Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA ION 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI

NVIDIA ION 2

► remove from comparison NVIDIA ION 2

The Nvidia ION 2 (GT218-ION-A3 / GT218-ILV-A3) is a dedicated graphics card for the new Pinetrail Atom CPUs (e.g., N450, D510, D410 announced Dec 2009) Generation. The ION2 is based on the GT218 chip (GeForce 305M, 310M) with dedicated memory (compared to the old ION that was a chipset graphics card). Because of the limitations of the Pinetrail chipset, it can only be connected with PCIe 1x. Therefore, the performance of the chip is slower than a similar GeForce G210M e.g.

The ION 2 comes in three versions, that differ in core speed and shader cores.

10" Netbook ION

The ION chip in 10" netbooks with Pinetrail Atoms offers only 8 shader cores and a clock rate of 405 MHz. According to Nvidia the performance should still be similar to the first generation of ION. The power consumption of 6 Watt is rather low, and therefore fully suited for small netbooks.

12" Netbook ION

The 12" version features all 16 cores of the GT218 chip and is clocked at 475 MHz. The performance should be above the old ION platform.

Desktop & Netbook ION

The desktop version is clocked even higher at 535 MHz as no power restrictions have to be met.

 

First benchmarks by netbooknews.de on a pre-sample of the Acer Aspire 532g with the 8-shader-core version resulted in about 3000 points in 3DMark03. That would be noticeably slower than a ION 1 netbook. The relative low result can be explained by the early sample and the PCIe 1x bus. Still, compared to a GMA 3150 the performance is a lot better. 

As the integrated GMA 3150 graphics in the Atom CPU is quite limited (slow 3D performance, no HD video acceleration, no digital monitor output), the ION 2 is intended to adress these weak points. It offers a better 3D performance, (digital) monitor outputs (HDMI, DisplayPort, DVI, and VGA), video acceleration with PureVideo HD (since Flash 10.1 also for Internet Videos in HD) and CUDA for using the computing power of the GPU.

The netbook ION 2 versions also supports Optimus to automatically switch between the dedicated (ION) and integrated (GMA 3150) graphics card. Therefore the battery runtime without GPU load should be equal to a non ION netbook. The HDMI port however always triggers the use of the ION card, as the port cant be used with the GMA 3150.

The power consumption of 6-12 Watt TDP is quite high for an Atom system, but the ION 2 should be switchable (with the integrated GMA 3150) which still can lead to high battery runtimes.

NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI

► remove from comparison

Two NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX graphic cards in SLI combination grant highest performances coupled with highest current consumption. So, the performance is similar to the top DirectX 9 desktop graphic cards (without SLI in desktop).

The 7950 GTX is the top graphic card of the series 7000 from NVIDIA for laptops. It offered at the time of presentation a high performance to play all DirectX 9 games in high resolutions and details. Especially, regarding Antialiasing and Anisotrop filters the combined cards are clearly better than single cards. They are used for big and heavy laptops (because of the heat creation, at moment only in a 19" notebook). The card combination was succeeded by the 8800M GTX SLI card combination.

Due to the fact, that the SLI combination renders each frame on a different graphics card, the frametimes between two frames may differ. Therefore, the game at 30fps may stutter a bit, the so called micro stuttering.

NVIDIA ION 2NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI
CodenameGT218-ION-A3, GT218-ILV-A3G71M
ArchitectureGT2xxG7x
Pipelines16 - unified48 / 16 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed405 / 475 / 535 MHz575 MHz
Shader Speed? / 1100 / ? MHz
Memory Speed790 MHz700 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2, DDR3GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB2x512 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0
Power Consumption6/12 Watt90 Watt
technology40 nm90 nm
Date of Announcement10.01.2010 12.10.2006
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.comwww.nvidia.de
GeForce Go 7900 Series
GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI 48/16 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI compare 48/16 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
GeForce Go 7950 GTX compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI compare 40/14 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
GeForce Go 7900 GTX compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
GeForce Go 7900 GS compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Transistors556 Million
FeaturesHDR, Intellisample 4.0, UltraShadow II, PureVideo, CineFX 4.0, PowerMizer 6.0
Notebook Sizelarge
InformationTwo 7950 GTX graphic cards in SLI combination, 90nm, 278 Mio transistors, MXM-Module

