Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M

It is based on the GeForce Go 7300 with professional certified graphics drivers for applications like CAD, Rendering, 3D modelling, etc. The usability for games is limited. It is the smaller version of the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M for notebooks.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

The Nvidia Quadro FX 2700M is a professional graphics card for laptops. It features certified drivers that are optimized for CAD (e.g., AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Solid Edge, ..), DCC (e.g., Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3D, ...), and visualization applications. The FX 2700M is based on the G94 core and therefore similar to the GeForce 9700M GTS.

The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. Especially the OpenGL performance should be noticeable better than with consumer GeForce cards. The certified drivers, that come with the Quadro cards guarantee a frictionless work with applications like AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3d and others. Furthermore they offer 12-Bit precision for subpixels, fullscreen anti-aliasing, hardware accelerated antialiasing for points and lines and other CAD and DCC optimizations.

 

show full text
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110MNVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Quadro FX Series
Quadro NVS 5100M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro NVS 320M compare 32 @ 0.58 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 300M compare 8/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro NVS 140M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 160M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 150M compare 8 @ 0.53 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 135M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro NVS 130M compare 8 64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 120M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 110M 4/3 cores @ 0.3 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameG72MNB9E-GLM2
Pipelines4 / 3 Pixel- / Vertexshader48 - unified
Core Speed300 MHz530 MHz
Memory Speed600 MHz800 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeDDR-3GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory64 MB1024 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption10 Watt65 Watt
Transistors112 Million504 Million
technology90 nm65 nm
FeaturesPureVideo, UltraShadow II, Intellisample 4.0, CineFX 4.0, PowerMizer 6.0, High Dynamic-Range (HDR) LighningOpenGL 2.1, PowerMizer 8.0, PureVideo HD
Date of Announcement01.06.2006 14.08.2008
Information90nm, 112 Mio Transistoren, PCI-E
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.comwww.nvidia.com
ArchitectureG9x
Shader Speed1325 MHz
Notebook Sizelarge

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
2799 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
2392 Points (1%)
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
11000 Points (11%)
36280 Points (38%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 3300     avg: 3686     median: 3685.5 (2%)     max: 4071 Points
min: 23330     avg: 23842     median: 23841.5 (12%)     max: 24353 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
1500 Points (2%)
min: 13450     avg: 14224     median: 14224 (16%)     max: 14998 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
3DMark 06
590 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
7580 Points (10%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
3DMark 06
600 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
7660 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
4394 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M → 897% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 17. 08:52:49

#0 checking url part for id 39 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 883 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:38:48 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.082s ... 0.083s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.083s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.083s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 39 +0.027s ... 0.111s

#8 got single benchmarks 39 +0.01s ... 0.121s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 883 +0.002s ... 0.122s

#10 got single benchmarks 883 +0.01s ... 0.132s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.132s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.165s ... 0.297s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.297s

#14 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.299s

#15 return log +0.071s ... 0.37s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)