Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M is the version of 7900 GS video card for notebooks, which is optimized for CAD and professional 3D-applications. Technically, it has the same or similar chip (G71 architecture), but with other Bios and support for professional drivers.

The gaming performance is clearly worse than the 7900 GS (because of the application optimizing). Nonetheless, the most modded drivers can be used, so the Quadro FX 1500M is more a 7900 GS (for the operating system).

NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M

► remove from comparison

Performance workstation grafic chip with DirectX 10 support and OpenGL 2.1 support. Probaby, it bases upon the NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT.

It is intended for digital content creators, engineers, geologic scientists and other professional 3D applications.

The drivers of the Quadro FX series are certified for CAD applications (e.g. AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Solid Edge, ...) and DCC applications (e.g. Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3D, ...) and offer a 12-bit precision for subpixel, full image-antialiasing, hardware accelerated antialiasing for dots and lines and additional drivers are for CAD and DCC optimized settings.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

The NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M is a mobile workstation graphics card for high-end laptops. It is based on the Geforce 9800M GT / G92 core but features a higher clock rate and is produced in a 55nm fabrication process versus 65nm of the 9800M GT.

The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. OpenGL performance especially should be noticeably better compared to consumer GeForce cards.

The Quadro FX2800M is found in mobile workstations like the Dell M6500 and supports DirectX 10.0 and OpenGL 2.1. In the Dell laptops, the card is able to output up to two displays simultaneously (DisplayPort up to 2560x1600, DVI/HDMI up to 1920x1200). Dell claims a thermal power draw of 65 Watts while Nvidia rates the GPU at 75 Watt TDP.

Due to the relatively high power consumption of 65 to 75 Watts (TDP) and a 10 Watt idle mode, the Quadro FX 2800M is normally only foud in medium to large laptops with powerful cooling solutions.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500MNVIDIA Quadro FX 570MNVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameG71GLMG64GLMNB10-GLM3
ArchitectureG7xG8xG9x
Pipelines20 / 7 Pixel- / Vertexshader32 - unified96 - unified
Core Speed375 MHz475 MHz600 MHz
Memory Speed500 MHz700 MHz1000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit128 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3GDDR3GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB256 MB1024 MB
Shared Memorynonono
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption20 Watt35 Watt75 Watt
Transistors278 Million289 Million754 Million
technology90 nm80 nm55 nm
Features90nmOpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0
Notebook Sizelargemedium sizedlarge
Date of Announcement18.04.2006 01.06.2007 01.12.2009
InformationPCI-E, 90nmPowermizer 7.0, CG Shading language, 32 bit floating point precision, 12 bit subpixel precision, 128 bit graphic pipeline, vertex and pixelshader programmability, PureVideo HD, PCI-E interface, FSAA with turned grid, nView multidisplay support, high-precision dynamic-range (HPDR) technology, hardware 3D clipping, full image antialiasing
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.de/page/quadrofx_go.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.de/page/quadrofx_go.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...
Shader Speed950 MHz1500 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 5779     avg: 5783     median: 5783 (5%)     max: 5787 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 5000     avg: 5037     median: 5037 (4%)     max: 5074 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
26279 Points (27%)
min: 24479     avg: 26908     median: 26907.5 (28%)     max: 29336 Points
34844 Points (36%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 14650     avg: 15283     median: 15283 (8%)     max: 15916 Points
min: 11586     avg: 11958     median: 11957.5 (6%)     max: 12329 Points
33900 Points (18%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 6386     avg: 6666     median: 6400 (9%)     max: 7212 Points
min: 7674     avg: 7790     median: 7700 (11%)     max: 7997 Points
min: 16310     avg: 16936     median: 16935.5 (24%)     max: 17561 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
3DMark 06
min: 3900     avg: 3903     median: 3903 (6%)     max: 3906 Points
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
3883 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
3DMark 06
4074 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
3800 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
min: 11162     avg: 11359     median: 11358.5 (17%)     max: 11555 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
3DMark 06
3904 Points (6%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
32.3 Points (67%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
39 Points (82%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
44 Points (93%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
59.6 Points (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
42.6 Points (83%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
59.5 Points (88%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
35.2 Points (91%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
31.3 Points (64%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 13.58     avg: 14.7     median: 13.9 (10%)     max: 16.55 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 15.1     avg: 16     median: 15.3 (26%)     max: 17.4 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 6.73     avg: 14.1     median: 7.5 (9%)     max: 28 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 4.67     avg: 5.1     median: 4.7 (19%)     max: 5.89 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 6.2     avg: 7     median: 7.4 (6%)     max: 7.5 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 7.99     avg: 16.2     median: 8.5 (9%)     max: 32 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 10.8     avg: 11.9     median: 11.1 (5%)     max: 13.7 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 9.53     avg: 13.4     median: 9.7 (12%)     max: 20.92 fps
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
6.8 Points (100%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
6.8 Points (100%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
4534 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
9.3 fps (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
min: 28.16     avg: 28.8     median: 28.8 (10%)     max: 29.36 fps

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M → 99% n=4

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M → 224% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
Quadro FX 2800M:
63.2  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
56.1  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
48.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 2800M:
30.8  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
158  fps
med. 1360x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
60  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
52  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 2800M:
29.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
58.9  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
41.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 2800M:
23.1  fps
low 800x600
Quadro FX 2800M:
158.1  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
78.9  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
66.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 2800M:
41.2  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
Quadro FX 2800M:
96.3  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
89.5  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro FX 2800M:
62.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 2800M:
30.7  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
259  fps
168%
Quadro FX 570M:
436  fps
med. 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
143  fps
90%
Quadro FX 570M:
128  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
63  fps
54%
Quadro FX 570M:
19 22 24 29 43 43 45 49 ~ 34 fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
114.5  fps
103%
Quadro FX 570M:
118  fps
med. 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
113.6  fps
103%
Quadro FX 570M:
116.7  fps
high 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
113.9  fps
98%
Quadro FX 570M:
111.3  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
109.3  fps
82%
Quadro FX 570M:
89.7  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
380.7  fps
132%
Quadro FX 570M:
501  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M → 104%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 54%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.17
log 25. 06:02:25

#0 checking url part for id 7 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 182 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1544 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:25:51 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.044s ... 0.045s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.046s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#38 composed specs +0s ... 0.046s

#39 did output specs +0s ... 0.046s

#40 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.046s

#41 getting avg benchmarks for device 7 +0.042s ... 0.089s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#43 got single benchmarks 7 +0.006s ... 0.095s

#44 getting avg benchmarks for device 182 +0s ... 0.095s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#46 got single benchmarks 182 +0.006s ... 0.102s

#47 getting avg benchmarks for device 1544 +0s ... 0.102s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.102s

#49 got single benchmarks 1544 +0.006s ... 0.109s

#50 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.109s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.109s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.11s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.11s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.11s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.111s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.111s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.111s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.111s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.111s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.112s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.112s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.112s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.114s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.114s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.115s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.117s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.117s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.118s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.118s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.118s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.118s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.118s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.118s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.118s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.118s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.118s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.119s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.119s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.119s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.119s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.119s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.119s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.119s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.119s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.119s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.12s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.12s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.12s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.121s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#112 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.122s

#113 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.122s

#114 Got 42 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.127s

#115 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.127s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#127 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.128s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.129s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.13s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.13s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.131s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.132s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.133s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.134s

#160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#161 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#162 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#164 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#166 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#167 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.134s

#168 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#169 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.134s

#170 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.134s

#171 return log +0.001s ... 0.135s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)