, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA Quadro 1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

► remove from comparison

The NVIDIA Quadro 1000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (probably the same chip like the consumer GeForce GT 540M). Compared to the 5010M, the 1000M does not support ECC memory and DP floating point calculations. According to the clock rates, the Quadro 1000M should be positioned between the GT 540M and 550M.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance for example should be significantly better than similar specified GeForce graphics cards.

The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.1 for graphic rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 1000M should offer a high performance in general purpose calculations.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 1000M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called: NVIDIA 3D Vision Pro.

To automatically switch between the processor graphics card and the Quadro, the 1000M supports Nvidia Optimus (if the laptop vendor chooses to integrate it).

The Quadro 1000M is specified at 45 Watt TDP and therefore suited for 15.6" laptops.

NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

The NVIDIA Quadro 5010M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (GF100 chip). Therefore, the 5010M is closely related to the  consumer GeForce GTX 480M. The Quadro 5010M is the successor to the Quadro 5000M and also offers ECC RAM and double-precision floating point cores.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than GeForce graphics cards with similar specifications.

The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11 or OpenGL 4.1 for graphics rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi architecture, the 5010M should offer higher levels of performance in general purpose calculations compared to its predecessors.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 5010M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called 3D Vision Pro.

To automatically switch between the integrated graphics card and the Quadro, the 5010M supports Nvidia Optimus. Note, however, that whether this feature is integrated or not depends on the notebook manufacturer.

Similar to the GeForce GTX 480M, the Quadro 5010M is specified at 100 Watt TDP. As a result, only very large laptops, such as the Clevo D901F, are able to house this high-end card.

At the time of arrival (Feb. 2011), the Quadro 5010M succeeds the older Quadrio FX 5000M as the fastest professional workstation graphic card for laptops.

NVIDIA Quadro 1000MNVIDIA Quadro 5010M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameFermiN12E-Q5
ArchitectureFermiFermi
Pipelines96 - unified384 - unified
Core Speed700 MHz450 MHz
Shader Speed1400 MHz900 MHz
Memory Speed900 MHz1300 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3GDDR5 ECC
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB4096 MB
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
technology40 nm40 nm
FeaturesOpenGl 4.1, FP32OpenGl 4.1, ECC Memory, FP64 IEEE 754
Notebook Sizemedium sizedlarge
Date of Announcement22.02.2011 22.02.2011
Transistors3000 Million
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-mobi...

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1064 Points (3%)
min: 3032     avg: 3066     median: 3066 (7%)     max: 3100 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
943 Points (2%)
2693 Points (4%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
4566 Points (4%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
12991 Points (13%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
3679 Points (3%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
11047 Points (10%)
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
40779 Points (42%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
21603 Points (11%)
52873 Points (28%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
16583 Points (24%)
24769 Points (36%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
3DMark 06
min: 7827     avg: 8312     median: 8509 (16%)     max: 8599 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 18617     avg: 19544     median: 19036 (35%)     max: 20979 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
10.1 fps (2%)
41.7 fps (8%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
13.3 fps (9%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 34.9     avg: 38.2     median: 38.2 (27%)     max: 41.4 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
16.2 fps (27%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 37.6     avg: 39.8     median: 39.8 (67%)     max: 41.9 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
25 fps (30%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 37.93     avg: 46.1     median: 46.1 (56%)     max: 54.2 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
8.3 fps (35%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 7.99     avg: 8.9     median: 8.8 (37%)     max: 9.7 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
33.5 fps (25%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 53.62     avg: 72.4     median: 72.4 (55%)     max: 91.1 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
36 fps (39%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 40.01     avg: 47.5     median: 47.5 (51%)     max: 54.9 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
11.2 fps (5%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 36.73     avg: 37.9     median: 37.9 (18%)     max: 39.1 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
15 fps (18%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 33.89     avg: 38.1     median: 38.1 (46%)     max: 42.4 fps
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.6 Points (84%)
7.5 Points (95%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.6 Points (84%)
7.5 Points (95%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6771 (32%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
6620 (31%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
26.2 fps (11%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
min: 65.06     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (29%)     max: 69.95 fps

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 1000M → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 5010M → 227% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
100%
Quadro 1000M:
140.5  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 1000M:
54  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 1000M:
34.6  fps
305%
Quadro 5010M:
105.4 fps  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 1000M:
12.7  fps
278%
Quadro 5010M:
35.3 fps  fps
Crysis 2

Crysis 2

2011
high 1366x768
Quadro 5010M:
81.6 fps  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
28.2 fps  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro 5010M:
105  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
72.8  fps
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
100%
Quadro 1000M:
450  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 1000M:
192  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 1000M:
132  fps
203%
Quadro 5010M:
268.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 1000M:
73  fps
222%
Quadro 5010M:
162.3  fps
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
100%
Quadro 1000M:
64.2  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 1000M:
50.3  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 1000M:
41.5  fps
209%
Quadro 5010M:
86.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 1000M:
25.1  fps
207%
Quadro 5010M:
51.9  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro 5010M:
98.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
52.7  fps
high 1600x900
Quadro 5010M:
37.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
14.6  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro 5010M:
88.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
45.3  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro 5010M:
93.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
62.5  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
high 1366x768
Quadro 5010M:
64.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
41.9  fps
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
high 1360x768
Quadro 5010M:
120.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
73.3  fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
high 1366x768
Quadro 5010M:
108.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 5010M:
67  fps
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
100%
Quadro 1000M:
121  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro 1000M:
100  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 1000M:
53.2  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 1000M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 5010M → 237%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 243%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 05. 01:51:47

#0 checking url part for id 2437 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2429 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 03 Aug 2021 17:21:24 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 2437 +0.024s ... 0.032s

#8 got single benchmarks 2437 +0.007s ... 0.039s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 2429 +0s ... 0.04s

#10 got single benchmarks 2429 +0.005s ... 0.045s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.058s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.058s

#14 Got 39 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.063s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.063s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.066s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.009s ... 0.075s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.075s

#19 return log +0.047s ... 0.121s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)