Notebookcheck Logo
Motorola Moto G77 in review

Motorola Moto G77 Smartphone Review: The brightest mid-range AMOLED phone is elegant and slim

Streamlined and slowed down.

The Motorola Moto G77 shows just how much mid-range smartphone you can get around the €280 mark. You get a thin Pantone chassis, bright AMOLED 120 Hz display, powerful speakers, and a long battery life. While these are good to have, our review shows where its flaws lie.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Vaidyanathan Subramaniam (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇩🇪
5G Android ARM Smartphone

Verdict on the Motorola Moto G77

The Motorola Moto G77 is an attractive and slim mid-range smartphone. The phone features good speakers and a highly bright display while equally offering good battery life.

Thanks to Motorola's design philosophy with Pantone colors and a faux leather back, the phone has a high-quality look that doesn't warp together with a great finish.

However, the Moto G77 lacks any form of complete water ingress protection, and you won't find a microSD reader either. So, you will have to make do with the 256 GB storage, which is unfortunately not particularly fast.

The SoC could also do with more power for a much smoother operation.

The fingerprint sensor is positioned very low on the screen, but it works reliably. The software is kept up to date for four years, which does not actually comply with EU regulations.

The cameras take decent pictures, but you shouldn't expect too much flexibility.

Overall, the Motorola Moto G77 is a slim and attractive mid-range phone with good battery run times that could do with a little more performance.

Pros

+ slim, light, elegant
+ very good workmanship
+ very bright and color-fast AMOLED
+ powerful stereo speakers
+ long battery life
+ stable cell phone reception
+ eSIM support
+ Reliable fingerprint sensor
+ bright main camera

Cons

- no microSD memory expansion
- Mass storage only moderately fast
- weak SoC
- slow WLAN
- PWM flickering around 100 Hz
- Camera without 4K video
- only 4 years of updates
- little sustainability data

Price and availability

Prices for the Motorola Moto G77 start at around €280 at online retailers such as Amazon.de. The Moto G77 is not yet available in the US, but the somewhat equivalent Moto G Power 2026 can be purchased unlocked for $299.99 on Amazon US.

Amazon Logo
  • $210.00
    Motorola Moto G75 5G (XT2437-2) Dual Sim 8+256GB | International Model | GSM Factory Unlocked | Compatible with Metro PCS, T-Mobile, Mint, Tello | 6.78" LCD Display | 50MP Camera - (Gray)
  • $110.87
    Motorola Moto G Power 5G | 2024 | Unlocked | Made for US 8/128GB | 50MP Camera | Midnight Blue
  • $215.41
    Motorola Moto G Power - 2025 | Unlocked | Made for US 8/128GB | 50MP Camera | Leaf Green

Specifications

Motorola Moto G77 (Moto G70 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Dimensity 6400 8c/8t, 2 x 2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A76, 6 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.78 inch 19.6:9, 2772 x 1272 pixel 450 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 7i, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 200 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration, gyroscope, compass, proximity
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B71), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n71/​n75/​n77/​n78), LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.3 x 164.2 x 77.4 ( = 0.29 x 6.46 x 3.05 in)
Battery
5200 mAh Lithium-Ion, 30 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix f/​1.7, phase shift AF, dual LED flash, Videos @1440p/​30fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, Contrast-AF, wide angle (Camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix Videos @1440p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), silicone bumper, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, eSIM support, IP64 certified, MIL-STD-810H certified, SAR: 0.90W/​kg (head), 1.35W/​kg (body), fanless
Weight
182 g ( = 6.42 oz / 0.4 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
300 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Build and features: Pantone colors and eSIM

Motorola's design philosophy relies on Pantone colors. These usually color a back made of a synthetic leather-like material as is the case with our Moto G77 unit. Available color options include Black Olive, a slightly brownish black shade, and Shaded Spruce, a blue-green variant.

