Acer Swift Lite 14 AI SFL14-51M, Ultra 5 115U
Specifications

Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 1 scores (from 2 reviews)
Reviews for the Acer Swift Lite 14 AI SFL14-51M, Ultra 5 115U
Source: Exhibit.tech

For ₹59,999, the Acer Swift Lite 14 hits a sweet spot. It’s stylish, ultra-portable, and offers an OLED experience at a price where most laptops are still stuck with IPS panels. It’s not for hardcore gamers or full-time video editors, but for students, professionals, creators on the go, and even frequent travellers, it’s almost perfect. Lightweight enough to carry anywhere, powerful enough to handle multitasking, and that OLED display? It elevates everything you do. If you’ve got ₹60K to spend and want a laptop that feels premium without emptying your wallet, this is one of the best deals you’ll find right now.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/30/2025
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 80% display: 95% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Jagat Review
ID→ENPositive: Ultra-lightweight; beautiful display; decent processor; nice performance; 16GB RAM; affordable price. Negative: Only iGPU.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/02/2025
Comment
Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake): Integrated graphics card based on the Xe LPG architecture (similar to the dedicated Arc GPUs, but with a focus on efficiency). Provides 4 Xe cores (64 Xe vector engines) and 4 ray tracing units.
Modern games should be playable with these graphics cards at low settings and resolutions. Casual gamers may be happy with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Ultra 5 115U: A lower-end Meteor Lake chip that debuted some time in 2024. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has 8 cores (2 + 4 + 2) and 10 threads at its disposal. Due to its slightly lower clock speeds and a lower number of E-cores, the 115U should be 10% to 15% slower than the 125U in multi-threaded tasks. The 4-core Arc Graphics, in the meantime, should be just a little slower than the aging 96 EU Iris Xe GPU.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.