Notebookcheck Logo

Gabe Newell defended Steam in Valve antitrust lawsuit, arguing gamers have choices

Banner for Valve antitrust lawsuit is shown
ⓘ Valve, Canva AI
Banner for Valve antitrust lawsuit is shown
Many PC gamers won’t consider purchasing games anywhere but Steam. Plaintiffs in antitrust lawsuits accuse the company of acting illegally to preserve a monopoly. Gabe Newell rejected those allegations, amid rumors that Valve controls pricing outside its marketplace.

Valve co-founder Gabe Newell takes a hands-off approach to operations at Steam. However, in 2023, a court forced him to testify in an ongoing antitrust lawsuit. Wolfire Games began the proceedings in 2021, accusing the gaming giant of holding a monopoly. Newell denied that the company has an unfair advantage, but questions linger about anti-competitive policies.

Bloomberg published an extensive report highlighting the litigation Valve faces in the US and UK. In transcripts from the Wolfire Games case, Newell argued, “Customers have enormous choice.” He then explained that buyers can decide:

Where they purchase their products, whether they buy the game on an Xbox, whether they buy it on Steam, whether they buy it on Epic Games Store, or whether they buy it directly from software developers.

Critics, including Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney, believe the 30% fee the marketplace charges publishers is excessive. Another focus of the Valve antitrust lawsuit is whether it influences pricing on other storefronts. When asked about the matter, Newell replied:

Valve does not have a policy or practice of dictating prices to third-party software developers on other platforms.

The unorthodox executive didn’t provide clarification when pressed. Regardless, various developers have described threats of delisting Steam games. Smaller studios reportedly were dissuaded from offering the same titles for cheaper elsewhere. Bloomberg also documented how Valve discouraged the more powerful Ubisoft from selling exclusive DLC off-site.

Publishers and consumers view Steam differently

A survey conducted by Rokky found that 72% of industry representatives agreed that Valve has a monopoly. It dominates the Epic Games Store and other competitors, having earned more than an estimated $16 billion in revenue in 2025 alone. Many gamers remain loyal to Steam for its immense selection, regular discounts, and useful community features.

Courts may decide that Newell’s company acted illegally to maintain its position. Allegations that it prevents publishers from listing Steam games for less on other stores are a critical issue. If Valve loses a separate UK antitrust lawsuit, it risks paying out up to $900 million to affected buyers.

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

No comments for this article

Got questions or something to add to our article? Even without registering you can post in the comments!
No comments for this article / reply

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > News > News Archive > Newsarchive 2026 06 > Gabe Newell defended Steam in Valve antitrust lawsuit, arguing gamers have choices
Adam Corsetti, 2026-06- 2 (Update: 2026-06- 2)