Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek MT8768 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435

Mediatek MT8768

► remove from comparison Mediatek Helio MT8768

The MediatekMT8768 is an entry level ARM SoC for smartphones (mainly Android based) and tablets that was introduced in early 2020. It is most likely manufactured in a 12 nm FinFET process (like the similar Helio A25) and is equipped with 8 ARM Cortex-A53 CPU cores divided in two clusters. A performance cluster with four cores clocked at up to 2 GHz and a efficiency cluster clocked at up to 1.5 GHz.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a LTE modem, a LPDDR3 / LPDDR4x-1600 memory controller, a IMG PowerVR GE8320 graphics card and a 1080p30 video de- and encoder (H.265 decoding, H.264 encoding).

Qualcomm Snapdragon 435

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 435

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (SD435) is a lower mainstream SoC for (Android based) smartphones and tablets. Contrary to the Snapdragon 630, it is still manufactured in a 28-nm process and also consists of an octa-core CPU part with ARM Cortex-A53 cores. However, they are only clocked at up to 1.4 GHz. The integrated X9 LTE modem supports Cat. 4 with maximum transfer rates of 300 Mbps (downstream) and 100 Mbps (upstream). The SoC also includes an Adreno 505 GPU with support for Vulkan and OpenGL ES 3.1. WiFi 802.11ac and Bluetooth 4.1 are supported as well. The memory controller supports LPDDR3 clocked at 800 MHz (so probably dual-channel DDRL-1600). The main difference to the Snapdragon 430 is the faster LTE modem.

ModelMediatek MT8768Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
SeriesMediatek Mediatek MT8Qualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Snapdragon Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8768 « 1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8168 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8766B compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM8936 compare1.7 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 « 1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1500 - 2000 MHz1400 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
FeaturesLTE Cat-7 DL / Cat-13 UL, LPDDR3 / LPDDR4x Memory Controller, 1080p30 H.264 Video Encoder, H.264 / H.265 1080p30 DecoderAdreno 505 GPU, 802.11ac WLAN, Bluetooth 4.1, LTE Cat. 7, Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1600 Memory Controller
iGPUPowerVR GE8320 ( - 650 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 505
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.qualcomm.com
Technology28 nm

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio MT8768
0.3 pt (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 435 +
7935 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 435 +
7745 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 11228     avg: 11876     median: 11431 (10%)     max: 12969 Points
79%
435 +
min: 7095     avg: 8887     median: 9015.5 (8%)     max: 9345 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 957     avg: 1390     median: 1251.5 (15%)     max: 2101 Points
93%
435 +
min: 1028     avg: 1199     median: 1167.5 (14%)     max: 1352 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 969     avg: 1146     median: 1144 (13%)     max: 1328 Points
101%
435 +
min: 1002     avg: 1182     median: 1152 (13%)     max: 1382 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
185 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
848 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 135     avg: 156     median: 155 (7%)     max: 179 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 498     avg: 775     median: 798.5 (1%)     max: 1003 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
789 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3745 Points (4%)
69%
435 +
min: 2210     avg: 2610     median: 2582 (3%)     max: 2889 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 435 +
577 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 435 +
2308 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 10163.3     avg: 11131     median: 11009 (13%)     max: 12342 ms
98%
435 +
min: 11007     avg: 12667     median: 12750 (15%)     max: 13586 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 435 +
1979 ms (22%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4070     avg: 4855     median: 4215 (4%)     max: 6281 Points
76%
435 +
min: 2689     avg: 3112     median: 3209 (3%)     max: 3314 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
30 Points (9%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 24     avg: 31.8     median: 32 (7%)     max: 39 Points
84%
435 +
27 Points (6%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 435 +
min: 42643     avg: 44884     median: 45572 (16%)     max: 46814 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
1 435 +
min: 4213     avg: 4532     median: 4581.5 (14%)     max: 4750 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
1 435 +
min: 14261     avg: 15880     median: 16055.5 (20%)     max: 17146 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
1 435 +
min: 9541     avg: 9568     median: 9563 (3%)     max: 9605 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
1 435 +
min: 27075     avg: 27665     median: 27740 (17%)     max: 28105 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 435 +
min: 56672     avg: 57644     median: 57289 (10%)     max: 59326 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 19097     avg: 21572     median: 21571.5 (18%)     max: 24046 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 15791     avg: 19538     median: 19538 (16%)     max: 23285 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 11434     avg: 11546     median: 11546 (2%)     max: 11658 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 35898     avg: 37935     median: 37935 (14%)     max: 39972 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 89714     avg: 90591     median: 90590.5 (9%)     max: 91467 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
132881 Points (8%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
40100 Points (11%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 435 +
81667 Points (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
6.9 MB/s (5%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
171.2 MB/s (5%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
18.7 MB/s (23%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
249 MB/s (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
6296 Points (10%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 4564     avg: 5215     median: 5215 (24%)     max: 5866 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
2269 Points (12%)
83%
435 +
min: 1646     avg: 1876     median: 1875.5 (10%)     max: 2105 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
5264 Points (11%)
131%
435 +
min: 4303     avg: 6883     median: 6882.5 (15%)     max: 9462 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 4536     avg: 4750     median: 4750 (31%)     max: 4964 Points
78%
435 +
min: 3538     avg: 3737     median: 3710 (24%)     max: 3928 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5647     avg: 6171     median: 6170.5 (31%)     max: 6694 Points
78%
435 +
min: 4316     avg: 4876     median: 4814.5 (24%)     max: 5438 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
232 Points (9%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
2.1 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
0.8 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8768 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 → 88% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 01. 20:38:17

#0 checking url part for id 12755 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8506 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.023s ... 0.024s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12755 +0.012s ... 0.036s

#7 got single benchmarks 12755 +0.014s ... 0.051s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8506 +0.003s ... 0.053s

#9 got single benchmarks 8506 +0.034s ... 0.087s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.087s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.129s ... 0.217s

#12 return log +0.022s ... 0.238s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)