The chassis is very well made and can hardly be twisted. Compared to the predecessor Moto G75, our test device is significantly slimmer and lighter even though it has slightly more battery capacity.

The Moto G77 is not really water resistant, it is only protected against splash water.

8 GB RAM and 256 GB of storage are installed in the smartphone, which puts it on par with the rest of its class. Memory expansion via microSD is not possible. In addition to a nano-SIM, an eSIM can also be used.

Motorola Moto G77
Motorola Moto G77
Motorola Moto G77
Motorola Moto G77
Motorola Moto G77
Motorola Moto G77

Size comparison

166.1 mm / 6.54 in 77.2 mm / 3.04 in 8.3 mm / 0.3268 in 205 g0.4519 lbs163.6 mm / 6.44 in 76 mm / 2.99 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 199 g0.4387 lbs164.2 mm / 6.46 in 77.4 mm / 3.05 in 7.3 mm / 0.2874 in 182 g0.4012 lbs164 mm / 6.46 in 75.42 mm / 2.97 in 7.35 mm / 0.2894 in 178 g0.3924 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Communication and operation: Rather slow WLAN

You have to make do with Wi-Fi 5 with Moto G77. Surprising, considering that the Moto G75 already offered Wi-Fi 6, and the OnePlus Nord CE 5 showed that Wi-Fi 6 is possible with higher speeds in this price range. 

Unfortunately, you will have to make do with typical Wi-Fi 5 speeds with MIMO 1x1. We also observed slight drops during our test with the Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router.

Many 4G and 5G frequencies are available for mobile communications. The reception was mostly stable during our test with random samples.

The fingerprint reader is hidden behind the screen and is positioned quite far down. This is good for small hands but can lead to problems with protruding phone cases. 

The reader reacts quickly and unlocks the phone with short processing times. 2D face recognition via the front camera is also possible.

Networking
Motorola Moto G77
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
279 (min: 169) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
342 (min: 251) MBit/s ∼29%
Motorola Moto G75
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
614 (min: 224) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1434 (min: 1076) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
369 (min: 188) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
354 (min: 343) MBit/s ∼30%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
536 (min: 421) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1191 (min: 961) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
338 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
330 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼28%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
330 (min: 330) MBit/s ∼26%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
291 (min: 291) MBit/s ∼20%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
685 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
720 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1273 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1377 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼96%
050100150200250300350Tooltip
Motorola Moto G77; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø292 (169-313)
Motorola Moto G77; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø342 (251-370)

Software and sustainability: Updates for four years

Android 16 comes pre-installed and updates are planned until January 2030. System updates up to Android 19 are also planned. This is a reasonable period, but other manufacturers such as Samsung offer a significantly longer security update period.

In terms of sustainability, the phone comes in a box that uses no plastic. Otherwise, nothing is known about recycling quotas or the CO2 footprint.

Cameras: Light-sensitive but slimmed down

Front camera recording
Front camera recording

Motorola is particularly keen to impress with its main camera that sports 108 MP and a large aperture of f/1.7, so that plenty of light hits the sensor. However, the video capabilities have been reduced compared to its predecessor: 4K videos are no longer possible.

The images from the main camera actually look well-lit and offer a decent level of detail. In low light, however, the dynamic range quickly decreases in dark areas. There is also an 8 MP wide-angle camera, which does not take very detailed photos.

The 32 MP selfie camera shoots quite acceptable selfies that also show acceptable details.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera: PlantMain camera: EnvironmentMain camera: Low lightWide-angle camera
ColorChecker
12.9 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
13 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G77: 10.05 ∆E min: 3.54 - max: 18.19 ∆E
ColorChecker
14.1 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
13 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
22 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G77: 17.34 ∆E min: 11.21 - max: 22.37 ∆E

Display: Very bright and color accurate

The AMOLED screen of the Moto G77 has excellent luminosity and can therefore hold its own even in bright environments. The color reproduction is also very accurate.

