, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980

HiSilicon Kirin 810

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 810

The HiSilicon Kirin 810 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2019 and contains 8 processor cores. Two fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores with up to 2.27 GHz and six small power efficient ARM Cortex-A55 cores with up to 1.88 GHz (bigLITTLE). Furthermore, the SoC integrates a mid range graphics card called ARM Mali-G52 MP6 with 6 clusters. For AI acceleration, the Kirin 810 integrates a Ascend D100 Lite NPU (Da Vinci architecture). The integrates LTE modem supports Cat.12/13 with Dual Sim VoLTE. For photography, the Kirin 810 integrates the Kirin ISP4.0. The memory controller supports LPDDR4X at up to 2133 MHz. Furthermore, WiFi 802.11ac and Bluetooth 5.0 are integrated in the chip.

The SoC is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC and therefore should be very energy efficient.

HiSilicon Kirin 980

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 980

The HiSilicon Kirin 980 is an ARM based high-end octa-core SoC for smartphones and tablets, which was introduced with the Huawei Mate 20 Pro in late 2018. It integrates eight CPU cores in three clusters. The performance cluster contains two Cortex-A76 cores with up to 2.6 GHz, the balanced cluster contains also two Cortex-A76 cores but with only up to 1.92 GHz and finally the power saving cluster contains four small ARM Cortex-A53 cores with up to 1.8 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a modern LTE radio with Cat 21/18 (max. 1400 Mbps download, 200 Mbps upload), 2x faster dual ISP (versus 970), a LPDDR4X 2133 MHz memory controller (34.1 GB/s versus 29.9 GB/s of the Kirin 970) and a 2160p30 H.265 video encoder (2160p60 decoding). The Kirin 980 is produced in the modern 7nm process at TSMC as the first Android SoC (after the Apple A12).

HiSilicon Kirin 810HiSilicon Kirin 980
HiSilicon HiSilicon
Cortex-A76/-A55Cortex-A76/-A55
Series: Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G compare0 - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 compare0 - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820 compare1.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
» HiSilicon Kirin 8101.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 9800 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G compare0 - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 compare0 - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820 compare1.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 8101.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
» HiSilicon Kirin 9800 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
1880 - 2270 MHz <=2600 MHz
8 / 88 / 8
7 7
ARM Mali-G52 MP6 GPU, 2x Cortex-A76 (2.2 GHz) + 6x Cortex-A55 (1.88 GHz, big.LITTLE), LTE Cat-12 1400 Mbps Downlink, Cat-13 200 Mbps Uplink, Bluetooth 5, WiFi a/b/g/n/ac, AGPS, Glonass, BaidouARM Mali-G76 GPU, 2x Cortex-A76 (2.6 GHz) + 2x Cortex-A76 (1.92) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.8 GHz, big.LITTLE), 2x LTE Dual-SIM (1.4 Gbps down Cat21)
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP6ARM Mali-G76 MP10 ( - 720 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
6900

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 810
36.6 pt (59%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 980
41.7 pt (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 18123     avg: 23401     median: 24426 (25%)     max: 27654 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 3501     avg: 3731     median: 3720 (47%)     max: 3972 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 3463     avg: 3749     median: 3782 (55%)     max: 4003 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
0 Points (0%)
min: 1576     avg: 2232     median: 2231.5 (18%)     max: 2887 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
0 Points (0%)
min: 2969     avg: 5181     median: 5180.5 (47%)     max: 7392 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
0 Points (0%)
min: 15206     avg: 16273     median: 16273 (32%)     max: 17340 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
0 Points (0%)
min: 7157     avg: 7523     median: 7523 (15%)     max: 7889 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
0 Points (0%)
min: 8578     avg: 9588     median: 9587.5 (25%)     max: 10597 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
0 (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
0 (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
0 (0%)
min: 8473     avg: 8680     median: 8679.5 (14%)     max: 8886
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
0 (0%)
min: 2922     avg: 2994     median: 2994 (61%)     max: 3066
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3563     avg: 3601     median: 3601 (56%)     max: 3639
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9577     avg: 9735     median: 9734.5 (24%)     max: 9892
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2836 (36%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
7891 (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 685     avg: 696     median: 695.5 (37%)     max: 707
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2347     avg: 2474     median: 2500 (8%)     max: 2549
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 592     avg: 598     median: 598 (32%)     max: 604
min: 706     avg: 707     median: 707 (38%)     max: 708
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1890     avg: 1920     median: 1919.5 (11%)     max: 1949
min: 2553     avg: 2558     median: 2558 (15%)     max: 2563
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2471.6     avg: 2950     median: 2646.3 (4%)     max: 3730.9 ms
min: 1947.9     avg: 2176     median: 2053.6 (3%)     max: 3098.1 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 15947     avg: 16825     median: 16604 (24%)     max: 17925 Points
min: 20618     avg: 21733     median: 21603.5 (31%)     max: 23285 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 71     avg: 83.7     median: 83 (26%)     max: 97 Points
min: 86     avg: 105     median: 99 (32%)     max: 124 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 245662     avg: 250407     median: 250848 (85%)     max: 254229 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 95964     avg: 110298     median: 111697 (35%)     max: 122632 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 101537     avg: 108108     median: 106863 (65%)     max: 117617 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 268359     avg: 295586     median: 295634 (52%)     max: 322616 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 55189     avg: 62040     median: 58957 (49%)     max: 71973 Points
min: 66660     avg: 67111     median: 67110.5 (56%)     max: 67561 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 45079     avg: 53673     median: 47554 (38%)     max: 68387 Points
min: 71845     avg: 71918     median: 71917.5 (58%)     max: 71990 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 56693     avg: 68299     median: 64645 (12%)     max: 83558 Points
min: 135337     avg: 137666     median: 137666 (25%)     max: 139995 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 92494     avg: 97432     median: 94457 (34%)     max: 105346 Points
min: 136978     avg: 137360     median: 137360 (50%)     max: 137741 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 259370     avg: 291444     median: 295579 (28%)     max: 319383 Points
min: 410820     avg: 414054     median: 414054 (40%)     max: 417287 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
217082 Points (29%)
min: 246439     avg: 246733     median: 246733 (32%)     max: 247027 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
4294 Points (23%)
min: 4919     avg: 7101     median: 7789 (41%)     max: 7905 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 7541     avg: 8133     median: 7695 (50%)     max: 9164 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 9189     avg: 10361     median: 9824 (49%)     max: 12070 Points

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 810 → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 980 → 126% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.17
log 20. 09:46:53

#0 checking url part for id 12116 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10436 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 15 Oct 2021 13:09:32 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.047s ... 0.048s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12116 +0.005s ... 0.053s

#7 got single benchmarks 12116 +0.008s ... 0.062s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10436 +0.003s ... 0.065s

#9 got single benchmarks 10436 +0.017s ... 0.082s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.082s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.011s ... 0.093s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.093s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.094s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.095s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.096s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.096s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.096s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.097s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.097s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.018s ... 0.115s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.115s

#22 min, max, avg, median took s +0.002s ... 0.117s

#23 return log +0.004s ... 0.121s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)