, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Samsung Exynos 9820

Samsung Exynos 9825

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9825

The Samsung Exynos 9 9825 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced in the Samsung Note 10 line in August 2019. The processor integrates three clusters of processor cores with different architectures. Two big Samsung custom M4 cores clock up to 2.73 GHz and deliver peak performance. Two additional ARM Cortex-A75 are also for performance tasks and clock at up to 2.4 GHz (up from 2.3 GHz in the 9820). Finally, four small and power efficient ARM-Cortex A55 cores clock at up to 1.9 GHz are in the third cluster. The different clusters can run simultaneously thanks to DinamIQ.

The integrated LTE modem supports LTE-Advanced Pro Cat.20 (8CA 2 Gbps download, 3CA 316 Mbps upload). The integrated graphics card is a ARM Mali G76MP12 with 12 cores. Thanks to higher clock rates, the G76 is now a bit faster compared to the Exynos 9820.

The performance of the CPU part is positioned in the high end segment for smartphone processors. Due to the slight changes in clock rates, it is very comparable to the older Eynos 9 9820. Maybe in longer load phases, the improved 7nm process helps to maintain clock speeds a bit better. The direct competitor Snapdragon 855 can be left behind in single-core benchmarks like Geekbench and operates on par in multi-core benchmarks.

The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 7nm LPP (with EUV) process that should improve power efficiency compared to the Exynos 9820.

Samsung Exynos 9820

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9820

The Samsung Exynos 9 9820 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced late 2018 and was first integrated in the Samsung Galaxy S10 smartphones early 2019. The SoC integrates three clusters of processor cores with different architectures. Two big Samsung custom M4 cores clock up to 2.7 GHz and deliver peak performance. Two additional ARM Cortex-A75 are also for performance tasks and clock at up to 2.3 GHz. Finally, four small and power efficient ARM-Cortex A55 cores clock at up to 1.9 GHz are in the third cluster. The different clusters can run simultaneously thanks to DinamIQ.

The integrated LTE modem supports LTE-Advanced Pro Cat.20 (8CA 2 Gbps download, 3CA 316 Mbps upload). The integrated graphics card is a ARM Mali G76MP12 with 12 cores.

The performance of the CPU part is positioned in the high end segment for smartphone processors. The single core performance is, thanks to the big custom cores, a strong suit of the CPU and reaches the levels of Apples mobile SoCs. The direct competitor Snapdragon 855 can be left behind in single-core benchmarks like Geekbench and operates on par in multi-core benchmarks. The predecessor Exynos 9810 can be bested by around 17% in our first benchmarks with the Galaxy S10 Plus.

The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 8nm LPP process that should also help with some of the performance gains.

Samsung Exynos 9825Samsung Exynos 9820
Samsung ExynosSamsung Exynos
Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Series: Exynos Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
» Samsung Exynos 98251.9 - 2.73 GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 98201.9 - 2.7 GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 9810 compare0 - 2.9 GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 98251.9 - 2.73 GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
» Samsung Exynos 98201.9 - 2.7 GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 9810 compare0 - 2.9 GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
1900 - 2730 MHz1900 - 2700 MHz
8 / 88 / 8
7 8
ARM Mali-G76MP12 GPU , 2x Samsung Mongoose Custom CPU, 2x Cortex-A75, 4x Cortex-A55 big.LITTLE, LPDDR4x Memory ControllerARM Mali-G76MP12 GPU , 2x Samsung Mongoose Custom CPU, 2x Cortex-A75, 4x Cortex-A55 big.LITTLE, LPDDR4x Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-G76 MP12ARM Mali-G76 MP12
ArchitectureARMARM
Samsung Exynos Exynos 9825Samsung Exynos Exynos 9820

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 9820
40.4 pt (65%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 31908     avg: 32588     median: 32588 (34%)     max: 33268 Points
min: 31297     avg: 32016     median: 32228.5 (33%)     max: 32308 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 3389     avg: 3519     median: 3519 (44%)     max: 3649 Points
min: 2925     avg: 3123     median: 3043.5 (38%)     max: 3480 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 3498     avg: 3622     median: 3622 (53%)     max: 3746 Points
min: 3077     avg: 3226     median: 3087 (45%)     max: 3513 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3566 Points (29%)
min: 1870     avg: 1985     median: 1984.5 (16%)     max: 2099 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5534 Points (50%)
min: 2997     avg: 3050     median: 3049.5 (28%)     max: 3102 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
13991 Points (27%)
min: 14240     avg: 14552     median: 14552 (29%)     max: 14864 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
7083 Points (14%)
min: 7271     avg: 7404     median: 7403.5 (15%)     max: 7536 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
8839 Points (23%)
min: 8338     avg: 8493     median: 8492.5 (22%)     max: 8647 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
7453 (12%)
min: 7690     avg: 7824     median: 7823.5 (12%)     max: 7957
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2169 (44%)
min: 2382     avg: 2388     median: 2387.5 (49%)     max: 2393
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5109 (79%)
min: 4881     avg: 4958     median: 4957.5 (77%)     max: 5034
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10487 (26%)
min: 10000     avg: 10109     median: 10109 (25%)     max: 10218
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4549     avg: 4550     median: 4550 (57%)     max: 4551
min: 4499     avg: 4510     median: 4505.5 (56%)     max: 4529
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10367     avg: 10426     median: 10425.5 (13%)     max: 10484
min: 10162     avg: 10366     median: 10374 (13%)     max: 10553
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 805     avg: 814     median: 813.5 (44%)     max: 822
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2177     avg: 2184     median: 2184 (7%)     max: 2191
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
834 (44%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2331 (14%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2478.2     avg: 2503     median: 2503 (4%)     max: 2527.8 ms
min: 1823.2     avg: 1961     median: 1890.4 (3%)     max: 2239.5 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 18908     avg: 19022     median: 19021.5 (27%)     max: 19135 Points
min: 18697     avg: 20121     median: 20469.5 (30%)     max: 20849 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 97     avg: 108     median: 107.5 (34%)     max: 118 Points
115 Points (37%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
99150 Points (100%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 291772     avg: 292608     median: 292608 (100%)     max: 293444 Points
min: 269219     avg: 275038     median: 273831 (93%)     max: 283270 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 18280     avg: 18321     median: 18320.5 (56%)     max: 18361 Points
min: 12202     avg: 12486     median: 12323.5 (38%)     max: 13096 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 70640     avg: 70670     median: 70669.5 (87%)     max: 70699 Points
min: 67209     avg: 68326     median: 68203 (84%)     max: 69689 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 155432     avg: 155907     median: 155906 (48%)     max: 156381 Points
min: 148074     avg: 148912     median: 149162 (46%)     max: 149249 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 101869     avg: 102259     median: 102259 (63%)     max: 102649 Points
min: 97864     avg: 99848     median: 99722 (61%)     max: 102082 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 347082     avg: 347156     median: 347156 (61%)     max: 347229 Points
min: 327454     avg: 329572     median: 328778 (58%)     max: 333277 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
64371 Points (54%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
71200 Points (57%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
166540 Points (31%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
128208 Points (46%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
430319 Points (41%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
215665 Points (28%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
5864 Points (31%)
min: 5013     avg: 5063     median: 5075 (27%)     max: 5101 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
22707 Points (61%)
min: 8407     avg: 8786     median: 8830 (24%)     max: 9121 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 8801     avg: 8914     median: 8914 (58%)     max: 9027 Points
min: 7595     avg: 7769     median: 7758 (51%)     max: 7966 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 11011     avg: 11412     median: 11412 (57%)     max: 11813 Points
min: 9557     avg: 9777     median: 9771.5 (49%)     max: 10008 Points

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9825 → 100% n=31

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9820 → 92% n=31

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 17. 15:35:25

#0 checking url part for id 11485 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11322 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:09:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11485 +0s ... 0.009s

#7 got single benchmarks 11485 +0.008s ... 0.017s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11322 +0.004s ... 0.021s

#9 got single benchmarks 11322 +0.009s ... 0.03s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.03s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.023s ... 0.053s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.057s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)