However, you have to live with PWM flickering in the 100 Hz range. Sensitive people should therefore try out the screen before buying.

1498
cd/m²
1503
cd/m²
1516
cd/m²
1526
cd/m²
1558
cd/m²
1537
cd/m²
1522
cd/m²
1542
cd/m²
1536
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1558 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1526.4 cd/m² Minimum: 3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1558 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.79 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
CCT: 6489 K
Motorola Moto G77
AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8"
Motorola Moto G75
IPS, 2388x1080, 6.8"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8"
OnePlus Nord CE 5
AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8"
Screen
-71%
-25%
-22%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1558
947
-39%
979
-37%
1315
-16%
Brightness (cd/m²)
1526
946
-38%
969
-37%
1300
-15%
Brightness Distribution (%)
96
95
-1%
95
-1%
97
1%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
0.46
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.79
2.53
-220%
1.3
-65%
1.22
-54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.97
4.91
-65%
2.6
12%
2.7
9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.3
2.1
-62%
1.6
-23%
2
-54%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.237 98%
2.23 99%
2.258 97%
CCT
6489 100%
6733 97%
6688 97%
6503 100%
Contrast (:1)
2059

* ... smaller is better

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Motorola Moto G77
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3521 cd/m²
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3430 cd/m² -3%
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Motorola Moto G77
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3704 cd/m²
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3582 cd/m² -3%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 103 Hz
Amplitude: 10 %

The display backlight flickers at 103 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 103 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7999 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Minimum brightness
Minimum brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
75% brightness
75% brightness
100% brightness
100% brightness

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness)

CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN Color Space sRGB
CalMAN Color Space sRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5 ms rise
↘ 0.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8 ms rise
↘ 0.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.4 ms).

Performance, emissions, and battery life: Needs more power

The MediaTek Dimensity 6400 is quite weak on the chest and lets the Moto G77 fall somewhat behind the competition in terms of performance. It is generally sufficient for smooth operation, but there are not many reserves for demanding tasks.

The heat build-up on the casing remains very moderate even under prolonged load, and we can only detect minimal throttling in the 3DMark stress tests.

The hybrid stereo speakers sound very good and are powerful, but they become a lot more treble-heavy at full volume. If you turn the volume down a notch, you get a much fuller sound. Many audio codecs are available for wireless sound transmission via Bluetooth 5.4.

The 5,200 mAh battery is typical for the class. At just under 20 hours of battery life in our WLAN test, the Moto G77 achieves a good value and outperforms most competitors in the price range. This should easily last a day with medium use of the phone without charging.

If the phone does need to be plugged in, it will be fully charged again in around 1:30 hours thanks to 30 W charging speeds.

