NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

► remove

For CAD and professional applications certified GPU based on the 8400M GS. The higher power consumption of 17 Watt versus 11 Watt of the 8400M GS indicates a higher performance.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

► remove NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

The NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M is a mobile workstation graphics card for high-end laptops. It is based on the Geforce 9800M GT / G92 core but features a higher clock rate and is produced in a 55nm fabrication process versus 65nm of the 9800M GT.

The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance especially should be noticeably better compared to consumer GeForce cards.

The Quadro FX2800M is found in mobile workstations like the Dell M6500 and supports DirectX 10.0 and OpenGL 2.1. In the Dell laptops, the card is able to output up to two displays simultaneously (DisplayPort up to 2560x1600, DVI/HDMI up to 1920x1200). Dell claims a thermal power draw of 65 Watts while Nvidia rates the GPU at 75 Watt TDP.

Due to the relatively high power consumption of 65 to 75 Watts (TDP) and a 10 Watt idle mode, the Quadro FX 2800M is normally only foud in medium to large laptops with powerful cooling solutions.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

► remove

This is a highend workstation graphic chip (for CAD and 3D programs optimized) with DirectX 10 and good OpenGL support - probably based on the GeForce 8700M GT graphic card. It is intended for digital content creators, engineers, earthscientists and other professional 3D applications. Certified drivers grant thecorrect and faster (compared to 8700M) representation of professional programs (CAD, CCD, visualisation software).

NVIDIA Quadro FX 360MNVIDIA Quadro FX 2800MNVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 675 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 550 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 600 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 560 MHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 530 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 575 MHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 375 MHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 500 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 475 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 625 MHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 580 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 450 MHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 675 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 550 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 600 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 560 MHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 530 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 575 MHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 375 MHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 500 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 475 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 625 MHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 580 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 450 MHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 675 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 550 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 600 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 560 MHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 530 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 575 MHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 375 MHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 500 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 475 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 625 MHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 580 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 450 MHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameNB8M-GLMNB10-GLM3NB8P-GLM
16 - 96 - 32 -
Core400 MHz600 MHz625 MHz
Shader800 MHz1500 MHz1250 MHz
Memory600 MHz1000 MHz800 MHz
Bus64 Bit256 Bit128 Bit
MemoryGDDR3GDDR3GDDR3
Max. Memory256 MB1024 MB256 MB
nonono
DirectXDirectX 10, 4.0DirectX 10, 4.0DirectX 10, 4.0
Transistors210 Million754 Million289 Million
Technology80 nm55 nm80 nm
FeaturesPowerMizer 7.0, HDR, designed for Vista, 128 Bit HDR, OpenGl 2.1OpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0PureVideo, video scaling, LCDs with 1920x1200 pixel, PCI-Express, connection for ext. graphic card
Introduced09.05.2007 01.12.2009 01.06.2007
Manufacturerhttp://www.nvidia.de/page/geforce_8400M....http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...http://www.nvidia.com/page/nb_chipset.html
ArchitectureG9xG8x
Size
CG shading language, 32 bit floating point precision, 12 bit subpixel precision, 128 bit precision of the graphic pipeline, vertex and pixelshader programmability, PCI-E inferface, FSAA with turned grid, nView multidisplay support, high-precision dynamic-range (HPDR) technology, hardware 3D clipping, full screen antialiasing

3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
3DMark 2001SE - Standard 1024x768
min: 13650     avg: 15053.5     median: 15053 (16%)     max: 16457 Points
34844 Points (36%)
min: 27822     avg: 32843     median: 35198 (37%)     max: 35509 Points
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
min: 5580     avg: 6010     median: 6010 (3%)     max: 6440 Points
33900 Points (18%)
min: 15060     avg: 16008.5     median: 15915 (8%)     max: 17144 Points
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
min: 3365     avg: 3372     median: 3372 (6%)     max: 3379 Points
min: 16310     avg: 16935.5     median: 16935 (32%)     max: 17561 Points
min: 9344     avg: 9962.8     median: 9873 (19%)     max: 10375 Points
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
+ NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3ds Max 1280x1024
32.3 fps (67%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia 1280x1024
39 fps (83%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight 1280x1024
44 fps (94%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya 1280x1024
59.6 fps (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer 1280x1024
42.6 fps (84%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks 1280x1024
59.5 fps (89%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter 1280x1024
35.2 fps (93%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX 1280x1024
31.3 fps (65%)
SPECviewperf 11
Siemens NX 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Tcvis 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SolidWorks 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Maya 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Lightwave 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Ensight 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Catia 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Windows Vista Experience Index - GPU Games
6.8 Points (113%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - GPU
6.8 Points (113%)
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M → 100%

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M → 165%

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M → 250%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
Quadro FX 2800M:
63.2  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
56.1  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
48.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 2800M:
30.8  fps
Quadro FX 2800M:
»
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
158  fps
med. 1360x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
60  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
52  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 2800M:
29.6  fps
Quadro FX 2800M:
»
med. 1366x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
58.9  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
41.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 2800M:
23.1  fps
Quadro FX 2800M:
»
low 800x600
Quadro FX 2800M:
158.1  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
79  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
66.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 2800M:
41.2  fps
Quadro FX 2800M:
»
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
Quadro FX 2800M:
96.3  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
89.5  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
62.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 2800M:
30.7  fps
Quadro FX 2800M:
»
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 1600M:
83.2 84.2 ~ 84 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
10.1  fps
318%
Quadro FX 1600M:
31.5 33.3 ~ 32 fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 1600M:
13.6 14.4 15.9 ~ 15 fps
Quadro FX 360M:
»
Quadro FX 1600M:
»
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 1600M:
12.7 72.2 73.1 ~ 53 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
7.4  fps
365%
Quadro FX 1600M:
23.5 29.6 ~ 27 fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 1600M:
13.2 15.6 ~ 14 fps
Quadro FX 360M:
»
Quadro FX 1600M:
»
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 1600M:
36 37 ~ 37 fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 1600M:
21 23 ~ 22 fps
Quadro FX 1600M:
»
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
328  fps
144%
Quadro FX 1600M:
444 476 493 ~ 471 fps
med. 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
62  fps
260%
Quadro FX 1600M:
153 162 167 ~ 161 fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
17  fps
335%
Quadro FX 1600M:
56 56 59 ~ 57 fps
Quadro FX 360M:
»
Quadro FX 1600M:
»
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
Quadro FX 1600M:
160.8 173.6 ~ 167 fps
med. 640x480
Quadro FX 1600M:
164.3 174 ~ 169 fps
high 800x600
Quadro FX 1600M:
160.6 165 ~ 163 fps
ultra 1024x768
Quadro FX 1600M:
129.1 129.2 ~ 129 fps
Quadro FX 1600M:
»
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
242.7  fps
226%
Quadro FX 1600M:
548.9  fps
Quadro FX 360M:
»
Quadro FX 1600M:
»

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M → 275%

v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)