Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N2940 vs Intel Celeron N4020

Intel Celeron N2940

► remove from comparison Intel N2940

The Intel Celeron N2940 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.83 - 2.25 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs. The N2940 supports Quick Sync as well as Wireless Display.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock and the 4 cores, the Celeron N2940 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. Depending on the benchmark, the N2940 is similar to or slightly faster than the AMD Kabini APU A4-5000. For most everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of 313 - 854 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts (4.5 W SDP - Scenario Design Power). Thus, the chip can be used in compact (and sometimes even passively cooled) subnotebooks and tablets.

Intel Celeron N4020

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4020

The Intel Celeron N4020 is a slow dual-core processor (SoC) of the Gemini Lake refresh product family; as such, it is designed for use in laptops and mini-PCs of the most affordable flavor. The Celeron was launched in Q4 2019. Its CPU cores run at 1.1 GHz to 2.8 GHz, the latter being a moderate 200 MHz upgrade over the preceding N4000 chip. Other key specs include a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (up to 2,400 MHz and up to 8 GB, with independent reports claiming as much as 32 GB will work just fine) and an integrated UHD 600 graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Just like Apollo Lake family products, the ever-popular N3350 included, the N4020 is manufactured on a really old, as of late 2023, 14 nm process. What makes the newer Celerons different are the slightly improved processor cores with double the L2 cache and also, somewhat counterintuitively, a reduction in physical size.

The Goldmont Plus microarchitecture is not much different from what was used in Gemini Lake processors like the N4000. A relatively large 4 MB L2 cache features prominently on the rather short list of N4020's strong sides, allowing for a marginal increase in performance-per-MHz figures compared to processors of previous generations. Still, Gemini Lake refresh processors are a clear step down from Core i3/i5/i7/i9 series processors, both in performance and in features.

The N4020 has six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes at its disposal. While very few N4020-based SBCs, nettops and laptops feature an NVMe M.2 slot, you can use an NVMe SSD as a boot drive with this processor (read/write rates will be limited to 2 GB/s, though). Furthermore, partial Wi-Fi 5 support is built into the CPU. The Celeron also supports up to eight USB 3.0 ports and two SATA III storage devices.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. They solder it straight to the motherboard for good (BGA1090 socket interface).

Performance

While slightly faster than the outgoing Celeron N4000, the average N4020 in our extensive database only just manages to match the N6211, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. These three chips deliver multi-thread CB R15, CB R20 and CB R23 scores that are so low, they lag behind a single-thread score of any half-decent CPU such as an i5-1135G7. In other words, these Celeron N chips are good enough for basic tasks only such as word processing and Web browsing with two or three tabs open at a time.

The Celeron N4120, a quad-core chip with a similar name, has little trouble leaving the N4020 behind in most workloads - which is not to say it is a fast CPU.

Jacking the long-term power limit value up to something like 9 W will help improve system responsiveness noticeably.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, much like the  HD Graphics 520 or the UHD Graphics 615 or other widespread Intel iGPUs found in Core i3/i5/i7/i9 processors of generations six to ten.

Just like the HD Graphics 500, the UHD Graphics 600 is DX12 compatible. The iGPU's 12 EUs can run at up to 650 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 iGPU that certain 10th Gen Ice Lake processors have packs 64 EUs, for reference. As a low-end solution, UHD Graphics 600 will let you play some seriously old titles, but that's about as far as its talents go.

Perhaps more importantly, this graphics solution can drive up to 3 monitors with resolutions as high as 4096x2160@60. Furthermore, it will have no trouble HW-decoding AVC, HEVC and VP9-encoded videos. The newer AV1 codec will be decoded via software, with the limited CPU horsepower imposing a limit on video resolutions that can be played back without stuttering. 1080p60 videos are out of reach while 720p25 videos run fine, to give you an example.

Power consumption

The low 6 W TDP (also known as the long-term Power Limit) makes it easy for laptop makers to ditch the fan. Performance sustainability will be poor unless the long-term Power Limit is set to a value higher than the default 6 W and a fan is available to aid in heat dissipation.

The Celeron N4020 is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Celeron N2940Intel Celeron N4020
CodenameBay Trail-MGemini Lake refresh
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Gemini Lake
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake refresh
Intel Celeron N2940 « 1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2930 compare1.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2815 compare1.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2807 compare1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 compare2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 compare1.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4125 compare2 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4120 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4025 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N4020 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1830 - 2250 MHz1100 - 2800 MHz
L1 Cache224 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 2
TDP7.5 Watt6 Watt
Technology22 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketFCBGA1170BGA1090
FeaturesHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 854 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, SpeedstepDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 854 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
TDP Turbo PL215 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4020
15.6 pt (26%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
616 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
308 Points (13%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 149.8     avg: 162.4     median: 162.4 (18%)     max: 175 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 242     avg: 279     median: 279 (1%)     max: 316 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 89     avg: 110.5     median: 110.5 (1%)     max: 132 Points
min: 110.1     avg: 127.1     median: 127.1 (1%)     max: 144.1 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 35     avg: 35.5     median: 35.5 (10%)     max: 36 Points
min: 68.6     avg: 73.8     median: 73.8 (20%)     max: 78.9 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.57     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (2%)     max: 1.62 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.4 Points (10%)
0.9 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1150 Points (7%)
2184 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3958 Points (3%)
4427 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N2940 +
5784 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N2940 +
1663 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
867 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
29.2 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
766 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
4498 MIPS (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2456 MIPS (29%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
9.4 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
46.9 fps (1%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 0.73     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.92 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.2 GB/s (1%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
4064 Seconds (29%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.5 sec (33%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2191 Points (5%)
2495 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
27.5 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
61.2 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1566 s (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1635 Points (4%)
min: 1560     avg: 1650     median: 1650 (4%)     max: 1740 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N2940 +
17767 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1257 Points (3%)
1286 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 1852     avg: 1853     median: 1853 (3%)     max: 1854 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
476 Points (2%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
400 Points (10%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
706 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 319     avg: 418.7     median: 462 (18%)     max: 475 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 663     avg: 786     median: 836 (1%)     max: 858 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1989     avg: 2004     median: 2004 (20%)     max: 2019 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3404     avg: 3433     median: 3433 (3%)     max: 3462 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2300     avg: 2488     median: 2488 (3%)     max: 2676 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 49.4     avg: 55.3     median: 55.3 (15%)     max: 61.1 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 76.2     avg: 80.2     median: 80.2 (14%)     max: 84.2 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
310 Points (12%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.5 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
6.9 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
14.3 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2940 → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4020 → 136% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 11. 11:17:27

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6009 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11535 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760174247s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 Oct 2025 05:18:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 6009 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 6009 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11535 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#10 got single benchmarks 11535 +0.015s ... 0.035s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.035s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.03s ... 0.065s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.067s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)