According to a Guardian exclusive, it has been revealed that Australia's consumer watchdog, the ACCC, conducted a sting-operation on Apple earlier in the year. In the operation, the ACCC called 13 different Apple retailers to ask about fixing broken speakers. It was made clear in the calls that the "owner" had previously had their screen replaced by a third-party repairshop in an unrelated repair. In every instance, Apple responded by telling the caller (untruthfully) that the company was not required to — and would not — repair any phone under warranty that had been serviced by a non-Apple entity.
In accordance with Australian consumer law, the customer is protected from defective or low-quality products by giving them a right to a repair or replacement. Apple has responded to the suit by claiming that the sting operation carried out by the ACCC did not result in breaches of the law because the calls turned out to be based on "hypothetical circumstances". Apple claimed that somehow, "real" customers calling the store would have been notified of their right to repair.
Last year, Apple faced a case regarding the infamous 'error 53' message, which Apple used to disable iPhones that had their fingerprint sensors replaced in third-party repair shops. The case was thrown out, however.
Are you a techie who knows how to translate? Then join our Team!
Details here
Source(s)
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones