Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

► remove from comparison

Business graphics card based on the GeForce 8400M GS. Drivers and Bios are optimized for stability and business applications. The features are similar to the 8400M series.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M

This is a professional video card for notebooks from NVidia It is based on 7900GTX.

The application performance is very good due to special professional drivers (3D rendering, CAD), but the gaming performance is weaker. With modded drivers, it should work like a 7900 GTX.

show full text
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135MNVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
Quadro FX Series
Quadro NVS 5100M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro NVS 320M compare 32 @ 0.58 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 300M compare 8/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro NVS 140M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 160M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 150M compare 8 @ 0.53 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 135M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro NVS 130M compare 8 64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 120M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 110M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.3 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameG86MG71glm
Pipelines16 - unified24 / 8 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed400 MHz500 MHz
Shader Speed800 MHz
Memory Speed600 MHz600 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3, GDDR2GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory256 MB512 MB
Shared Memoryyesno
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0
Power Consumption10 Watt45 Watt
Transistors210 Million278 Million
technology80 nm90 nm
FeaturesVGA, DVI, LVDS, HDTV, HDMI, max 2, nView, PCI-e 16x90nm
Date of Announcement09.05.2007 29.09.2005
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.comwww.nvidia.de
ArchitectureG7x
Notebook Sizelarge

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
10100 Points (10%)
27600 Points (29%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
3570 Points (2%)
min: 18100     avg: 18342     median: 18341.5 (10%)     max: 18583 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
1900 Points (2%)
min: 8400     avg: 8450     median: 8450 (9%)     max: 8500 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M
3DMark 06
965 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
3DMark 06
min: 4690     avg: 4695     median: 4695 (6%)     max: 4700 Points

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M → 411% n=3

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 01. 16:31:53

#0 checking url part for id 211 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:39:27 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.092s ... 0.093s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.093s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.093s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 211 +0.024s ... 0.118s

#8 got single benchmarks 211 +0.008s ... 0.125s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 5 +0.001s ... 0.127s

#10 got single benchmarks 5 +0.007s ... 0.134s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.134s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.105s ... 0.239s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.239s

#14 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.241s

#15 return log +0.07s ... 0.311s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)