Notebookcheck Logo

Fujitsu Stylistic V535 (Z3795,128 GB, LTE) Tablet Review

Ruggedized for Tough Work. With these words, Fujitsu advertises the industry tablet Stylistic V535. The 8.3-inch tablet comes with many communication features, large memory capacity, and a 64-bit CPU. The specification appears excellent. However, the reality is different: Passive cooling thwarts any plans.

For the original German review, see here.

The 8.3-inch Fujitsu Stylistic V535 tablet is designed for all kinds of industrial use. The business device for about 1300 Euros (~$1527) features an Intel Atom processor, 4 GB of RAM, and 128 GB of eMMC storage. Optionally, the tablet can be adapted to the work environment with many accessories.

The competition: Panasonic offers the Toughpad series as Windows and as Android variant. The Android version uses an Intel Celeron N2930 with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 2 GB of RAM and 32 GB of eMMC storage and it costs about 1700 Euros (~$1997). The Windows alternative for 1500 Euros (~$1762) comes with an Intel Core i5-4302Y, 4 GB of RAM and 128 GB SSD. The HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 and the Dell Venue 8 Pro are designed for less rough workplaces.

Fujitsu Stylistic V535 (Stylistic Series)
Processor
Intel Atom Z3795 4 x 1.6 - 2.4 GHz, Bay Trail-T
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 778 MHz
Memory
4 GB 
, dual channel
Display
8.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 265 PPI, capacitive multi-touch, LG Philips LGD0000, IPS, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Bay Trail Host Bridge
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: audio combo, Card Reader: MicroSD, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, compass
Networking
Broadcom 802.11 abgn Wireless SDIO Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4, 4G/LTE module, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 12.5 x 227.8 x 150.1 ( = 0.49 x 8.97 x 5.91 in)
Battery
17.7 Wh, 4425 mAh Lithium-Polymer, removeable, 2 cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 2 MP front camera
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix auto focus, flash
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, 24 Months Warranty, fanless, ruggedized
Weight
550 g ( = 19.4 oz / 1.21 pounds), Power Supply: 90 g ( = 3.17 oz / 0.2 pounds)
Price
1300 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case & Connectivity

The plain plastic case does not convey an industry product at first. However, the wide display frames and plastic covers on the interfaces suggest a robust business device. Overall, the build quality is satisfactory. Only the battery cover did not fit 100% accurately. Speaking of the battery: As already mentioned the battery sits beneath a cover on the rear side, which can be easily removed with a pry. The manufacturer has applied protection for potentially rougher industrial use. The tablet meets the MIL-STD 810G standard and is supposed to survive drops from up to 1.8 m (only with the optional rugged frame). In addition, the case complies with the IP65 standard, i.e. protection against dust penetration and splash water.

Optional accessories are listed on the product page.

Product namePrice (incl. VAT MwSt)
Hand strap for STYLISTIC V53553.40 Euro
Shoulder strap for STYLISTIC V53557.00 Euro
Rugged Frame for STYLISTIC V535355.70 Euro
Smart Shell with SmartCard for STYLISTIC V535ns
Mounting Kit for STYLISTIC V535150.00 Euro
Universal Docking Cradle for STYLISTIC V535413.80 Euro

Fujitsu equips its industry tablet with a 4G/LTE module (optional), NFC, GPS, WLAN, and Bluetooth. The performance of the Wi-Fi module is alarmingly low. We only measured about 40 Mbit/s.

Size Comparison

227.8 mm / 8.97 inch 150.1 mm / 5.91 inch 12.5 mm / 0.4921 inch 550 g1.213 lbs203 mm / 7.99 inch 132 mm / 5.2 inch 27 mm / 1.063 inch 590 g1.301 lbs216 mm / 8.5 inch 130 mm / 5.12 inch 10 mm / 0.3937 inch 377 g0.831 lbs215 mm / 8.46 inch 140 mm / 5.51 inch 9 mm / 0.3543 inch 375 g0.827 lbs210 mm / 8.27 inch 148 mm / 5.83 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 2.9 g0.00639 lbs

Connectivity

Without the docking solution for about 400 Euros mentioned above, the connectivity is poor. There is only one USB 2.0 port.

Top
Top
Bottom: docking port
Bottom: docking port
Left
Left
Right: SIM slot, power-in, USB 2.0, headphones
Right: SIM slot, power-in, USB 2.0, headphones
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
618 MBit/s +1407%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
440 MBit/s +973%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Broadcom 802.11 abgn Wireless SDIO Adapter
41 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
586 MBit/s +1263%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
577 MBit/s +1242%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Broadcom 802.11 abgn Wireless SDIO Adapter
43 MBit/s

Input Devices

Since the manufacturer does not offer a pen, all inputs have to be done with the fingers via the touchscreen. The touch unit works satisfactorily and recognizes input in the corners and multi-touch gestures with ease. As already criticized in other reviews, the Windows system is hardly optimized for small touch displays. Those who do not want to deal with delicate inputs time and again and do not need a Windows system would be better off buying an Android device such as the Panasonic Toughpad.

