Asus Memo Pad FHD 10

Specifications

Pricecompare

Reviews for the Asus Memo Pad FHD 10

98% Asus MeMO Pad FHD10 (WLAN, 32 GB)
Source: Tablet PC2 - Heft 4/2014
Das Experiment, ein Intel-basiertes Tablet mit Android-Betriebssystem zu bestücken, ist Asus mit dem MeMO Pad FHD10 perfekt gelungen. Elegant kann sich das Tablet jetzt aufs Siegerpodest schwingen.
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/01/2014
Rating: Total score: 98%

60% ASUS MeMO Pad FHD 10
Source: Laptop Mag Archive.org version
ASUS' $329 MeMO Pad FHD 10 offers an attractive design, some useful apps and utilities, and excellent battery life. Unfortunately, its 1920 x 1200-pixel display is disappointingly dim, and its Intel Atom processor can be sluggish during everyday use.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/16/2013
Rating: Total score: 60%

Asus MeMO Pad FHD 10 preview: 10" Android tablet for full HD entertainment
Source: Tech Advisor Archive.org version
The ASUS MeMO Pad FHD 10 runs the Android 4.2 Jelly Bean version of Android though ASUS does pre-load a number of its own apps. These include SuperNote Lite, and the ASUS Studio photo editing utility. There's also the addition of Miracast compatibility, which allows video to be streamed wirelessly to a compatible TV.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/23/2013

70% Asus Memo Pad HD 7 review: Asus follows its Nexus successes with another tiny for the budget market
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
As a budget tablet, the Memo Pad HD 7 perfectly fits the bill. It's fast enough, has all the features you'd expect and a particularly vibrant screen. It's keenly priced and generally offers an excellent user experience. It's also light enough to use comfortably for extended periods. There's no 3G or 4G version of the HD 7 available, so if accessing the internet on the move is a priority, the Asus FonePad is probably the most viable option, despite its lack of camera and slightly inferior performance and audio/visual quality.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/17/2013
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 60% features: 80% workmanship: 60%

Foreign Reviews

92% Asus MeMO Pad FHD10
Source: SFT - Heft 3/2014
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/01/2014
Rating: Total score: 92%

87% Asus MeMO Pad FHD10
Source: Chip (Print) - Heft 2/2014
Review Type Unknown, , Very Short, Date: 01/01/2014
Rating: Total score: 87% features: 79% display: 90% mobility: 79% emissions: 84%

98% Asus MeMO Pad FHD10 (WLAN, 32 GB)
Source: Computerbild - Heft 24/2013
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 11/16/2013
Rating: Total score: 98%

88% Asus MeMO Pad FHD10 (WLAN, 32 GB)
Source: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 12/2013
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 11/01/2013
Rating: Total score: 88%

80% Asus Memo Pad Full Hd Im Praxistest
Source: Cyberbloc DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/02/2013
Rating: Total score: 80%

81% Mögen die Spiele beginnen: Asus MeMo Pad FHD 10 im Test
Source: Mobicroco DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/01/2013
Rating: Total score: 81% features: 81% workmanship: 78% ergonomy: 83%

93% Asus MeMO Pad FHD10 (WLAN, 32 GB)
Source: SFT - Heft 10/2013
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 09/01/2013
Rating: Total score: 93%

70% Das bislang günstigste 10-Zoll-Tablet von Asus
Source: Onlinekosten.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Positive: low priced tablet; high quality workmanship; fast handling Negative: mediocre camera; low brightness
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/11/2013
Rating: Total score: 70%

Das 10-Zoll-Gesamtpaket
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Positive: successful allround package; good display; very good internet connection
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/29/2013

90% Scharfes Intel-Tablet zum verlockenden Preis
Source: Onlinekosten.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Positive: very good display; clear resolution and colours; device made for users who read frequently
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/08/2013
Rating: Total score: 90%

Review: ASUS MeMo Pad FHD 10 y MeMo Pad HD 7.
Source: Hispazone ES→EN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/28/2013

79% ASUS MemoPad FHD 10: il tablet economico solo nel prezzo
Source: Techzilla.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/01/2014
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%

80% Asus Memo Pad FHD 10
Source: PCM NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/22/2013
Rating: Total score: 80%

75% Recenzja tabletów ASUS MemoPad 8 i MemoPad 10
Source: Tablety PL→EN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 02/04/2014
Rating: Total score: 75%

