Honor 200 Smart
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2
Price comparison
Average of 8 scores (from 12 reviews)
Reviews for the Honor 200 Smart
Source: Computerhoy
ES→ENSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/18/2024
Rating: Total score: 72%
Source: Smart World
IT→ENSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/17/2024
Rating: Total score: 69% price: 65% features: 65% display: 75% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Smart World
IT→ENSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/17/2024
Rating: Total score: 69% price: 65% features: 65% display: 75% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→ENSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/14/2024
Rating: Total score: 69% price: 80% display: 65% mobility: 85% workmanship: 70%
Source: Evo smart
IT→ENSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/14/2024
Rating: Total score: 57% price: 50% performance: 50% display: 50% mobility: 70%
Source: Tutto Android
IT→ENSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/14/2024
Source: HDblog.it
IT→ENSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/14/2024
Rating: Total score: 62% price: 88% features: 78%
Source: Igizmo
IT→ENPositive: Big screen; beautiful design; support 5G; headphone jack; stereo speakers; low price. Negative: LCD display; lack of NFC module; average gaming performance; no microSD card slot; poor selfie camera.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/20/2025
Source: Nerd-mobile
FR→ENSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/03/2024
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Co Nowego
PL→ENPositive: Modern design; affordable price. Negative: Average gaming performance; mediocre cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/16/2025
Source: Techno Senior
PL→ENPositive: Premium design; waterproof IP64; big screen; nice display; large battery capacity; microSD card slot; headphone jack; dual SIM. Negative: Mediocre cameras; average performance; lack of NFC module.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/08/2025
Source: Tek.no
NO→ENSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/01/2025
Rating: Total score: 75%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 613: Graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 SoC. Although it is the successor to the Adreno 619 in the SD 4 Gen 1, its performance is significantly lower in the entry-level class.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 4 Gen 2: Entry-level SoC with 8 Kryo cores (two ARM Cortex-A78 based cores with up to 2.2 GHz and 6 ARM Cortex-A55 with up to 2 GHz) and an X61 5G modem. Manufactured in 4nm at Samsung.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.80":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.Honor:
In 2014 Huawei created the sub brand Honor and offers certain smartphone series under this name. Occasionally the products are also called Huawei Honor.
The market share of Honor products is manageable, but there are several reviews on Honor smartphones with average ratings (as of 2016).
69.38%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.
