NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M ► remove from comparison
For CAD and professional applications certified GPU based on the 8400M GS. The higher power consumption of 17 Watt versus 11 Watt of the 8400M GS indicates a higher performance.
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M ► remove from comparison
The NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M was the top professional graphic solution for the mobile use in 2007. The Quadro FX 3500M is especially suitable for CAD, digital image-, video editing and scientifical visualizations (according NVIDIA). It is based upon the NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950GTX . Therefore also a good gaming performance can be expected (for 2007 and if modded drivers are used). The card is shipped with certified drivers for professional applications, which are not optimized for games (inofficially the manual installation of Forceware drivers should be possible).
The drivers of the Quadro FX series are certified for CAD applications (e.g. AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Solud Edge, ...) and DCC applictions (e.g. Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3D, ...) and offers a 12-Bit precision for Subpixel, full image Antialiasing, hardware accelerated Antialiasing for dots and lines and additional optimized settings, which are optimized for CAD and DCC.
Nvidia describes the 3000 series as a power package for big laptops and data structures.
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M ► remove from comparison
The NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M is a mobile workstation graphics card for high end laptops. It is based on the Geforce GTX 280M core (G92 core) and features 128 CUDA cores (unified shaders).
Compared to the Quadro FX 3700M, the Quadro FX 3800M features a higher clock speed and is manufacturered in 55nm (compared to 65nm of the 3700M). In fact, the FX3800M is clocked even higher than the consumer GeForce GTX 280M and performs notably better as a result.
The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. Notably, OpenGL performance should be much improved compared to consumer GeForce cards of similar specifications.
At the time its announcement (December 2009), the FX 3800M was the fastest workstation graphics card for laptops.
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M Quadro FX Series Codename NB8M-GLM G71GLM N10E-GLM4 Pipelines 16 - unified 24 / 8 Pixel- / Vertexshader 128 - unified Core Speed 400 MHz 575 MHz 675 MHz Shader Speed 800 MHz 1688 MHz Memory Speed 600 MHz 700 MHz 1000 MHz Memory Bus Width 64 Bit 256 Bit 256 Bit Memory Type GDDR3 GDDR3 GDDR3 Max. Amount of Memory 256 MB 512 MB 1024 MB Shared Memory no no no API DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0 DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 Power Consumption 17 Watt 45 Watt 100 Watt Transistors 210 Million 278 Million 754 Million technology 80 nm 90 nm 55 nm Features PowerMizer 7.0, HDR, designed for Vista, 128 Bit HDR, OpenGl 2.1 12-bit-sub-pixel, 32-bit-floating-point precision, 32-bit floating point precision, 128 bit graphic pipeline, hardware 3D window clipping, high precision dynamic-range (DPDR) technology, unified memory architecture, nView multi-display (for multi-monitor support), PowerMizer options for energy saving, architecture which is optimized for workstations, rotated-grid full-scene antialiasing (RG FSAA), unified driver architecture, NVIDIA PureVideo technology OpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0 Date of Announcement 09.05.2007 01.03.2007 20.12.2009 Link to Manufacturer Page www.nvidia.de www.nvidia.com www.nvidia.com Architecture G7x G9x Notebook Size large large
Benchmarks min: 6584 avg: 6951 median: 6779 (2%) max: 7491 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 5758 avg: 5926 median: 6002 (3%) max: 6019 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 13650 avg: 15054 median: 15053.5 (16%) max: 16457 Points
min: 32886 avg: 34790 median: 34790 (36%) max: 36694 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 5580 avg: 6010 median: 6010 (3%) max: 6440 Points
20736 Points (11%)
min: 33146 avg: 37082 median: 38191 (20%) max: 39909 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 3365 avg: 3372 median: 3372 (4%) max: 3379 Points
9295 Points (10%)
min: 16593 avg: 18199 median: 18043 (20%) max: 19960 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
1490 Points (2%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) T7500 Quadro FX 360M 400 / 800 MHz 0.3 GB 2 GB 1490
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
min: 12050 avg: 12765 median: 12923 (17%) max: 13323 Points
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 Lenovo ThinkPad W701ds NTV5FPB164 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) 820QM Quadro FX 3800M 675 / 1650 MHz 1 GB 16 GB 12050 HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) 740QM Quadro FX 3800M 675 / 1000 MHz 1 GB 8 GB 12923 Dell Precision M6500 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024) 920XM Quadro FX 3800M 675/1688 / 1000 MHz 1 GB 13323
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
1572 Points (2%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 Dell Precision M2300 (3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800) T7700 Quadro FX 360M 432 / 400 MHz 0.1 GB 1 GB 1572
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
5254 Points (7%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings (3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings) T7600 Quadro FX 3500M 5254
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
13232 Points (17%)
Model CPU GPU RAM Value 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings Dell Precision M6500 (3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings) 920XM Quadro FX 3800M 1 GB 4 GB 13232
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
32.8 Points (68%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
45.8 Points (96%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
47.4 Points (100%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
59.7 Points (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
51.1 Points (100%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
59.7 Points (88%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
38.5 Points (100%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
35.3 Points (72%)
SPECviewperf 11 specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
18.8 fps (11%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
18.7 fps (11%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
30.6 fps (23%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
6.9 fps (8%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
16.6 fps (12%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
38.4 fps (41%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
16.2 fps (8%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
23.4 fps (12%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
2985 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
min: 4429 avg: 4928 median: 4928 (4%) max: 5427 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 32.07 avg: 32.7 median: 32.7 (11%) max: 33.29 fps
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M → 100% n=2 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M → 310% n=2 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M → 585% n=2
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Quadro FX 3800M:
230.6 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
124.2 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
64.9 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
31.8 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
78.5 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
40.9 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
97 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
82 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
29.9 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
142.8 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
61.9 [X] HP EliteBook 8740w (WD942EA) Intel Core i7-740QM 1.7GHz
Quadro FX 3800M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
10.1 [X] Dell Precision M2300 Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 360M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
7.4 [X] Dell Precision M2300 Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 360M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
328 [X] Dell Precision M2300 Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 360M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
62 [X] Dell Precision M2300 Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 360M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
17 [X] Dell Precision M2300 Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 360M
fps
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
242.7 [X] Dell Precision M2300 Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 360M
fps
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Fifa 11 230.6 124.2 Risen 64.9 31.8 Need for Speed Shift 78.5 40.9 Colin McRae: DIRT 2 97 82 29.9 Anno 1404 142.8 61.9 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 3 1 1 1 2 1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M low med. high ultra QHD 4K Crysis - GPU Benchmark 10.07 Crysis - CPU Benchmark 7.39 F.E.A.R. 328 62 17 Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo 242.7 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 2 1 1 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 08. 05:23:33
#0 checking url part for id 513 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 61 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 1541 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 May 2024 05:40:33 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.222s ... 0.223s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.223s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.223s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 513 +0.05s ... 0.273s
#9 got single benchmarks 513 +0.013s ... 0.287s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 61 +0.002s ... 0.289s
#11 got single benchmarks 61 +0.006s ... 0.295s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 1541 +0.002s ... 0.296s
#13 got single benchmarks 1541 +0.018s ... 0.315s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.315s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.362s ... 0.677s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.677s
#17 Got 17 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.683s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.683s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.688s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.023s ... 0.711s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.711s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.714s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)