Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro 1000M vs NVIDIA NVS 4200M

NVIDIA Quadro 1000M

► remove from comparison

The NVIDIA Quadro 1000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (probably the same chip like the consumer GeForce GT 540M). Compared to the 5010M, the 1000M does not support ECC memory and DP floating point calculations. According to the clock rates, the Quadro 1000M should be positioned between the GT 540M and 550M.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance for example should be significantly better than similar specified GeForce graphics cards.

The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.1 for graphic rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 1000M should offer a high performance in general purpose calculations.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 1000M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called: NVIDIA 3D Vision Pro.

To automatically switch between the processor graphics card and the Quadro, the 1000M supports Nvidia Optimus (if the laptop vendor chooses to integrate it).

The Quadro 1000M is specified at 45 Watt TDP and therefore suited for 15.6" laptops.

NVIDIA NVS 4200M

► remove from comparison

The NVIDIA NVS 4200M (or NVIDIA Quadro NVS 4200M) is a business graphics card for laptops which is most likely based on the same core as the GeForce GT 520M. According to the Nvidia Homepage, the 4200M is allowed to be clocked up to 810MHz, compared to the 550MHz of the GT 520M. However, the clock rates of the NVS 4200M in the Dell Latitude 6420 is similar to the GT 520M.

The NVS series is optimized for business applications and stability and may therefore perform a bit worse in games due to the special drivers and BIOS optimizations.

The gaming performance may be a bit worse compared to similar clocked GeForce cards due to the stability optimizations of the NVS. In theory the raw performance of the chip is enough to run current games of 2010/2011 in low-medium details and resolutions.

As the GT 520M, the NVS4200M should support PureVideo HD (VP4) to accelerate HD videos and OpenCL / CUDA / DirectX Compute to use the render cores for other applications.

The graphics card supports HDMI 1.3 up to 1920x1080 and Multimode DisplayPort up to 2560x1600. Furthermore, 7.1 channel HD audio can be trasmitted over the HDMI port.

NVIDIA Quadro 1000MNVIDIA NVS 4200M
NVS Series
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
NVS 4200M 48 @ 0.81 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
NVS 3100M compare 16 @ 0.6 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
NVS 2100M compare 16 @ 0.54 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
CodenameFermi
ArchitectureFermiFermi
Pipelines96 - unified48 - unified
Core Speed700 MHz810 MHz
Shader Speed1400 MHz1620 MHz
Memory Speed900 MHz800 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3DDR3
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB1024 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Power Consumption45 Watt
technology40 nm40 nm
FeaturesOpenGl 4.1, FP32
Notebook Sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Date of Announcement22.02.2011 22.02.2011
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1064 Points (1%)
min: 507     avg: 605     median: 572 (1%)     max: 806 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
943 Points (1%)
min: 496     avg: 519     median: 507 (0%)     max: 541 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
4566 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
min: 2142     avg: 2309     median: 2298 (1%)     max: 2443 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
3679 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
min: 1819     avg: 1896     median: 1917 (1%)     max: 1969 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
40779 Points (42%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
21603 Points (11%)
min: 12527     avg: 12674     median: 12634 (7%)     max: 12860 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
16583 Points (18%)
min: 9189     avg: 9507     median: 9462 (10%)     max: 9801 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
3DMark 06
min: 7827     avg: 8312     median: 8509 (11%)     max: 8599 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
min: 4601     avg: 4906     median: 4929 (6%)     max: 5118 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
10.1 fps (2%)
min: 7.1     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (1%)     max: 7.8 fps
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
13.3 fps (8%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
min: 1.99     avg: 2.4     median: 2.1 (1%)     max: 3.29 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
16.2 fps (9%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
min: 0.7     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (0%)     max: 0.97 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
25 fps (19%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
min: 4.4     avg: 5.4     median: 5.1 (4%)     max: 6.68 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
8.3 fps (10%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
min: 0.82     avg: 1     median: 1 (1%)     max: 1.12 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
33.5 fps (25%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
min: 3.04     avg: 4.9     median: 5.4 (4%)     max: 6.27 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
36 fps (39%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
min: 6.79     avg: 8.6     median: 9 (10%)     max: 9.97 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
11.2 fps (5%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
min: 5.1     avg: 5.7     median: 5.8 (3%)     max: 6.36 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
15 fps (8%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
min: 2.6     avg: 3.2     median: 3.1 (2%)     max: 3.71 fps
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.6 Points (84%)
min: 6.4     avg: 6.4     median: 6.4 (81%)     max: 6.5 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.6 Points (84%)
min: 4.7     avg: 5.5     median: 5.6 (71%)     max: 6.4 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6771 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
min: 4816     avg: 5327     median: 5185 (4%)     max: 6163 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
26.2 fps (9%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA NVS 4200M
min: 15.5     avg: 16.1     median: 16.1 (5%)     max: 16.71 fps

