Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

DirectX 10 medium class business graphic card, which is optimized for compatibility and stability. The graphic card seems to have the same core like the 8700M series and therefore shows good performance data.

A particularity of the graphic card are the "Unified Shaders". There don't exist any more dedicated pixel- and vertex shaders but 16 so called Stream processors maintain the upcomming graphic work (which was done by the pixel and vertex Shaders, up to now).

The memory clock of the Quadro NVS 320M depends on the implemented memory type: 400 MHz with GDDR2 and 700 MHz with GDDR3.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

The Nvidia Quadro FX 1700M is a professional graphics adapter for CAD and 3D applications. It is based on the G96 core (GeForce 9650M e.g.) but with different drivers, that are optimized for OpenGL and professional applications. The drivers are zertified to work flawlessly with different applications.

Compared to the Quadro FX 1600M, the FX 1700M GPU supports Powermizer 8.0.

show full text
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320MNVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
Quadro FX Series
Quadro NVS 5100M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro NVS 320M 32 @ 0.58 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 300M compare 8/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro NVS 140M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 160M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 150M compare 8 @ 0.53 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 135M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro NVS 130M compare 8 64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 120M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 110M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.3 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameG84MNB9P-GLM
ArchitectureG8xG9x
Pipelines32 - unified32 - unified
Core Speed575 MHz625 MHz
Shader Speed1150 MHz1250 MHz
Memory Speed700 MHz800 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3, GDDR2GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB256 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption20 Watt50 Watt
Transistors289 Million289 Million
technology80 nm65 nm
FeaturesShader clock frequence 1200 MHz, PureVideo technology (H.264, VC-1, MPEG2, WMV9 decoder acceleration), HDCP-capable, PowerMizer 7.0 energy management (dynamic switching between performance and energy saving), HDR (high dynamic-range lighting), designed for Windows Vista, 16x full image AA, 16x AF independent on angles, 128-bit HDR illumination with AA, Dual-Link DVI exits for TFT resolutions up to 2560x1600, PCI-E 16x, OpenGL 2.1, Gigathread technology

OpenGL 2.1, PureVideo HD, Powermizer 8.0, possible interfaces: LVDS, DVI, VGA, HDTV, HDCP, HDMI
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement09.06.2007 01.10.2008
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.dewww.nvidia.com
InformationCG shading language, 32 Bit floating point precision, 12 Bit subpixel precision, 128 Bit precision of the graphics pipeline, FSAA with rotated raster, nView Mutlidisplay Support, High-Precision-Dynamic-Range (HPDR), Hardware 3D Clipping on window recognision, full screen AA

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
29508 Points (31%)
35734 Points (37%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
13895 Points (7%)
18212 Points (10%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 9070     avg: 9075     median: 9074.5 (10%)     max: 9079 Points
11550 Points (13%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
3DMark 06
4781 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
3DMark 06
4769 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
3DMark 06
6302 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6159 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M → 126% n=3

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 1700M:
33.3  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 1700M:
19.1  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 1700M:
29.3  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 1700M:
17.1  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Quadro NVS 320M:
365  fps
104%
Quadro FX 1700M:
378  fps
med. 800x600
100%
Quadro NVS 320M:
139  fps
109%
Quadro FX 1700M:
152  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro NVS 320M:
49  fps
120%
Quadro FX 1700M:
59  fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Quadro NVS 320M:
166  fps
med. 640x480
100%
Quadro NVS 320M:
163.5  fps
high 800x600
100%
Quadro NVS 320M:
154.3  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Quadro NVS 320M:
124  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro NVS 320M:
468.4  fps
130%
Quadro FX 1700M:
610  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M → 116%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 120%

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Crysis - GPU Benchmark33.3119.06
Crysis - CPU Benchmark29.317.07
F.E.A.R.37815259
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo610
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1		1
1

1		2
1

1








NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
F.E.A.R.36513949
Doom 3166163.5154.3124
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo468.4
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


2


2
1

2


1





For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 01. 16:54:32

#0 checking url part for id 208 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1087 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:39:27 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.134s ... 0.135s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.135s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.135s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 208 +0.026s ... 0.161s

#8 got single benchmarks 208 +0.008s ... 0.169s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1087 +0.001s ... 0.17s

#10 got single benchmarks 1087 +0.006s ... 0.176s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.176s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.122s ... 0.298s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.298s

#14 Got 16 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.3s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.3s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.302s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.012s ... 0.314s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.314s

#19 return log +0.045s ... 0.359s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)