Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M2 Pro vs AMD Ryzen 9 4900H vs Apple M1 Max

Apple M2 Pro

► remove from comparison Apple M2 Pro

The Apple M2 Pro is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the early 2023 MacBook Pro 14 and 16-inch models. It offers all 12 cores available in the chip divided in eight performance cores (P-cores) and four power-efficiency cores (E-cores). The E-cores clock with up to 3.4 GHz, the P-Cores up to 3.7 GHz (mostly 3.3 GHz in multi-threaded workloads and 3.4 GHz in single threaded).

The big cores (codename Avalanche) offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 36 MB shared L2 cache (up from 24 MB in the M1 Pro). The four efficiency cores (codename Blizzard) are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. CPU and GPU can both use the 24 MB SLC (System Level Cache). 

The unified memory (16 or 32 GB LPDDR5-6400) next to the chip is connected by a 256 Bit memory controller (200 GB/s bandwidth) and can be used by the GPU and CPU.

Apple states that the M2 Pro has a 25% higher performance than the M1 Pro in Xcode compiling.

The integrated graphics card in the M1 Pro offers all 19 cores.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine (faster than M1 Pro), a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), a unified memory architecture, Thunderbolt 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders (including ProRes).

The M2 Pro is manufactured in 5 nm at TSMC (second generation) and integrates 40 billion transistors. 

AMD Ryzen 9 4900H

► remove from comparison AMD R9 4900H

The AMD Ryzen 9 4900H is a mobile SoC for big laptops based on the Renoir architecture. At the time of announcement in March 2020 it is the fastest model of the 4000H series. The R9 4900H integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3.3 (guaranteed base clock) to  4.4 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in the modern 7 nm process at TSMC and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips

According to our information, the Ryzen 9 4900H is only slightly faster than the Ryzen 7 4800H. The CPU is clocked 400 MHz (base +14%) to 200 MHz (boost +5%) higher, but the gains greatly depend on the cooling and TDP settings. Compared to Intel chips, the i9-9980HK top model should be comparable. That means the Ryzen 9 4900H should be able to handle all demanding tasks and gaming.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 integrated graphics card with 8 CUs. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 12 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 45 Watt (default). That means the chip is intended for big and relatively heavy laptops.

Apple M1 Max

► remove from comparison Apple M1 Max

The Apple M1 Max is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the late 2021 MacBook Pro 14 and 16-inch models. It offers all 10 cores available in the chip divided in eight performance cores (P-cores with 600 - 3220 MHz) and two power-efficiency cores (E-cores with 600 - 2064 MHz). There is no Turbo Boost for single cores or short burst periods. The cores are similar to the cores in the Apple M1.

The big cores (codename Firestorm) offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 24 MB shared L2 cache (up from 12 MB in the M1). The four efficiency cores (codename Icestorm) are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. CPU and GPU can both use the 48 MB SLC (System Level Cache). The efficiency cores (E cluster) clock with 600 - 2064 MHz, the performance cores (P cluster) with 600 - 3228 MHz.

The unified memory (32 or 64 GB LPDDR5-6400) next to the chip is connected by a 512 bit memory controller (200 GB/s bandwidth) and can be used by the GPU and CPU. This is the main difference to the M1 Pro and the CPU performance is quite similar.

The biggest difference to the M1 Pro is the bigger integrated GPU with 24 or 32 cores (up from 16).

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine, a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), a unified memory architecture, Thunderbolt 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders (including two ProRes engines).

The M1 Pro is manufactured in 5 nm at TSMC and integrates 57 billion transistors. The peak power consumption of the chip was advertised around 30W for CPU intensive tasks. 

