ERROR: No GPU found with the ID:140

getGPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German GPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected) NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M vs vs Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M vs vs Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M

► remove from comparison

The NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M is a business entry-level graphics card for laptop. It is based on the GeForce 8500M GT consumer graphics card and designed for the business sector providing enhanced compatibility and stability. Regarding performance it should be comparable to a 8400M GT, but, might rate a little lower, because of the drivers that emphasize on stability.  Therefore, the NVS 140M provides only entry-level 3D performance.

► remove from comparison

Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core

► remove from comparison Vivante Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core

The Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core is an integrated graphics card for ARM based SoCs. It supports Android, Windows Mobile 6, Windows CE and Linux and the standards OpenGL ES 2.0, OpenGL 2.1, OpenVG 1.1, and DirectX 11 (9_3). The chip is can be clocked with up to 600 MHz (28nm LP) or 800 MHz (28nm HPM). The theoretical calculating power of the GPU is 50 Mio triangles / s, 650 Mio pixels / s and 12 GFLOPS (according to cnx-software.com). According to Vivante however the GC1000 is capable of 345 to 460 Mio triangles /s and 11 to 15 GFLOPS.

show full text
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140MVivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
Series
Quadro NVS 5100M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro NVS 320M 32 @ 0.58 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 300M 8/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro NVS 140M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 160M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 150M 8 @ 0.53 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 135M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro NVS 130M 8 64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 120M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 110M 4/3 cores @ 0.3 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core 2 @ 0.6 GHz
GC800 1 @ 0.32 - 0.58 GHz
Extreme Graphics 2 @ 0.13 GHz
PXP
unknown
CodenameG84M
Pipelines16 - unified2 - unified
Core Speed400 MHz600 / 800 MHz
Shader Speed800 MHz
Memory Speed700 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3, GDDR2
Max. Amount of Memory256 MB
Shared Memoryyesno
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 9_3, OpenGL 2.1 / ES 2.0
Power Consumption10 Watt
Transistors210 Million
technology80 nm
FeaturesVGA, DVI-D, LVDS, HDTV, HDMI screen connections, max 2 per card, nView, PCI-e 16x
Date of Announcement09.05.2007 12.09.2013
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 2237     avg: 2329     median: 2373 (0%)     max: 2377 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 997     avg: 1177     median: 1207.5 (0%)     max: 1295 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 1912     avg: 2310     median: 2255 (0%)     max: 2694 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 7396     avg: 12268     median: 13071.5 (14%)     max: 13747 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 3185     avg: 4557     median: 5242 (3%)     max: 5244 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 1969     avg: 2943     median: 3127.5 (3%)     max: 3177 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
3DMark 06
min: 1281     avg: 1491     median: 1614 (2%)     max: 1640 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
3DMark 06
1410 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
3DMark 06
1406 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
2408 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
4 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
0 fps (0%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 2.5     avg: 2.8     median: 2.7 (0%)     max: 3.3 fps
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Off-screen
1651 Points (57%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Score
4981 Points (44%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 GPU
5503 Points (57%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 13.87     avg: 18     median: 20.1 (33%)     max: 20.09 fps
Basemark X 1.0 - Basemark X 1.0 Off-Screen
min: 1.246     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (8%)     max: 2.262 fps
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
min: 38.2     avg: 48.8     median: 49.5 (74%)     max: 58 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 1549     avg: 1910     median: 1798 (2%)     max: 2667 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 682     avg: 707     median: 688 (1%)     max: 753 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 1832     avg: 2304     median: 2322 (50%)     max: 2758 Points

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
100%
Quadro NVS 140M:
121.5  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro NVS 140M:
43.9  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro NVS 140M:
21.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro NVS 140M:
5.6  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Quadro NVS 140M:
59 278 309 ~ 215 fps
med. 800x600
100%
Quadro NVS 140M:
55 57 ~ 56 fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro NVS 140M:
16 17 ~ 17 fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Quadro NVS 140M:
86.8 99.9 102 ~ 96 fps
med. 640x480
100%
Quadro NVS 140M:
95.7 100.3 102 ~ 99 fps
high 800x600
100%
Quadro NVS 140M:
64.7 65.6 65.7 ~ 65 fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Quadro NVS 140M:
25.4 31.4 39.1 39.5 ~ 34 fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro NVS 140M:
127.5  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Fifa 11121.543.921.85.6
F.E.A.R.2155617
Doom 396996534
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo127.5
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
2
2
1
2

1
1		1
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 26. 17:58:38

#0 checking url part for id 85 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 140 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 4572 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.137s ... 0.138s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.138s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.138s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 85 +0.047s ... 0.185s

#9 got single benchmarks 85 +0.015s ... 0.2s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 140 +0.002s ... 0.202s

#11 got single benchmarks 140 +0s ... 0.203s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 4572 +0.002s ... 0.204s

#13 got single benchmarks 4572 +0.015s ... 0.219s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.219s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.147s ... 0.366s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.381s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.381s

#18 Got 25 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.385s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.385s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.387s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.01s ... 0.397s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.397s

#23 return log +0.002s ... 0.399s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)