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1

1
1

2


1








NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Crysis - GPU Benchmark33.3119.06
Crysis - CPU Benchmark29.317.07
F.E.A.R.37815259
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo610
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1		1
1

1		2
1

1








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 14. 15:22:25

#0 checking url part for id 1627 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1087 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:35:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.084s ... 0.085s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.085s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.085s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1627 +0.025s ... 0.11s

#8 got single benchmarks 1627 +0.008s ... 0.118s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1087 +0.002s ... 0.12s

#10 got single benchmarks 1087 +0.006s ... 0.126s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.126s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.172s ... 0.298s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.298s

#14 Got 14 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.301s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.301s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.303s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.013s ... 0.316s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.317s

#19 return log +0.068s ... 0.385s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)