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 1000M → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA NVS 4200M → 47% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
NVS 4200M:
47.7  fps
med. 1366x768
NVS 4200M:
17.6  fps
high 1366x768
NVS 4200M:
11.7  fps
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
100%
Quadro 1000M:
140.5  fps
68%
NVS 4200M:
95  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 1000M:
54  fps
67%
NVS 4200M:
36  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 1000M:
34.6  fps
69%
NVS 4200M:
24  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 1000M:
12.7  fps
95%
NVS 4200M:
12  fps
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
100%
Quadro 1000M:
450  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 1000M:
192  fps
58%
NVS 4200M:
108.6 116 ~ 112 fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 1000M:
132  fps
57%
NVS 4200M:
74 76 ~ 75 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 1000M:
73  fps
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
100%
Quadro 1000M:
64.2  fps
64%
NVS 4200M:
41  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 1000M:
50.3  fps
56%
NVS 4200M:
24.7 31 ~ 28 fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 1000M:
41.5  fps
53%
NVS 4200M:
19.1 25 ~ 22 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 1000M:
25.1  fps
56%
NVS 4200M:
14  fps
low 1024x768
NVS 4200M:
149  fps
med. 1360x768
NVS 4200M:
30  fps
high 1360x768
NVS 4200M:
19  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
med. 1024x768
NVS 4200M:
22 25.5 ~ 24 fps
high 1366x768
NVS 4200M:
14 16.1 ~ 15 fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
NVS 4200M:
33  fps
high 1366x768
NVS 4200M:
23  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
med. 1024x768
NVS 4200M:
43.2 48 ~ 46 fps
high 1360x768
NVS 4200M:
19 19.1 ~ 19 fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
NVS 4200M:
100.7  fps
ultra 1280x1024
NVS 4200M:
12.9  fps
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
100%
Quadro 1000M:
121  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro 1000M:
100  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 1000M:
53.2  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 1000M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA NVS 4200M → 64%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 65%

NVIDIA Quadro 1000MNVIDIA NVS 4200M
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Anno 207047.717.611.7
Dirt 3140.55434.5512.6895362412
Fifa 114501921327311275
Mafia 264.250.341.525.141282214
StarCraft 21493019
Risen2415
Need for Speed Shift3323
Colin McRae: DIRT 24619
Anno 1404100.712.9
NVIDIA Quadro 1000MNVIDIA NVS 4200M
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1
2

2

1

2

1
2

1






< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
2
1
3
4
1
7

1
3








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 27. 19:19:53

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2437 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 2439 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751044793s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Jun 2025 05:20:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.016s ... 0.017s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.017s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 2437 +0.015s ... 0.032s

#9 got single benchmarks 2437 +0.004s ... 0.036s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 2439 +0s ... 0.037s

#11 got single benchmarks 2439 +0.007s ... 0.044s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.044s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.017s ... 0.062s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.062s

#15 Got 47 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.065s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.065s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.065s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.069s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.069s

#20 return log +0.002s ... 0.071s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)