Huawei Mate 20 RS Porsche Design
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 24 MPix f/2.0
Pricecompare
Average of 3 scores (from 14 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei Mate 20 RS Porsche Design
Source: Android Authority

The primary difference with this device is aesthetic. The Porsche Design Huawei Mate 20 Pro has two strips of genuine cow leather on the back, surrounding a center strip of black glass. This glass also embeds the cubed camera array, and there is no camera bump like there is on the standard Mate 20 Pro. Near the center of the glass, you’ll find a Porsche Design logo, with the Huawei logo directly underneath.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/22/2018
Foreign Reviews
Source: MobiFlip

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Chip.de

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/23/2019
Source: Android Mag

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/30/2018
Source: Android Pit

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Inside Handy

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/21/2018
Source: Android Pit

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/18/2018
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/29/2018
Rating: features: 99%
Source: AndroidPit.it

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.it

Positive: Powerful hardware; high performance; premium design; great built quality. Negative: High price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/18/2018
Source: AndroidPit.fr

Positive: Compact size; powerful hardware; high performance. Negative: High price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/19/2018
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Positive: Premium design; powerful hardware; high gaming performance; long battery life; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/21/2018
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Positive: Premium design; powerful hardware; high gaming performance; excellent display. Negative: Expensive.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/14/2018
Source: Sac Pin

Positive: Premium design; powerful hardware; high gaming performance; excellent display; long battery life; quick charging. Negative: Very expensive.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/13/2018
Comment
ARM Mali-G76 MP10: Integrated graphics card based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture. Uses 10 of the 20 possible clusters and according to ARM offers twice the performance per cluster than the old Mali-G72.
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Kirin 980: ARM based octa-core SoC with 2x Cortex-A76 up to 2.6 GHz (performance), 2x A76 with up to 1.92 (balance) and 4x Cortex-A53 with up to 1.8 GHz (power saving). Furthermore, it integrates a fast LTE modem with up to 1.4 GBit/s and is manufactured in 7nm at TSMC.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.39":
Only a few smartphones have larger screens.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.
0.187 kg:
Only few smartphones are more lightweight than this.
Huawei: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. is a Chinese company founded in 1987 with focus on telecommunications hardware and 170000 employees. In the first quarter of 2016, Huawei had a market share of 8.2% in the smartphone market, making it the third-largest smartphone manufacturer in the world. Compared to the same quarter of 2015, Huawei increased its market share by more than 58%.
In 2014, Huawei created the sub brand Honor and offers certain smartphone series under this name. The name Huawei is usually not listed for these products.
There are a lot of reviews on Huawei phones with slightly above average ratings (as of 2016).
80%: This rating is not convincing. The laptop is evaluated below average, this is not really a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.