Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron J1900 vs Intel Processor N200

Intel Celeron J1900

► remove from comparison Intel J1900

The Intel Celeron J1900 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for desktops and nettops. It is clocked at 2.0 - 2.42 GHz (Burst) and part of the Bay Trail-D platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and a clock speed of up to 2.42 GHz, the Celeron J1900 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the D2560. Presumably, the J1900 even outperforms the AMD Kabini APU A4-5000. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up 688 - 854 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 10 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact nettops.

Intel Processor N200

► remove from comparison Intel N200

The Intel Processor N200 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. Compared to older processors, the N200 should be similar to a Core i5-8250U (4 cores with HyperThreading, 3.4 GHz, 15W) when the power limit is not restricting performance.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N200 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelIntel Celeron J1900Intel Processor N200
CodenameBay Trail-DAlder Lake-N
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Alder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Celeron J1900 « 2 - 2.42 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J1850 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J1800 compare2.41 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J1750 compare2.41 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i3-N305 compare1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 « 1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock2000 - 2420 MHz1000 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache224 KB
L2 Cache2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP10 Watt6 Watt
Technology22 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1170
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 688 - 854 MHz), Dual-Channel DDR3(L)-1333 Memory Controller, CPU Burst
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (688 - 854 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$82 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L3 Cache6 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N200
20.7 pt (34%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
45 Points (25%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
91 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
1406 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
690 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 N200 +
265 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 N200 +
542 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N200 +
219 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N200 +
113 Points (31%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N200 +
2.7 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N200 +
1.4 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N200 +
3937 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N200 +
7549 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N200 +
11030 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N200 +
5971 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N200 +
875 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N200 +
26 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N200 +
2115 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N200 +
7146 MIPS (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N200 +
3230 MIPS (38%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N200 +
16.3 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N200 +
80 fps (18%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 N200 +
1.5 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N200 +
0.3 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N200 +
0.6 GB/s (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N200 +
3.2 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N200 +
4297 Seconds (55%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 N200 +
2150 Seconds (15%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 N200 +
1.1 sec (25%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N200 +
3902 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N200 +
18.8 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N200 +
42.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N200 +
1011 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N200 +
9491 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 N200 +
2765 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N200 +
27649 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N200 +
28655 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N200 +
34749 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 N200 +
2848 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 N200 +
4135 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 N200 +
1251 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
956 Points (24%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1660 Points (6%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
853 Points (27%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1375 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
928 Points (36%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1540 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
891 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1518 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
4552 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
9989 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N200 +
1460 ms (2%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 N200 +
171.3 Points (31%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 N200 +
614 Points (23%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
14.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
13.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
6.1 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 N200 +
16.1 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N200 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 17. 19:03:28

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4768 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14930 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752771808s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 17 Jul 2025 15:21:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 4768 +0s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 4768 +0s ... 0.006s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14930 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#10 got single benchmarks 14930 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.016s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.023s ... 0.039s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.042s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)