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3883, n=210, last 2 years)
1733 Points +116%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
1325 Points +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
1017 Points +27%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
1011 Points +26%
Motorola Moto G77
Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
802 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400
  (761 - 814, n=4)
785 Points -2%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11634, n=210, last 2 years)
5097 Points +152%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
4201 Points +108%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
2963 Points +47%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
2887 Points +43%
Motorola Moto G77
Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2022 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400
  (1983 - 2072, n=4)
2020 Points 0%
3DMark
Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
3263 Points +140%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
3034 Points +124%
Average of class Smartphone
  (270 - 13896, n=103, last 2 years)
2857 Points +111%
Motorola Moto G77
Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1357 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400
  (1214 - 1357, n=3)
1301 Points -4%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (271 - 30621, n=193, last 2 years)
11133 Points +708%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
9956 Points +623%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
3283 Points +138%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
3069 Points +123%
Motorola Moto G77
Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1377 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400
  (1210 - 1377, n=3)
1301 Points -6%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (61 - 8140, n=195, last 2 years)
2926 Points +658%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
2774 Points +619%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
864 Points +124%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
801 Points +108%
Motorola Moto G77
Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
386 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400
  (339 - 386, n=3)
366 Points -5%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 8102, n=194, last 2 years)
2909 Points +662%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
2795 Points +632%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
854 Points +124%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
793 Points +108%
Motorola Moto G77
Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
382 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400
  (328 - 382, n=3)
358 Points -6%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
69 fps +475%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 166, n=207, last 2 years)
58.6 fps +388%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
31 fps +158%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
31 fps +158%
Motorola Moto G77
Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
12 fps
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400
  (8.9 - 13, n=3)
11.3 fps -6%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
118 fps +687%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 367, n=207, last 2 years)
116.8 fps +679%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
42 fps +180%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
36 fps +140%
Motorola Moto G77
Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
15 fps
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400
  (15 - 15, n=3)
15 fps 0%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=208, last 2 years)
47.2 fps +449%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
47 fps +447%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
21 fps +144%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
19 fps +121%
Motorola Moto G77
Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
8.6 fps
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400
  (5.6 - 9.1, n=3)
7.77 fps -10%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
49 fps +731%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 146, n=207, last 2 years)
45 fps +663%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
15 fps +154%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
13 fps +120%
Motorola Moto G77
Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
5.9 fps
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400
  (5.5 - 6, n=3)
5.8 fps -2%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
21 fps +740%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.54 - 62, n=208, last 2 years)
20.8 fps +732%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
6.6 fps +164%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
5.9 fps +136%
Motorola Moto G77
Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2.5 fps
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400
  (2.4 - 2.6, n=3)
2.5 fps 0%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
1112 Points +383%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5210, n=80, last 2 years)
683 Points +197%
Motorola Moto G77
Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
230 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400
  (218 - 231, n=3)
226 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
137 Points -40%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
4496 Points +1262%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 36297, n=80, last 2 years)
2667 Points +708%
Motorola Moto G77
Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
330 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400
  (322 - 334, n=3)
329 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
138 Points -58%
Quantized NPU 1.5
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
4547 Points +2140%
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 49889, n=80, last 2 years)
3951 Points +1846%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
392 Points +93%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400
  (203 - 205, n=3)
204 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G77
Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
203 Points
CrossMark
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2856, n=116, last 2 years)
1144 Points +128%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
842 Points +68%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
737 Points +47%
Motorola Moto G77
Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
502 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400
  (n=1)
502 Points 0%
Productivity
Average of class Smartphone
  (198 - 2366, n=116, last 2 years)
1062 Points +82%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
810 Points +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
690 Points +18%
Motorola Moto G77
Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
583 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400
  (n=1)
583 Points 0%
Creativity
Average of class Smartphone
  (163 - 2123, n=116, last 2 years)
958 Points +116%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
630 Points +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
602 Points +36%
Motorola Moto G77
Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
444 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400
  (n=1)
444 Points 0%
Responsiveness
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
4177 Points +796%
Average of class Smartphone
  (239 - 13042, n=116, last 2 years)
3086 Points +562%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
893 Points +92%
Motorola Moto G77
Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
466 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400
  (n=1)
466 Points 0%
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (23.8 - 358, n=143, last 2 years)
151.9 Points +55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
147.778 Points +50%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
126.402 Points +29%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
122.3 Points +25%
Motorola Moto G77
Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
98.2 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400
  (94.3 - 98.2, n=3)
96.5 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G77Motorola Moto G75Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5GOnePlus Nord CE 5Average 256 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
60%
50%
62%
-4%
171%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
522.1
1023.1
96%
911.87
75%
1235
137%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
494.6
868.4
76%
867.34
75%
795
61%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
217.2
285.3
31%
222.77
3%
222
2%
170.8 ?(108.4 - 265, n=24)
-21%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
206.2
279.5
36%
302.72
47%
302
46%
146.2 ?(22.1 - 280, n=24)
-29%
Max. Load
 40 °C
104 F
39.2 °C
103 F
33.2 °C
92 F
 