Display

Pixel grid
Pixel grid

The used 8.3-inch display features a resolution of 1920x1200 pixels. Fujitsu decided to use a glossy IPS display in its industry tablet. The manufacturer specifies a brightness of 400 cd/m². Unfortunately, this brightness level is not reached in our test. We measured an average of 343 cd/m². Disappointing: The brightness falls to only 284 cd/m² on battery. This is too low; especially for an industry device which should also be suitable for use in bright outdoor environments. For example, the Panasonic Toughpad comes with a matte panel with an average brightness of 500 cd/m².

292
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
313
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
344
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
302
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LG Philips LGD0000 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 344 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 309.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 284 cd/m²
Contrast: 717:1 (Black: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.98 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.26 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
72% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
47% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
51.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
49.67% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
LG Philips LGD0000, , 1920x1080, 8.30
Panasonic Toughpad FZ-B2
1280x800, 7.00
HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA
OspresCR PO, , 1280x800, 8.00
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
MS 9001, , 1920x1200, 8.00
Panasonic ToughPad FZ-M1
LFP14, , 1280x800, 7.00
Display
12%
3%
-13%
Display P3 Coverage
49.67
56.6
14%
50.9
2%
42.73
-14%
sRGB Coverage
72.6
80
10%
75.3
4%
64.2
-12%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
51.4
58
13%
52.7
3%
44.17
-14%
Response Times
-32%
4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
29 ?(13, 16)
26 ?(9, 17)
10%
28 ?(10, 18)
3%
Response Time Black / White *
19 ?(10, 9)
33 ?(13, 20)
-74%
18 ?(5, 13)
5%
PWM Frequency
378 ?(40)
Screen
-72%
9%
-28%
-16%
Brightness middle
344
540
57%
347
1%
279
-19%
561
63%
Brightness
310
498
61%
333
7%
255
-18%
528
70%
Brightness Distribution
83
85
2%
91
10%
85
2%
86
4%
Black Level *
0.48
0.32
33%
0.11
77%
0.2
58%
0.77
-60%
Contrast
717
1688
135%
3155
340%
1395
95%
729
2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.98
23.34
-683%
5.45
-83%
7.64
-156%
5.55
-86%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.11
9.42
-54%
15.3
-150%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.26
6.82
-109%
10.63
-226%
6.22
-91%
7.04
-116%
Gamma
2.42 91%
2.21 100%
1.34 164%
2.17 101%
2.46 89%
CCT
6106 106%
6334 103%
6404 101%
6798 96%
6323 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
47
52
11%
49
4%
41
-13%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
72
80
11%
71
-1%
64
-11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-72% / -72%
-4% / 4%
-7% / -17%
-15% / -16%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use

The CalMAN analysis reports a deltaE shift of about three. This result is normal for a high-end IPS panel. However, the color coverage, which is interesting for graphics professionals, is too low. The smaller sRGB color space is covered to 72%. The coverage of the big AdobeRGB space is only 47%.

As observed previously, the display brightness falls to about 284 cd/m² on battery. This is sufficient for using the tablet in the shade. However, it is not possible to use it in indirect or direct sun.

CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Saturation Sweeps
CalMAN Saturation Sweeps
AdobeRGB color coverage
AdobeRGB color coverage
sRGB color coverage
sRGB color coverage

Performance

The Fujitsu Stylistic V535 Industrial is an 8.3-inch tablet for the business range. An Intel Bay Trail CPU with four cores and a base clock of 1.6 GHz works inside. In addition, it features 4 GB of RAM and a 128 GB storage device. The manufacturer charges about 1300 Euros (~$1527) for the bundle.

Processor

The core is an Intel Atom Z3795 from Intel's Bay Trail generation. The quad-core processor features a clock rate of 1590 to 2390 MHz. Because of its low TDP of less than 4 W, the CPU is especially suitable for mobile tablets. A special feature is 64-bit support. Hence, it can run all desktop programs.

In the Cinebench R15 multi-core test the result fluctuates heavily between 100 and 118 points. After several runs, the score falls to under 90. Thus, the performance heavily correlates with the temperature of the device.

See our special article for more comparisons and benchmarks.

