Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Dell XPS 13 9305 goes global: Cheaper and lighter than the XPS 13 9310 but at a considerable screen-to-body ratio cost

The Dell XPS 13 9305 has a much wider bottom bezel than the 9310 counterpart. (Image source: Dell - edited)
The Dell XPS 13 9305 has a much wider bottom bezel than the 9310 counterpart. (Image source: Dell - edited)
The Dell XPS 13 9305 laptop is now available to purchase from country sites such as the US and UK after previously being listed for sale in China. The XPS 13 9305 is a cheaper variant of the XPS 13 9310 that is also slightly lighter and comes with a 16:9 aspect ratio and lower screen-to-body ratio. The budget Dell XPS 13 utilizes Intel Tiger Lake processors.

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! English native speakers welcome!

News Writer - Details here

The Dell XPS 13 9305 turned up on the Chinese retail site JD.com last month, and now the laptop has appeared on Dell country-specific sites such as the US and UK. On Dell US, the XPS 13 9305 starts at US$849.99 for the model with the Intel Core i3-115G4 chip, 8 GB RAM, and 256 GB SSD, while US$1,249.99 secures the top-end SKU with Intel Core i7-1165G7, 16 GB RAM, and 512 GB SSD. Shoppers in the UK get a choice between an i5-1135G7 and i7-1165G7, with various configuration options taking the XPS 13 9305 from £999.00 up to £1,399.00 (4K model).

There are a couple of differences between the new XPS 13 9310 and even newer XPS 13 9305 beyond the starting price (the Dell XPS 13 9310 starts at US$1,099.99). The cheaper variant is slightly lighter (1.16 kg non-touch vs. 1.2 kg non-touch), but more importantly, Dell has cut costs in regard to the display: The XPS 13 9305 has a 16:9 aspect ratio, 1920x1080 resolution, and it offers an 80.7% screen-to-body ratio. That is certainly nothing to turn your nose up at, but the XPS 13 9310 has a 16:10 aspect ratio, 1920x1200 resolution (for the FHD+ model), and a much more attractive 91.5% screen-to-body ratio.

Once you learn about the display differences between the Dell XPS 13 9305 and 9310, it’s hard to ignore the considerable “chin” bezel on the cheaper model, especially when directly compared to the impressive screen of the 9310 SKU (see image below). However, offering a cheaper XPS 13 is a prudent move by Dell that gives laptop enthusiasts a less financially prohibitive entrance into the world of the very well-received XPS range. The Dell XPS 13 9305 is now available to customize and buy and free standard shipping is included with a purchase.

Buy the Dell XPS 13 9310 on Amazon

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Dell XPS 13 9305 (L) and XPS 13 9310 (R). (Image source: Dell)
Dell XPS 13 9305 (L) and XPS 13 9310 (R). (Image source: Dell)
Dell XPS 13 9305 configuration options. (Image source: Dell)
Dell XPS 13 9305 configuration options. (Image source: Dell)

Source(s)

Dell US (1/2) UK (1/2) via VideoCardz

Read all 4 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Daniel R Deakin
Daniel R Deakin - Managing Editor News - 2410 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012
My interest in technology began after I was presented with an Atari 800XL home computer in the mid-1980s. I especially enjoy writing about technological advances, compelling rumors, and intriguing tech-related leaks. I have a degree in International Relations and Strategic Studies and count my family, reading, writing, and travel as the main passions of my life. I have been with Notebookcheck since 2012.
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > News > News Archive > Newsarchive 2021 03 > Dell XPS 13 9305 goes global: Cheaper and lighter than the XPS 13 9310 but at a considerable screen-to-body ratio cost
Daniel R Deakin, 2021-03- 9 (Update: 2021-03- 9)