83% Recenzja tabletu Asus MemoPad FHD 10
Source: Tablety PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/30/2013
Rating: Total score: 83%

Dziesięciocalowy Asus z Rockchipem
Source: PC Lab.pl PL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good speakers; good GPS; good design. Negative: Mediocre glossy display; relatively short battery life; no HDMI.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/23/2014

Обзор планшета ASUS MeMO Pad FHD 10: проще купить, чем произнести
Source: Zoom RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Very good ergonomics, performance, quality, and screen.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/25/2013

80% Teszt: Asus MeMO Pad 10FHD – Godzilla megjelent
Source: Wikitech HU→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/27/2013
Rating: Total score: 80% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%

ASUS MeMo Pad 10 FHD LTE táblagép teszt
Source: Geeks.hu HU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Very powerful hardware and extra software; colors and viewing angles of the display.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/12/2013

Comment

Model:

The Asus Memo Pad FHD 10 is the latest 10 inch tablet offering from Asus. The plastic casing is well designed and sturdy, managing to give off an impression of quality. Weighing in at 0.57 kg, this is a light device for its class, but its dimensions are quite bulky despite low weight. Dual core Intel Atom Z2560 with a clock speed of 0.933 GHz and generous 2 GB of memory makes for decent performance, though the PowerVR SGX544 responsible for graphics is less than one might hope for at this price. Most tasks should run smoothly, with only a few minor instances of lag, but the most demanding games will tax this system just slightly beyond its capabilities.

A plastic stand is included with the device, for those who wish to display their devices on a desk. Weight and design of the cheaply made stand causes it to be precarious if used in portrait mode. The display is a 10.1 inch, 16:10 resolution with 1920x1200 pixels. 10 point multi touch is supported and it works smoothly, but unfortunately the automatic orientation switching can be a little stilted and slow. While 240 dpi is a pixel density that falls behind compared to similar devices out there on the market, the visuals are rendered well, with nice blacks and good contrast by this IPS screen. The battery life is on the tolerable side, lasting approximately 7 hours of light to moderate use. Overall, this is a decent device, but nothing really makes it stand out above other similarly priced devices.

PowerVR SGX544MP2: OpenGL ES 2.0 compatible with 8 pixel and 4 vertex shaders

These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

Intel Atom: The Intel Atom series is a 64-Bit (not every model supports 64bit) microprocessor for cheap and small notebooks (so called netbooks), MIDs, or UMPCs. The speciality of the new architecture is the "in order" execution (instead of the usual and faster "out of order" execution). Therefore, the transistor count of the Atom series is much lower and, thus, cheaper to produce. Furthermore, the power consumption is very low. The performance per Megahertz is therfore worse than the old Pentium 3M (1,2 GHz on par with a 1.6 GHz Atom).

Z2560: SoC with an integrated dual-core Atom based CPU clocked at 0.9 - 1.6 (short bursts), a 400 MHz PowerVR SGX 544MP2 graphics card, and a dual channel LPDDR2 memory controller.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

10.10":

This is a standard display format for tablet computers or small convertibles. You see more on the screen than on a smartphone but you can't use big resolutions well. On the other hand, mobility is not a problem.

Asus: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. is a major Taiwanese computer hardware manufacturer based in Taipei, founded in 1989. Under the Asus brand name, the company manufactures a wide range of products, including laptops, desktops, motherboards, graphics cards, monitors, smartphones and networking equipment, complete systems and PC components for end users.

Under the ROG (Republic of Gamers) brand name, ASUS manufactures gaming laptops known by gamers for their powerful specifications, dedicated graphics cards, high refresh rate displays and advanced cooling systems.

Beyond gaming, a wide range of notebooks are offered for different needs and budgets, from ultra-slim and lightweight ultrabooks to versatile 2-in-1 convertibles and budget-friendly options. In 2023, Asus had a 7% global market share of the PC market.

Customer satisfaction with ASUS notebooks concerns performance, the features, and the good price-performance ratio of ASUS notebooks. However, as with any brand, there are occasional reports of problems such as overheating, driver compatibility, or build quality issues.

82.61%: This rating is slightly above average, there are somewhat more devices with worse ratings. However, clear purchase recommendations look different.

» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.

Similar devices from a different Manufacturer

Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU

Devices with the same GPU

Devices with Same Screen Size and/or Weight