Qualcomm Adreno 510 vs Qualcomm Adreno 505
Qualcomm Adreno 510 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 510 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 and 652 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.
Compared the the faster Adreno 530, the 510 is currently produced in the older 28nm process (650 and 652) and should offer less ALUs. The clock speed is not disclosed.
Early benchmarks and performance ratings from Qualcomm position the GPU on a level with the old Adreno 330 (former high end GPU) in the Snapdragon 810. Therefore, it should be able to handle most Android games up to Full HD fluently.
Qualcomm Adreno 505 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 505 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 / 435 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth. Compared to the faster Adreno 506 , the 505 is manufactured in the older 28nm process and offers less raw performance.
Qualcomm Adreno 510 Qualcomm Adreno 505 Adreno 500 Series Architecture Adreno 500 Adreno 500 Shared Memory yes yes API DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan technology 14 nm 14 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) Date of Announcement 15.12.2015 15.12.2015 Core Speed 450 MHz
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 21087 avg: 21766 median: 21533 (2%) max: 23175 Points
min: 7924 avg: 10477 median: 10069 (1%) max: 13656 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
5627 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
10835 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1381 avg: 1454 median: 1441.5 (6%) max: 1579 Points
min: 482 avg: 632 median: 603.5 (3%) max: 835 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1354 avg: 1395 median: 1389.5 (3%) max: 1459 Points
min: 423 avg: 552 median: 529.5 (1%) max: 735 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
971 Points (5%)
min: 0 avg: 371 median: 365 (2%) max: 505 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
867 Points (3%)
min: 0 avg: 309.7 median: 305 (1%) max: 432 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 1313 avg: 1367 median: 1356.5 (12%) max: 1507 Points
min: 465 avg: 628 median: 602 (5%) max: 835 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 1252 avg: 1299 median: 1292 (8%) max: 1379 Points
min: 404 avg: 550 median: 527 (3%) max: 735 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 855 avg: 881 median: 872 (4%) max: 965 Points
min: 230 avg: 330.3 median: 316 (2%) max: 448 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 745 avg: 773 median: 766.5 (3%) max: 827 Points
min: 188 avg: 273 median: 262 (1%) max: 372 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.88 avg: 1.1 median: 1.2 (0%) max: 1.2 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 2.6 avg: 3.3 median: 3.6 (0%) max: 3.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 3.2 avg: 5.2 median: 5.4 (1%) max: 6 fps
min: 2.1 avg: 2.7 median: 2.6 (0%) max: 3.6 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 4.6 avg: 8.9 median: 9.5 (0%) max: 10 fps
min: 2.2 avg: 4.6 median: 4.6 (0%) max: 6.6 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 9.2 avg: 14.2 median: 14.5 (1%) max: 17 fps
min: 4.6 avg: 8 median: 7.1 (0%) max: 19 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 510 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 22 avg: 30.8 median: 31 (0%) max: 36 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 505 min: 11 avg: 17.7 median: 17 (0%) max: 25 fps
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
44.8 fps (74%)
33.5 fps (55%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
15120 Points (34%)
8015 Points (18%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
26078 Points (58%)
min: 16486 avg: 16610 median: 16609.5 (37%) max: 16733 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
5.2 fps (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
6078 Points (2%)
min: 2589 avg: 3292 median: 3292 (1%) max: 3995 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
2559 Points (4%)
min: 1032 avg: 1168 median: 1167.5 (2%) max: 1303 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
4270 Points (93%)
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 510 → 100% n=18 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 505 → 47% n=18
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Adreno 505:
30 [X] Xiaomi Redmi 7A 1.30.2.4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 2GHz
Adreno 505
min:
26 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Xiaomi Redmi 8A 1.32.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 2GHz
Adreno 505
min:
1 fps, max:
31 fps
30 31 [X] BQ Aquaris VS Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
min:
23 fps, max:
32 fps
31 31 [X] Huawei Y7 2018 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
min:
23 fps, max:
32 fps
32 ~ 31 fps
Adreno 505:
30 [X] BQ Aquaris VS Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 [X] Huawei Y7 2018 1.22.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
min:
17 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Xiaomi Redmi 7A 1.30.2.4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 2GHz
Adreno 505
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Xiaomi Redmi 8A 1.32.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 2GHz
Adreno 505
min:
5 fps, max:
31 fps
30 32 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 505:
42 47 [X] Huawei Y7 2018 1.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
min:
31 fps, max:
55 fps
47 58 ~ 49 fps
Adreno 505:
41 46 47 [X] Huawei Y7 2018 1.10.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
min:
1 fps, max:
60 fps
58 ~ 48 fps
80%
Adreno 505:
30 30 30 30 [X] LG Q6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
30 30 [X] Medion Lifetab P10606 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
50 [X] Nokia 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
52 [X] Honor 6A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
53 [X] Lenovo K6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
54 [X] Nokia 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
~ 39 fps
100%
Adreno 510:
29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 505:
29 [X] Lenovo K6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
30 30 30 [X] Nokia 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
30 [X] Nokia 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
30 [X] LG Q6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
30 [X] Honor 6A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
30 ~ 30 fps
96%
Adreno 505:
19 19 24 [X] Nokia 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
25 [X] LG Q6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
27 [X] Lenovo K6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
27 30 [X] Nokia 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
30 [X] Honor 6A Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
30 ~ 26 fps
Adreno 505:
60 [X] Medion Lifetab P10606 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 1.4GHz
Adreno 505
fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 510 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 505 → 92% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 80%
Qualcomm Adreno 505 low med. high ultra QHD 4K PUBG Mobile 25 24 Arena of Valor 31 30 Shadow Fight 3 49 48 Dead Trigger 2 39 Asphalt 8: Airborne 30 26 Asphalt 9: Legends 29 21 Temple Run 2 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 3 1 2 2 1 1
Qualcomm Adreno 510 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Dead Trigger 2 49 Asphalt 8: Airborne 30 27 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.28
log 09. 00:56:26
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 7360 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 7444 +0s ... 0s
#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731110186s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#5 composed specs +0.025s ... 0.025s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.025s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7360 +0.018s ... 0.043s
#9 got single benchmarks 7360 +0.013s ... 0.056s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7444 +0s ... 0.056s
#11 got single benchmarks 7444 +0.029s ... 0.086s
#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.086s
#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.019s ... 0.105s
#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.105s
#15 Got 73 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.117s
#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.117s
#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.117s
#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.12s
#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.12s
#20 return log +0.002s ... 0.122s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)