, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

HiSilicon Kirin 820 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G

HiSilicon Kirin 820

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 820

The HiSilicon Kirin 820 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2020 and contains 8 processor cores. One fast ARM Cortex-A76 core with up to 2.36 GHz, three addition A76 cores at up to 2.22 (as the old Kirin 810) and four efficiency Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.88 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a 5G modem and a fast mid-range ARM Mali-G57 MP6 graphics card. For AI acceleration, the Kirin 820 integrates a DaVinci NPU.

The performance of the CPU part in our tests was slightly higher than the old Kirin 810 (thanks to the fast performance core). Huawei advertises 27% performance advantage for the CPU. The NPU and GPU have bigger performance gains with 73% and 38% more power.

The chip should also integrate Bluetooth 5 and WiFi 6.

The SoC is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC and therefore should be very energy efficient.

HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G

The HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G is an ARM based high-end octa-core SoC for smartphones and tablets, which was introduced with the Huawei Mate 30 Pro in late 2019. It integrates eight CPU cores in three clusters. The performance cluster contains two Cortex-A76 cores with up to 2.86 GHz, the balanced cluster contains also two Cortex-A76 cores but with only up to 2.36 GHz and finally the power saving cluster contains four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores with up to 1.95 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a neural processor (2 + 1 cores) for AI tasks and a ARM Mali-G76 MP16 GPU clocked at up to 700 MHz. Compared to the 4G version, the 5G Kirin 990 integrates a Balong 5G modem and is slightly higher clocked (2 of the 3 clusters and the GPU).

The Kirin 990 5G is produced in the modern 7nm (7FF+ with EUV) process at TSMC, the 4G version is still produced in the slightly older 7nm process as the Kirin 980.

HiSilicon Kirin 820HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
HiSilicon HiSilicon
Cortex-A76/-A55Cortex-A76/-A55
Series: Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G0 - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 compare0 - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
» HiSilicon Kirin 8201.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 810 compare1.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 980 compare0 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
» HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G0 - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 compare0 - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 8201.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 810 compare1.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 980 compare0 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
1840 - 2360 MHz <=2860 MHz
8 / 88 / 8
7 7
ARM Mali-G52 MP6 GPU, 1x Cortex-A76 up to 2.36 GHz, 3x A76 nup to 2.2 GHz, 4x A55 up to 1.84 GHz, big.LITTLE, 5G TDD/FDD, Bluetooth 5, WiFi 6, AGPS, Glonass, BaidouARM Mali-G76MP16 GPU, 2x Cortex-A76 (2.86 GHz) + 2x Cortex-A76 (2.36) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.95 GHz, big.LITTLE), Balong 5G Modem
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP6ARM Mali-G76 MP16 ( - 700 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
10300

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 820
45.5 pt (73%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 990 5G
51.2 pt (82%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
41610 Points (43%)
min: 22857     avg: 35317     median: 35840.5 (37%)     max: 46731 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
4642 Points (58%)
min: 2497     avg: 4729     median: 5326 (67%)     max: 5766 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
4637 Points (67%)
min: 4836     avg: 5318     median: 5358 (78%)     max: 5721 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4235 Points (34%)
min: 1615     avg: 2579     median: 2578.5 (21%)     max: 3542 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5223 Points (47%)
min: 4881     avg: 5643     median: 5643 (51%)     max: 6405 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
17014 Points (33%)
min: 19287     avg: 20143     median: 20143 (39%)     max: 20999 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
7277 Points (15%)
min: 9013     avg: 9236     median: 9235.5 (19%)     max: 9458 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
9969 Points (26%)
min: 11042     avg: 11669     median: 11668.5 (31%)     max: 12295 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
0 (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
0 (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
0 (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
0 (0%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3984     avg: 3992     median: 3991.5 (62%)     max: 3999
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11812     avg: 12006     median: 12005.5 (29%)     max: 12199
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3113 (39%)
min: 3915     avg: 3925     median: 3925 (49%)     max: 3935
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
9860 (12%)
min: 12324     avg: 12549     median: 12549 (16%)     max: 12774
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
769 (41%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3083 (10%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
642 (34%)
min: 755     avg: 771     median: 772.5 (41%)     max: 783
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2434 (14%)
min: 2972     avg: 3077     median: 3076.5 (18%)     max: 3183
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2254 ms (4%)
min: 1913.5     avg: 2083     median: 2066.5 (3%)     max: 2287 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
345 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
19727 Points (28%)
min: 20917     avg: 22323     median: 22343 (32%)     max: 23690 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
115 Points (37%)
min: 95     avg: 106     median: 98 (31%)     max: 124 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
68406 Points (57%)
min: 67274     avg: 75033     median: 73056 (61%)     max: 86746 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
52226 Points (42%)
min: 66292     avg: 98762     median: 103022 (83%)     max: 122714 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
117476 Points (22%)
min: 159628     avg: 167229     median: 167842 (31%)     max: 173605 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
131099 Points (47%)
min: 136344     avg: 145447     median: 145294 (53%)     max: 154856 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
369207 Points (36%)
min: 450373     avg: 486472     median: 483829 (47%)     max: 527856 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
238069 Points (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
8006 Points (42%)
min: 5869     avg: 7653     median: 7653 (40%)     max: 9437 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
22692 Points (61%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
9527 Points (62%)
min: 8512     avg: 10025     median: 10038.5 (66%)     max: 11509 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
13099 Points (66%)
min: 10628     avg: 12766     median: 12810 (64%)     max: 14814 Points

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 820 → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G → 115% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 17. 15:39:18

#0 checking url part for id 12581 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11508 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:09:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.042s ... 0.043s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.043s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12581 +0.005s ... 0.048s

#7 got single benchmarks 12581 +0.006s ... 0.053s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11508 +0.003s ... 0.056s

#9 got single benchmarks 11508 +0.011s ... 0.067s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.067s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.072s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.073s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.073s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.073s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.073s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.074s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.011s ... 0.084s

#18 return log +0.003s ... 0.088s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)