Acer Swift Neo AI 14 SFN14-54H
Specifications
Price comparison
Average of 1 scores (from 1 reviews)
Reviews for the Acer Swift Neo AI 14 SFN14-54H
Source: 91mobiles
So, is the Acer Swift Neo worth the Rs. 61,990 price tag? Well, if you’re a performance enthusiast, this one might not be for you. There are certainly better-performing laptops on the market, including some from Acer itself. For example, the Acer Swift Go 14 swaps the OLED panel for an IPS touchscreen display and comes with the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H processor, all for around Rs. 70,000. While it’s an older model, it gives you an idea of how long this processor series has been around. That being said, the Acer Swift Neo shines in other areas. It offers a striking design that’s not only lightweight but also sleek and stylish. You get a great OLED display, an impressive range of ports, and excellent battery life. Sure, it may not win any speed races, but not everyone needs a performance powerhouse. For those who are looking for a well-designed, portable laptop that looks premium without breaking the bank and can handle day-to-day tasks with ease, the Swift Neo is a solid choice.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/30/2025
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 70% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75%
Comment
Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake): Integrated graphics card based on the Xe LPG architecture (similar to the dedicated Arc GPUs, but with a focus on efficiency). Provides 4 Xe cores (64 Xe vector engines) and 4 ray tracing units.
Modern games should be playable with these graphics cards at low settings and resolutions. Casual gamers may be happy with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Ultra 5 115U: A lower-end Meteor Lake chip that debuted some time in 2024. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has 8 cores (2 + 4 + 2) and 10 threads at its disposal. Due to its slightly lower clock speeds and a lower number of E-cores, the 115U should be 10% to 15% slower than the 125U in multi-threaded tasks. The 4-core Arc Graphics, in the meantime, should be just a little slower than the aging 96 EU Iris Xe GPU.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
