Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Helio G70 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678

Mediatek Helio G70

► remove from comparison Mediatek Helio G70

The Mediatek Helio G70 is a mainstream ARM SoC for smartphones (mainly Android based) that was introduced in 2020. It is manufactured in a 12 nm FinFET process and integrates 8 CPU cores. Two fast ARM Cortex-A75 cores with up to 2 GHz for performance tasks and six small ARM Cortex-A55 with up to 1.7 GHz for efficiency. All eight cores can be used together thanks to Heterogeneous Multi-Processing support. The integrated GPU is a ARM Mali-G52 MC2 (MP2) with two clusters at up to 820 MHz. The SoC also integrates the HyperEngine that handles a dynamic management of CPU, GPU and memory.

Compared to the slightly faster Helio G80, the difference to the G70 is the slightly lower clock speed for the A55 cores (-100 MHz) and GPU (-130 MHz).

The SoC integrates furthermore a LTE radio with Cat-7 (download) / Cat-13 (upload) support, Wifi 5 (ac), Bluetooth 5.0, LPDDR4x 1800 MHz and eMMC 5.1 storage.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 678

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 678

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 (SD678) is a mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 460 called cores (64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of two cores with up to 2.2 GHz and  based on the ARM Cortex-A76 design. And a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.7 GHz and based on much smaller ARM Cortex-A55 cores. Both clusters can also used together. Compared to the old Snapdragon 675, the clock speed of the cores was increased by 200 MHz for the A76 and 100 MHz for the A55 cores.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a lower mid range Adreno 612 GPU, a X12 LTE Modem with up to 600 Mbps download (Cat 12) and 150 Mbps upload (Cat 13), a 802.11ac (Wifi 5) Wave 2 WLAN modem (up to 867 Mbps), a Bluetooth 5.0 radio, satellite positioning (GPS, QZSS, GLONASS, SBAS, Beidou and Galileo) and a video engine (up to 4k30 encoding and support for H.265, H.264, VP8 and VP9).

Performance

Compared to the old Snapdragon 675, the 678 is only slightly faster in our benchmarks. Thanks to the two fast Cortex-A76 based cores, the SD678 is able to even best the old high end Snapdragon 835 SoC in some benchmarks.

The Snapdragon 678 is produced in the same 11nm LPP (Low Power Plus) process at Samsung as the 675 which is a combination of 14nm and 10nm. Compared to 14nm LPP, the 11nm LPP process should be able to increase performance by 15% and decrease the chip size by 10% according to Samsung.

ModelMediatek Helio G70Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
SeriesMediatek MediatekQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Kryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76) / Silver (Cortex-A55)
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76) / Silver (Cortex-A55)
Mediatek Helio P90 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio P65 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio G88 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio G85 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio G80 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio G70 « 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 « 1.7 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76) / Silver (Cortex-A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 compare1.6 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76) / Silver (Cortex-A55)
Clock2000 MHz1700 - 2200 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology12 nm11 nm
Features4x ARM Cortex-A73, 4x ARM Cortex-A53,Adreno 612 GPU, X12 LTE Modem, Hexagon 685 DSP, Spectra 250L ISP
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP2 ( - 820 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 612
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio G70
0.5 pt (36%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 678
0.6 pt (42%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 SD 678 +
19549 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
2858 Points (34%)
3156 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
2875 Points (33%)
2769 Points (32%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 387     avg: 387.5     median: 387.5 (16%)     max: 388 Points
531 Points (22%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1304     avg: 1308     median: 1307.5 (2%)     max: 1311 Points
1541 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1832 Points (18%)
2483 Points (25%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5734 Points (6%)
6570 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 678 +
2570 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 678 +
6381 Points (16%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5285 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1767 Points (26%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 678 +
5674 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 678 +
2219 Points (43%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3091 Points (25%)
2183 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
4201 Points (38%)
2812 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
10960 Points (21%)
12166 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
4973 Points (10%)
5669 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6725 Points (18%)
7022 Points (18%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
3813 ms (4%)
2750 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
10648 Points (10%)
15828 Points (14%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
44 Points (9%)
71 Points (15%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 38542     avg: 39056     median: 39056 (33%)     max: 39570 Points
51338 Points (43%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
41555 Points (34%)
49402 Points (40%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
29199 Points (5%)
31202 Points (6%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
74788 Points (27%)
94453 Points (34%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
184084 Points (18%)
226395 Points (22%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 SD 678 +
275441 Points (17%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 SD 678 +
101216 Points (28%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
13756 Points (2%)
2743 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
5781 Points (31%)
3846 Points (20%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
8027 Points (17%)
10456 Points (22%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
8838 Points (58%)
7011 Points (46%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
12464 Points (62%)
8220 Points (41%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 SD 678 +
11488 Points (18%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 SD 678 +
7645 Points (35%)

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio G70 → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 → 107% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 16. 18:38:01

#0 checking url part for id 12223 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13220 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.023s ... 0.024s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12223 +0.016s ... 0.04s

#7 got single benchmarks 12223 +0.012s ... 0.052s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13220 +0.015s ... 0.067s

#9 got single benchmarks 13220 +0.008s ... 0.075s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.075s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.185s ... 0.259s

#12 return log +0.056s ... 0.315s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)