NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M ► remove
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M is the version of 7900 GS video card for notebooks, which is optimized for CAD and professional 3D-applications. Technically, it has the same or similar chip (G71 architecture), but with other Bios and support for professional drivers.
The gaming performance is clearly worse than the 7900 GS (because of the application optimizing). Nonetheless, the most modded drivers can be used, so the Quadro FX 1500M is more a 7900 GS (for the operating system).
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M ► remove
The Nvidia GeForce FX 3700M is a professional high-end workstation graphics card for laptops. It is manufactured in 65nm and is based on the G92 core with all 128 shaders enabled. The GPU is most comparable to the consumer GeForce GTX 280M with the largest difference being the manufacturing process (65nm of the 3700M vs 55nm of the 280M). The immediate successor to the 3700M is the Quadro FX 3800M , which is based on the GeForce GTX 285M but with higher clock rates and relatively similar power consumption demands.
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M ► remove
This is a highend workstation graphic chip (for CAD and 3D programs optimized) with DirectX 10 and good OpenGL support - probably based on the GeForce 8700M GT graphic card. It is intended for digital content creators, engineers, earthscientists and other professional 3D applications. Certified drivers grant thecorrect and faster (compared to 8700M) representation of professional programs (CAD, CCD, visualisation software).
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M Manufacturer NVIDIA NVIDIA NVIDIA Quadro FX Series Codename G71GLM NB9E-GLM3 NB8P-GLM Architecture G7x G9x G8x 20 / 7 128 - 32 - Core 375 MHz 550 MHz 625 MHz Memory 500 MHz 800 MHz 800 MHz Bus 256 Bit 256 Bit 128 Bit Memory GDDR3 GDDR3 GDDR3 Max. Memory 512 MB 1024 MB 256 MB no no no DirectX DirectX 9c, 3.0 DirectX 10, 4.0 DirectX 10, 4.0 Transistors 278 Million 754 Million 289 Million Technology 90 nm 65 nm 80 nm Features 90nm OpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0 PureVideo, video scaling, LCDs with 1920x1200 pixel, PCI-Express, connection for ext. graphic card Size Introduced 18.04.2006 14.08.2008 01.06.2007 PCI-E, 90nm CG shading language, 32 bit floating point precision, 12 bit subpixel precision, 128 bit precision of the graphic pipeline, vertex and pixelshader programmability, PCI-E inferface, FSAA with turned grid, nView multidisplay support, high-precision dynamic-range (HPDR) technology, hardware 3D clipping, full screen antialiasing Manufacturer http://www.nvidia.de/page/quadrofx_go.html http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua... http://www.nvidia.com/page/nb_chipset.html Shader 1375 MHz 1250 MHz
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M 3DMark Vantage - P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024
4326 Points (5%)
3DMark 2001SE - Standard 1024x768
26279 Points (27%)
min: 27822 avg: 32843 median: 35198 (37%) max: 35509 Points
HP Compaq 8710w T7700 2048 625 / 800 MHz 512MB GDDR3 ForceWare 174.70 27822
Dell Precision M6300 T9300 3072 625 / 800 MHz 256MB GDDR3, 512MB mit TurboCache 35198
HP Compaq 8710w T9500 4096 625 / 800 MHz 512MB GDDR3 8.14.11.0163 (Forceware 101.63) 35509
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
min: 14650 avg: 15283 median: 15283 (8%) max: 15916 Points
min: 15060 avg: 16008.5 median: 15915 (8%) max: 17144 Points
15060
HP Compaq 8710w T9500 4096 625 / 800 MHz 512MB GDDR3 8.14.11.0163 (Forceware 101.63) 15216
HP Compaq 8710w T7700 2048 625 / 800 MHz 512MB GDDR3 ForceWare 174.70 16614
Dell Precision M6300 T9300 3072 625 / 800 MHz 256MB GDDR3, 512MB mit TurboCache 17144
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
min: 6386 avg: 6666 median: 6400 (12%) max: 7212 Points
15759 Points (30%)
min: 9344 avg: 9962.8 median: 9873 (19%) max: 10375 Points
T7500 4096 9344
9860
HP Compaq 8710w T9500 4096 625 / 800 MHz 512MB GDDR3 8.14.11.0163 (Forceware 101.63) 9873
HP Compaq 8710w T7700 2048 625 / 800 MHz 512MB GDDR3 ForceWare 174.70 10362
Dell Precision M6300 T9300 3072 625 / 800 MHz 256MB GDDR3, 512MB mit TurboCache 10375
3DMark 06 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M min: 3900 avg: 3903 median: 3903 (8%) max: 3906 Points
Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
min: 10430 avg: 10847 median: 11000 (23%) max: 11111 Points
Standard 1280x1024
T9600 4096 1024MB 10430
QX9300 4096 11000
Lenovo Thinkpad W700 QX9300 4096 550 / 799 MHz 1024MB 7.15.11.7695 / Forceware 176.95 11111
+ NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M min: 4535 avg: 4622.5 median: 4622 (10%) max: 4710 Points
T7500 4096 4535
4710 Standard 1280x1024
HP Compaq 8710w T9500 4096 625 / 800 MHz 512MB GDDR3 8.14.11.0163 (Forceware 101.63) 4798
HP Compaq 8710w T7700 2048 625 / 800 MHz 512MB GDDR3 ForceWare 174.70 5033 1280x800
Dell Precision M6300 T9300 3072 625 / 800 MHz 256MB GDDR3, 512MB mit TurboCache 5608
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3ds Max 1280x1024
25.5 fps (53%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia 1280x1024
32 fps (68%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight 1280x1024
34.6 fps (74%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya 1280x1024
59.6 fps (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer 1280x1024
29.8 fps (58%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks 1280x1024
54.6 fps (81%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter 1280x1024
22 fps (58%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX 1280x1024
26.4 fps (55%)
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M Cinebench R10 - Shading 32Bit
4481 Points (22%)
Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
min: 3899 avg: 4670 median: 4885 (24%) max: 5226 Points
HP Compaq 8710w T7700 2048 625 / 800 MHz 512MB GDDR3 ForceWare 174.70 3899
Dell Precision M6300 T9300 3072 625 / 800 MHz 256MB GDDR3, 512MB mit TurboCache 4885
HP Compaq 8710w T9500 4096 625 / 800 MHz 512MB GDDR3 8.14.11.0163 (Forceware 101.63) 5226
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M Cinebench R11.5 - OpenGL 64Bit
29.8 Points (18%)
Sager 9260 Q9550 29.77
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M → 100% Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M → 123% Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M → 124%
-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Quadro FX 1600M:
13.6 14.4 [X] HP Compaq 8710w Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 1600M
15.9 ~ 15 fps
Quadro FX 1600M:
»
Quadro FX 1600M:
13.2 [X] HP Compaq 8710w Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 1600M
15.6 ~ 14 fps
Quadro FX 1600M:
»
Quadro FX 1600M:
36 37 ~ 37 fps
Quadro FX 1600M:
21 23 ~ 22 fps
Quadro FX 1600M:
»
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
259 fps
182%
Quadro FX 1600M:
444 [X] HP Compaq 8710w Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 1600M
476 493 ~ 471 fps
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
143 fps
113%
Quadro FX 1600M:
153 162 167 [X] HP Compaq 8710w Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 1600M
~ 161 fps
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
63 fps
90%
Quadro FX 1600M:
56 56 59 [X] HP Compaq 8710w Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 1600M
~ 57 fps
Quadro FX 1500M:
»
Quadro FX 1600M:
»
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
114.5 fps
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
113.6 fps
149%
Quadro FX 1600M:
164.3 174 ~ 169 fps
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
113.9 fps
143%
Quadro FX 1600M:
160.6 165 ~ 163 fps
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
109.3 fps
Quadro FX 1500M:
»
Quadro FX 1600M:
»
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
380.7 fps
144%
Quadro FX 1600M:
548.9 [X] HP Compaq 8710w Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 2.4GHz
Quadro FX 1600M
fps
Quadro FX 1500M:
»
Quadro FX 1600M:
»
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M → 100% Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M → 136%
v1.8.1a
#0 checking url part for id 7 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 885 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 183 +0s ... 0s
#3 Did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 01 Dec 2019 16:06:44 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#4 start showIntegratedCPUs +0.027s ... 0.028s
#5 got avg benchmarks for devices +0.031s ... 0.059s
#6 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 0.079s
#7 Before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.079s
#8 Got 49 rows for game benchmarks. +0.015s ... 0.094s
#9 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.094s
#10 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.097s
#11 return log +0.023s ... 0.12s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)
Top 10 Laptops Multimedia , Budget Multimedia , Gaming , Budget Gaming , Lightweight Gaming , Business , Budget Office , Workstation , Subnotebooks , Ultrabooks , Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros , under 500 USD/Euros , 1.000 USD/Euros
Best Displays , for University Students
Top 10 Smartphones Smartphones , Phablets , ≤5-inch , Camera Smartphones Notebookcheck's Top 10 Smartphones under 160 Euros