Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 810 vs Qualcomm Adreno 825

Qualcomm Adreno 810

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 810

The Adreno 810 is an integrated graphics unit for smartphones and tablets that is being used for the first time in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 and is intended for use in Android-based mid-range devices.

According to Wikipedia, the GPU operates at up to 895 or 1,050 MHz. It supports common graphics APIs such as Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2 and OpenCL 2.0 FP, but not ray tracing.

According to Qualcomm, the GPU is up to 40% faster than the previous generation (hence probably the Adreno 710). In our benchmarks, the GPU does not stand out quite as clearly from the 710, but on average it remains well ahead.

The Adreno 810 supports displays with an extended Full HD resolution and a refresh rate of up to 144 Hz. The HDR standards HLG, HDR10, HDR10+ and HDR Vivid are also supported.

Qualcomm Adreno 825

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 825

The Qualcomm Adreno 825 is an integrated graphics adapter that debuted in April 2025. It has at least 768 unified shaders (more likely is a higher number, such as 1,024 or 1,280) but few specifics are known, as of this writing.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 810Qualcomm Adreno 825
Adreno 800 Series
Adreno 840 compare @ 1.2 GHz
Adreno 830 compare 1536 @ 1.1 GHz
Adreno 829 compare @ 1.1 GHz
Adreno 825
Adreno 810 @ 1.05 GHz
Adreno 840 compare @ 1.2 GHz
Adreno 830 compare 1536 @ 1.1 GHz
Adreno 829 compare @ 1.1 GHz
Adreno 825
Adreno 810 @ 1.05 GHz
iGPUIntegrated GraphicsIntegrated Graphics
Core Speed1050 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2OpenGL 2.0, OpenCL 3.2, Vulkan 1.3
technology4 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement07.05.2021 02.04.2025
PredecessorAdreno 642
Memory TypeLPDDR5x
Displays2 Displays (max.)
CPU in Adreno 810GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 48 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 48 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 38 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 825GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM87358 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 353     avg: 383.7     median: 382 (1%)     max: 413 Points
min: 1784     avg: 1805     median: 1785 (4%)     max: 1847 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3766     avg: 4207     median: 4186 (2%)     max: 4457 Points
min: 17504     avg: 17778     median: 17885 (9%)     max: 17946 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 955     avg: 1072     median: 1078 (1%)     max: 1130 Points
min: 4408     avg: 4466     median: 4490 (5%)     max: 4499 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
0 Points (0%)
min: 8264     avg: 8393     median: 8357 (4%)     max: 8557 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 6078     avg: 6091     median: 6081.5 (26%)     max: 6122 Points
min: 16582     avg: 17486     median: 17486 (74%)     max: 18390 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 6697     avg: 6720     median: 6706 (17%)     max: 6770 Points
min: 24714     avg: 26213     median: 26212.5 (65%)     max: 27711 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 7.6     avg: 8.6     median: 8.8 (3%)     max: 9.6 fps
min: 31     avg: 33.7     median: 35 (13%)     max: 35 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 17     avg: 19.6     median: 20 (4%)     max: 22 fps
min: 68     avg: 75.3     median: 79 (14%)     max: 79 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 44     avg: 51.2     median: 52 (4%)     max: 57 fps
min: 174     avg: 195.7     median: 205 (15%)     max: 208 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 34     avg: 36     median: 35 (3%)     max: 43 fps
min: 136     avg: 140.3     median: 142 (13%)     max: 143 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 61     avg: 63.1     median: 62 (1%)     max: 66 fps
min: 237     avg: 248.3     median: 253 (5%)     max: 255 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 84     avg: 85.7     median: 85 (4%)     max: 88 fps
min: 311     avg: 328     median: 332 (14%)     max: 341 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 810
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 130     avg: 133.3     median: 131 (1%)     max: 142 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 825
min: 570     avg: 582     median: 585 (5%)     max: 590 fps
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 153422     avg: 194155     median: 202014 (14%)     max: 208068 Points
min: 777835     avg: 815057     median: 833213 (58%)     max: 834122 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 49.36     avg: 50.6     median: 51 (1%)     max: 51.29 fps
min: 246.88     avg: 255.1     median: 255.1 (6%)     max: 263.33 fps
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 2907     avg: 3406     median: 3351 (1%)     max: 3642 Points
min: 13397     avg: 13546     median: 13546 (3%)     max: 13695 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 3943     avg: 4522     median: 4723 (1%)     max: 4789 Points
min: 18628     avg: 18816     median: 18815.5 (5%)     max: 19003 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
30453 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
53532 Points (71%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 3.91     avg: 5.2     median: 4.4 (2%)     max: 9.04 Watt
min: 7     avg: 10.4     median: 8.9 (3%)     max: 15.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 810 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 825 → 409% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Adreno 810:
52.2  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 810:
43.2 44 45.9 58.6 ~ 48 fps
124%
Adreno 825:
59.3  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 810:
29.7 34 36.7 40.9 ~ 35 fps
169%
Adreno 825:
58.6 59.3 ~ 59 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 810:
54.2 59.5 88.9 ~ 68 fps
174%
Adreno 825:
117.3 119.2 ~ 118 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 810:
59  fps
high
100%
Adreno 810:
55.4 58.4 59.5 ~ 58 fps
103%
Adreno 825:
59.6 59.7 ~ 60 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 810:
38 39.7 39.8 39.9 ~ 39 fps
103%
Adreno 825:
39.2 39.8 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 810:
94  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 810:
58 59.1 ~ 59 fps
100%
Adreno 825:
59  fps
high
100%
Adreno 810:
56.5 58.2 ~ 57 fps
130%
Adreno 825:
58.6 89 ~ 74 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 810 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 825 → 129%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 120%

Qualcomm Adreno 810Qualcomm Adreno 825
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal52.2
Genshin Impact483559.359
PUBG Mobile685958391186040
Dead Trigger 294
Asphalt 9: Legends59575974
Qualcomm Adreno 810Qualcomm Adreno 825
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3
1

1


2
1

2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1





2

2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 01. 09:40:07

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13034 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13111 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1772354407s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 01 Mar 2026 05:14:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.011s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13034 +0.018s ... 0.03s

#9 got single benchmarks 13034 +0.013s ... 0.042s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 13111 +0s ... 0.042s

#11 got single benchmarks 13111 +0.005s ... 0.047s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.047s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.051s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.061s

#15 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.061s

#16 Got 37 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.067s

#17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.067s

#18 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.067s

#19 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.069s

#20 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.069s

#21 return log +0.123s ... 0.193s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)