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel Core m7-6Y75
119 Points +213%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
88 Points +132%
Panasonic ToughPad FZ-M1
Intel Core i5-4302Y
65 Points +71%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Intel Atom Z3795
38 Points
Dell Venue 11 Pro 5130-9356
Intel Atom Z3795
37 Points -3%
HP ElitePad 1000 G2
Intel Atom Z3795
36 Points -5%
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
Intel Atom x5-Z8500
35 Points -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
Intel Core m7-6Y75
234 Points +98%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
Intel Core m3-6Y30
206 Points +75%
Panasonic ToughPad FZ-M1
Intel Core i5-4302Y
185 Points +57%
HP ElitePad 1000 G2
Intel Atom Z3795
134 Points +14%
Dell Venue 11 Pro 5130-9356
Intel Atom Z3795
131 Points +11%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Intel Atom Z3795
118 Points
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
Intel Atom x5-Z8500
73 Points -38%

System Performance

We were not always satisfied with the system performance of the small 8-inch device. Even after clicking the Windows start menu, there is a long delay. After uninstalling the preinstalled McAfee LiveSafe software, we could finally work with the test model. The PCMark 8 Home benchmark reports 1139 points, which is normal for the hardware. The HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 is about on par.

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
2976 Points +161%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2426 Points +113%
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, Hynix HCG8E 64 GB
1426 Points +25%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3795, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1139 Points
HP Pro Tablet 10 EE G1
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1106 Points -3%
HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3736F, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1104 Points -3%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1139 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
1227 points
Help

Storage Device

As is usual for the tablet range, eMMC storage is used. The storage device features lower transfer rates than the SSD variant. Our test model comes with a storage capacity of 128 GB. Fujitsu also offers a 64 GB variant for those who do not need that high a capacity.

Fujitsu Stylistic V535
128 GB eMMC Flash
HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA
64 GB eMMC Flash
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
Hynix HCG8E 64 GB
Panasonic ToughPad FZ-M1
Samsung MZNTE128HMGR-000SO
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-3%
-18%
442%
Read Seq
164.3
114.8
-30%
125.9
-23%
503
206%
Write Seq
61.1
55.3
-9%
58.4
-4%
138
126%
Read 512
156.3
118
-25%
101.9
-35%
422.7
170%
Write 512
42.27
63.5
50%
43.9
4%
137.8
226%
Read 4k
15.75
17.4
10%
13.6
-14%
34.19
117%
Write 4k
12.04
8.719
-28%
8.2
-32%
92.6
669%
Read 4k QD32
29.17
38.77
33%
26.2
-10%
364.4
1149%
Write 4k QD32
13.97
10.39
-26%
10
-28%
135.8
872%
128 GB eMMC Flash
Sequential Read: 164.3 MB/s
Sequential Write: 61.1 MB/s
512K Read: 156.3 MB/s
512K Write: 42.27 MB/s
4K Read: 15.75 MB/s
4K Write: 12.04 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 29.17 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 13.97 MB/s

Graphics Card

An Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is responsible for graphics output. The GPU features a core clock of 311 and 896 MHz and belongs to the low-end performance range. It performs averagely with a score of 191 in 3DMark 11. The Intel HD Graphics achieves between 122 to 237 points in 3DMark 11.

See our benchmark list of current notebook graphics cards for more benchmarks and comparisons with mobile graphics units.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8500
305 Points +60%
HP ElitePad 1000 G2
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Atom Z3795
197 Points +3%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Atom Z3795
191 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad 10
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Atom Z3795
181 Points -5%
HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Atom Z3736F
175 Points -8%
Dell Venue 11 Pro 5130-9356
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Atom Z3795
173 Points -9%
3DMark 11 Performance
218 points
Help

Gaming Performance

The gaming capabilities are very low. If you still want to play games on the small 8-inch device, you should stick to old games.

low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 8.4 3.5

Emissions and Energy

System Noise

Fujitsu decided to use passive cooling and a silent storage device. As a result, the test model does not emit noise at all.

Temperature

The temperature already increases to 33 °C in idle mode at an environment temperature of 23 °C. The reason is found quickly: The CPU load even exceeds 40% in idle mode, but we did not find out why exactly this happens. Under load, we measure high temperatures of about 45 °C. We had hoped for a better cooling strategy, especially since significantly higher environment temperatures are likely in industry use.

As soon as we run our stress test with Prime95 and FurMark, the CPU throttles to 600 MHz. After this test, the business tablet needs a while until full performance is available again. The 3DMark 11 results are about 10% lower after the stress test.