 39.7 °C
103 F
35.9 °C
97 F
33.7 °C
93 F
 
 38.2 °C
101 F
37.1 °C
99 F
34.2 °C
94 F
 
Maximum: 40 °C = 104 F
Average: 36.8 °C = 98 F
36.2 °C
97 F
38.7 °C
102 F
37.6 °C
100 F
33.1 °C
92 F
37.5 °C
100 F
38.6 °C
101 F
31.9 °C
89 F
34.6 °C
94 F
37.6 °C
100 F
Maximum: 38.7 °C = 102 F
Average: 36.2 °C = 97 F
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 20 °C = 68 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Stress Tests

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Motorola Moto G77
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.5 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % +1%
Motorola Moto G77
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.7 %
OnePlus Nord CE 5
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97.1 % -2%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 %
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 %
012345678Tooltip
Motorola Moto G77; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø2.3 (2.28-2.31)
Motorola Moto G77; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø8.28 (8.26-8.3)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.943.42536.438.73124.129.84034.1285039.533.36326.725.48014.21310018.319.712515.616.316017.926.420013.537.925013.94531515.951.740012.752.350017.958.563024.865.680024.771.9100021.581.1125018.579.8160026.976.8200021.676.7250020.574.6315026.670.9400023.469.4500032.774.3630034.973.8800037.369.81000031.364.81250031.865.31600030.756.5SPL41.887.1N3.163.6median 21.6median 65.6Delta7.112.837.143.833.536.132.529.13230.832.833.125.724.716.721.51730.718.138.317.743.818.347.217.751.417.755.81657.517.362.924.869.723.668.918.873.317.476.918.278.216.580.314.281.515.879.618.376.520.874.819.478.219.279.220.282.12274.91954.731.4901.579.3median 18.2median 74.81.212.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G77OnePlus Nord CE 5
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G77 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (17.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

OnePlus Nord CE 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
49h 58min
WiFi Websurfing
20h 02min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 14min
Motorola Moto G77
5200 mAh
Motorola Moto G75
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
5520 mAh
OnePlus Nord CE 5
5200 mAh
Battery runtime
-2%
-17%
-15%
Reader / Idle (h)
50
50.4
1%
36.6
-27%
WiFi v1.3 (h)
20
19.6
-2%
19
-5%
16.9
-15%
Load (h)
5.2
5
-4%
4.2
-19%
H.264 (h)
22.2
21.1

Notebookcheck's overall impressions of the Motorola Moto G77

The Motorola Moto G77 is stylish, quite light, and features good speakers and a bright screen. However, there is still room for improvement in terms of performance.

Motorola Moto G77 in review. Test device provided by Motorola Germany.
Motorola Moto G77 in review. Test device provided by Motorola Germany.

Motorola Moto G77 - 03/01/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
72 / 75 → 95%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
47 / 69 → 68%
Weight
90%
Battery
92%
Display
94%
Games Performance
5 / 55 → 10%
Application Performance
59 / 85 → 70%
AI Performance
15%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
65 / 90 → 72%
Camera
69%
Average
60%
77%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
5%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
50%
Repairability
48%
Software Updates
56.7%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 41.6%

Potential alternatives in comparison

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
76.7%
Motorola Moto G77
Motorola Moto G77
Mediatek Dimensity 6400 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
List Price: 300€182 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.78"
2772x1272
450 PPI
AMOLED
2.
77.4%
Motorola Moto G75
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
List Price: 299€205 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.78"
2388x1080
387 PPI
IPS
3.
76.5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon: $339.99
List Price: 300€
178 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.77"
2392x1080
388 PPI
AMOLED
4.
80.8%
OnePlus Nord CE 5
OnePlus Nord CE 5
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon:
List Price: 349€
199 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.77"
2392x1080
388 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google

No comments for this article

Got questions or something to add to our article? Even without registering you can post in the comments!
No comments for this article / reply

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Motorola Moto G77 Smartphone Review: The brightest mid-range AMOLED phone is elegant and slim
Florian Schmitt, 2026-03- 4 (Update: 2026-03- 4)