ModelApple M2 ProAMD Ryzen 9 4900HApple M1 Max
SeriesApple M2AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Apple M1
Series: M1
Apple M2 Max2.42 - 3.7 GHz12 / 12 cores48 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro « 2.42 - 3.5 GHz12 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core2.42 - 3.7 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M22.42 - 3.48 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H « 3.3 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H2.9 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
Apple M1 Max « 2.06 - 3.22 GHz10 / 10 cores48 MB L3
Apple M1 Pro2.06 - 3.22 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core2.06 - 3.22 GHz8 / 8 cores16 MB L3
Apple M12.06 - 3.22 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2424 - 3504 MHz3300 - 4400 MHz2060 - 3220 MHz
L1 Cache3.3 MB512 KB2.9 MB
L2 Cache36 MB4 MB28 MB
L3 Cache24 MB8 MB48 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 128 / 1610 / 10
Transistors40000 Million57000 Million
Technology5 nm7 nm5 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction SetDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA, SHAARMv8 Instruction Set
iGPUApple M2 Pro 19-Core GPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
Chip AI15.8 TOPS INT811 TOPS INT8
ArchitectureARMx86ARM
Announced
CodenameRenoir-H (Zen 2)
TDP45 Watt
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketFP6
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 4900H
31.8 pt (53%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 M2 Pro +
123 Points (69%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 M2 Pro +
1030 Points (19%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14787     avg: 14795     median: 14794.5 (14%)     max: 14802 Points
min: 11416     avg: 11604     median: 11604 (11%)     max: 11792 Points
min: 12385     avg: 12389     median: 12386 (12%)     max: 12396 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1647     avg: 1648     median: 1647.5 (69%)     max: 1648 Points
min: 1290     avg: 1294     median: 1294 (54%)     max: 1298 Points
min: 1530     avg: 1533     median: 1533 (64%)     max: 1536 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 446     avg: 446.5     median: 446.5 (49%)     max: 447 Points
min: 482     avg: 493.5     median: 493.5 (54%)     max: 505 Points
min: 390     avg: 393.3     median: 395 (43%)     max: 395 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4018     avg: 4031     median: 4031 (10%)     max: 4044 Points
min: 4233     avg: 4409     median: 4409 (11%)     max: 4585 Points
min: 2735     avg: 2746     median: 2750 (7%)     max: 2753 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2069 Points (13%)
min: 1886     avg: 1927     median: 1926.5 (12%)     max: 1967 Points
min: 1689     avg: 1691     median: 1691 (11%)     max: 1693 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
230 Points (64%)
min: 192     avg: 193     median: 193 (53%)     max: 194 Points
min: 197     avg: 202.3     median: 200 (55%)     max: 210 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
23 Points (30%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5946 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
40253 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
65380 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
10173 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
82.9 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.2 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4297 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
48976 MIPS (28%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4727 MIPS (56%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
111 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
215 fps (5%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
12.9 fps (23%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (35%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.4 GB/s (19%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 M2 Pro +
331 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
247.3 Seconds (2%)
131%
1 M1 Max +
min: 187     avg: 188.7     median: 189 (1%)     max: 190 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 M2 Pro +
0.4 sec (9%)
0.6 sec (12%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
729 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
64532 Points (50%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
12199 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63266 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
63416 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
69343 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
15719 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
20613 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
6523 Points (27%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2663 Points (64%)
1682 Points (41%)
2442 Points (59%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
14568 Points (57%)
7874 Points (31%)
12994 Points (50%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 M1 Max +
2319 Points (74%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 M1 Max +
12456 Points (51%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1952     avg: 1957     median: 1957 (74%)     max: 1961 Points
min: 1230     avg: 1232     median: 1231.5 (47%)     max: 1233 Points
min: 1764     avg: 1785     median: 1788.5 (68%)     max: 1798 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14859     avg: 14961     median: 15010 (27%)     max: 15013 Points
min: 7224     avg: 8012     median: 8012 (14%)     max: 8800 Points
min: 12563     avg: 12697     median: 12702.5 (23%)     max: 12818 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1237 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7624 Points (24%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5287 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
28402 Points (28%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
443.8 ms (1%)
767 ms (1%)
min: 404.3     avg: 459.2     median: 482.3 (1%)     max: 491.1 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 M2 Pro +
76205 Points (56%)
89%
1 M1 Max +
min: 66938     avg: 68647     median: 68029 (50%)     max: 70973 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 M2 Pro +
253 Points (70%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
386 Points (69%)
227 Points (41%)
min: 350     avg: 358.7     median: 360 (65%)     max: 366 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 M2 Pro +
min: 1797     avg: 1805     median: 1804.5 (67%)     max: 1812 Points
89%
1 M1 Max +
min: 1586     avg: 1607     median: 1615 (60%)     max: 1621 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
73.2 Watt (13%)
144%
1 M1 Max +
50.8 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
105.3 Watt (19%)
199%
1 M1 Max +
53 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M1 Max +
11.6 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
18.7 Points per Watt (14%)
171%
1 M1 Max +
31.9 Points per Watt (24%)

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 Pro → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 4900H → 75% n=12

Average Benchmarks Apple M1 Max → 87% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 06. 21:53:23

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14973 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11929 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 13843 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759780402s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 Oct 2025 05:18:30 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14973 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#9 got single benchmarks 14973 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11929 +0.004s ... 0.016s

#11 got single benchmarks 11929 +0.005s ... 0.021s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 13843 +0.001s ... 0.021s

#13 got single benchmarks 13843 +0.005s ... 0.026s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.036s ... 0.062s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.062s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)