Max. Load
 32.2 °C
90 F
34 °C
93 F
40.8 °C
105 F
 
 34.2 °C
94 F
32.6 °C
91 F
42.5 °C
109 F
 
 33.3 °C
92 F
33.9 °C
93 F
40.9 °C
106 F
 
Maximum: 42.5 °C = 109 F
Average: 36 °C = 97 F
42.9 °C
109 F
33.9 °C
93 F
32.3 °C
90 F
44.9 °C
113 F
34.1 °C
93 F
33 °C
91 F
42.5 °C
109 F
34 °C
93 F
31.3 °C
88 F
Maximum: 44.9 °C = 113 F
Average: 36.5 °C = 98 F
Power Supply (max.)  47.9 °C = 118 F | Room Temperature 23.1 °C = 74 F | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Front: load
Front: load
Rear: load
Rear: load
Front: idle
Front: idle
Rear: idle
Rear: idle

Speakers

The incorporated speakers should only be used for system sound. They simply sound too unbalanced for everything beyond that. Music sounds too high-tone heavy.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.435.340.42533.934.633.93134.732.234.74034.532.334.55036.43136.46337.429.837.48037.427.237.410038.527.338.512540.325.240.316040.82440.820042.123.942.125045.422.845.431548.922.148.940052.220.852.25005520.35563057.819.557.880061.41961.4100063.217.763.2125066.617.466.6160068.816.868.8200069.316.869.3250069.816.669.8315068.416.668.4400066.816.666.8500065.616.665.6630061.316.761.3800055.716.755.71000064.816.964.81250067.716.967.71600061.516.861.5SPL78.529.978.5N39.71.339.7median 61.4median 17.4median 61.4Delta9.12.39.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseFujitsu Stylistic V535Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Fujitsu Stylistic V535 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Frequency comparison (checkboxes select/deselectable!)

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the used components is on a normal low level at under 7.5 W. Under load there are two scenarios: Under average load, we measured a power consumption of 11.8 W. It falls to 8.9 W under maximum load due to CPU-throttling.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 1.7 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.9 / 7.4 / 7.5 Watt
Load midlight 11.8 / 8.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Battery Life

The used two-cell lithium-polymer battery features a capacity of 16.48 Wh. The manufacturer specifies a maximum battery life of 6 h.

The Wi-Fi test gives a realistic battery life. We simulate web-surfing at a brightness of about 150 cd/m². The Fujitsu Stylistic V535 shuts down after just above 4 hours. The HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 performs better. At over 8 hours, it lasts a workday.

Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Z3795, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 17.7 Wh
Panasonic Toughpad FZ-B2
N2930, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 24 Wh
HP Pro Tablet 408 G1 L3S97AA
Z3736F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 18 Wh
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
Z8500, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 18.3 Wh
Panasonic ToughPad FZ-M1
4302Y, HD Graphics 4200, 22 Wh
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
252
300
19%
491
95%
320
27%
246
-2%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
4h 12min

Pros

+ solid build quality
+ Full HD display
+ many optional accessories
+ 64-bit Windows system

Cons

- heat development while idle
- high CPU utilization while idle
- no matte display
- weak Wi-Fi performance
- short battery life

Verdict

In review: Fujitsu V535. Test model provided by Fujitsu Germany.
In review: Fujitsu V535. Test model provided by Fujitsu Germany.

A tablet for high industrial requirements. The Fujitsu Tablet Stylistic V535 targets those who need a reliable tablet for rough environments. In order to achieve this goal, the 8.3-inch tablet complies with several standards such as the MIL STD 810 test. Moreover, the manufacturer offers accessories for various usage scenarios, for example a docking solution, a rugged frame, and straps. While the test model offers several communication options, Wi-Fi communication is extremely slow. Unfortunately, the display also falls behind our expectations. It cannot reach the specified brightness of 400 cd/m² by far. Since an industry device will also be used outdoors, the low brightness might be a reason not to buy this tablet.

We are also not satisfied with the performance: It appears that the test model is often overextended. Long delays and stuttering are not infrequent. The fully fledged Windows system appears to be too much for the Stylistic. This is also reflected by the temperature development. A temperature increase can even be observed in idle mode at an environment temperature of 23 °C. The easily replaceable battery and the battery life of above four hours are advantages.

The Stylistic V535 is well suitable for those who are looking for an industry tablet with many communication features and Windows operating system.

Nevertheless, it is worth considering the competition: The Panasonic Toughpad features a brighter and matte display and Android as operating system.

Fujitsu Stylistic V535 - 07/24/2017 v6(old)
Nino Ricchizzi

Chassis
86%
Connectivity
39 / 65 → 59%
Weight
82 / 40-88 → 88%
Games Performance
11 / 68 → 15%
Application Performance
30 / 76 → 40%
Temperature
70%
Noise
100%
Audio
30 / 91 → 33%
Camera
76 / 85 → 90%
Average
62%
73%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 1 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Fujitsu Stylistic V535 (Z3795,128 GB, LTE) Tablet Review
Nino Ricchizzi, 2017-07-27 (Update: 2020-05-19)