Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M is the version of 7900 GS video card for notebooks, which is optimized for CAD and professional 3D-applications. Technically, it has the same or similar chip (G71 architecture), but with other Bios and support for professional drivers.

The gaming performance is clearly worse than the 7900 GS (because of the application optimizing). Nonetheless, the most modded drivers can be used, so the Quadro FX 1500M is more a 7900 GS (for the operating system).

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

► remove from comparison

The Nvidia GeForce FX 3700M is a professional high-end workstation graphics card for laptops. It is manufactured in 65nm and is based on the G92 core with all 128 shaders enabled. The GPU is most comparable to the consumer GeForce GTX 280M with the largest difference being the manufacturing process (65nm of the 3700M vs 55nm of the 280M). The immediate successor to the 3700M is the Quadro FX 3800M, which is based on the GeForce GTX 285M but with higher clock rates and relatively similar power consumption demands.

show full text
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500MNVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameG71GLMNB9E-GLM3
ArchitectureG7xG9x
Pipelines20 / 7 Pixel- / Vertexshader128 - unified
Core Speed375 MHz550 MHz
Memory Speed500 MHz800 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB1024 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption20 Watt75 Watt
Transistors278 Million754 Million
technology90 nm65 nm
Features90nmOpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement18.04.2006 14.08.2008
InformationPCI-E, 90nm
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.de/page/quadrofx_go.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...
Shader Speed1375 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
5053 Points (4%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
4326 Points (3%)
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
26279 Points (27%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 14650     avg: 15283     median: 15283 (8%)     max: 15916 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 6386     avg: 6666     median: 6400 (9%)     max: 7212 Points
15759 Points (22%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
3DMark 06
min: 3900     avg: 3903     median: 3903 (6%)     max: 3906 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
3DMark 06
4074 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
min: 10430     avg: 10847     median: 11000 (17%)     max: 11111 Points
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
25.5 Points (53%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
32 Points (67%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
34.6 Points (73%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
59.6 Points (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
29.8 Points (58%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
54.6 Points (81%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
22 Points (57%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
26.4 Points (54%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
4481 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
29.8 fps (11%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M → 258% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

2008
low 800x600
Quadro FX 3700M:
55.6  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3700M:
39.9  fps
high 1280x1024
Quadro FX 3700M:
19.1  fps
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3700M:
39.2  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 3700M:
45.2  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
259  fps
med. 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
143  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
63  fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
114.5  fps
med. 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
113.6  fps
high 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
113.9  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
109.3  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1500M:
380.7  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 25. 19:41:27

#0 checking url part for id 7 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 885 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 May 2022 17:25:23 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.044s ... 0.045s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.047s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#22 composed specs +0s ... 0.048s

#23 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#24 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.048s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 7 +0.03s ... 0.077s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#27 got single benchmarks 7 +0.006s ... 0.083s

#28 getting avg benchmarks for device 885 +0s ... 0.084s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#31 got single benchmarks 885 +0.005s ... 0.089s

#32 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.089s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.09s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.09s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.091s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.091s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.092s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.092s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.095s

#55 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.096s

#56 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.096s

#57 Got 13 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.098s

#58 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.098s

#59 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.099s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.099s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.1s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.101s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.102s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.103s

#73 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.103s

#74 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.103s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.104s

#76 return log +0.003s ... 0.107s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)