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA ION 2
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
100%
1 ION 2 +
min: 696     avg: 715     median: 724 (0%)     max: 725 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA ION 2
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
100%
1 ION 2 +
min: 600     avg: 622     median: 601 (0%)     max: 664 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
100%
1 ION 2 +
min: 5470     avg: 5858     median: 5539.5 (6%)     max: 6882 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 3362     avg: 5342     median: 5718.5 (3%)     max: 6569 Points
34585 Points (18%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 2227     avg: 3385     median: 3817 (4%)     max: 3961 Points
10256 Points (11%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA ION 2
3DMark 06
2699 Points (4%)
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI
min: 4994     avg: 6737     median: 6737 (9%)     max: 8480 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA ION 2
3DMark 06
min: 1155     avg: 1822     median: 1963 (3%)     max: 2409 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI
7472 Points (10%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + NVIDIA ION 2
3DMark 06
100%
1 ION 2 +
2488 Points (3%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
100%
1 ION 2 +
min: 3.7     avg: 4.4     median: 4.3 (54%)     max: 5.6 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
100%
1 ION 2 +
min: 3.2     avg: 3.5     median: 3.3 (41%)     max: 4.7 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA ION 2
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
100%
1 ION 2 +
min: 326     avg: 972     median: 1027 (1%)     max: 1266 Points

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA ION 2 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI → 376% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
100%
ION 2:
25.3  fps
low 800x600
100%
ION 2:
12.4  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
ION 2:
13 31 ~ 22 fps
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
100%
ION 2:
23 42.7 57 ~ 41 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
ION 2:
16 26.5 29 ~ 24 fps
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
low 640x480
100%
ION 2:
25.2  fps
high 1024x768
100%
ION 2:
22.5  fps
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
100%
ION 2:
26 33.4 ~ 30 fps
high 1024x768
100%
ION 2:
9.8 15 ~ 12 fps
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
ION 2:
17  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
ION 2:
9.6  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
ION 2:
19  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
ION 2:
9.5  fps
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
low 800x600
100%
ION 2:
23  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
ION 2:
5  fps
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
100%
ION 2:
4.1  fps
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
100%
ION 2:
30.7  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI:
336  fps
med. 800x600
GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI:
206  fps
high 1024x768
GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI:
126  fps
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
100%
ION 2:
44 48.6 ~ 46 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
ION 2:
24.4 27 ~ 26 fps
high 1280x1024
100%
ION 2:
11.6  fps
Counter-Strike Source

Counter-Strike Source

2004
low 640x480
100%
ION 2:
25.8  fps
high 1024x768
100%
ION 2:
21.7  fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI:
141.8  fps
med. 640x480
GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI:
140.6  fps
high 800x600
GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI:
127.2  fps
ultra 1024x768
GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI:
110.7  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI:
482.9  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA ION 2 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

NVIDIA ION 2lowmed.highultraQHD4K
StarCraft 225.3
CoD Modern Warfare 212.36
Anno 140422
Sims 34124
Left 4 Dead25.1622.5
Trackmania Nations Forever3012
Crysis - GPU Benchmark179.6
Crysis - CPU Benchmark199.5
World in Conflict - Benchmark235
Call of Juarez Benchmark4.1
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark30.7
World of Warcraft462611.6
Counter-Strike Source25.821.7
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
8
3

5


5
1










NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLIlowmed.highultraQHD4K
F.E.A.R.336206126
Doom 3141.8140.6127.2110.7
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo482.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps



2



2



3


1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 07. 23:13:03

#0 checking url part for id 1609 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 71 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 May 2024 05:40:33 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.095s ... 0.096s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.096s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.096s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1609 +0.023s ... 0.118s

#8 got single benchmarks 1609 +0.014s ... 0.133s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 71 +0.001s ... 0.134s

#10 got single benchmarks 71 +0.009s ... 0.143s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.143s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.254s ... 0.397s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.397s

#14 Got 39 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.402s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.403s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.009s ... 0.411s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.036s ... 0.448s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.448s

#19 return log +0.038s ... 0.485s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)