Acer Aspire One Happy
Specifications

Price comparison
Average of 7 scores (from 8 reviews)
Reviews for the Acer Aspire One Happy
Source: PC Pro
Archive.org versionIn the end, the Aspire One Happy isn’t particularly cheap, fast or comfortable to use. If you’re purchasing netbooks, you could do better.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/18/2012
Rating: Total score: 50% price: 50% performance: 50% features: 50% ergonomy: 50%
Source: Good Gear Guide
Archive.org versionWith excellent battery life, a light weight and a slim design, the Acer Aspire One Happy is perfect for business users, students and basically anyone who is always on the go. Its small size makes it easy to use while on public transport (as long as you have a seat), and frequent flyers should appreciate the netbook's ability to get through five hours of standard-definition video playback on a single charge.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/07/2010
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techcentral.my
Archive.org versionOverall, the Acer Aspire One Happy will make a great Christmas gift for anyone who needs a netbook.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/03/2010
Rating: Total score: 90%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Chip.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/18/2011
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 100% performance: 51% features: 75% display: 74% mobility: 100% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Computerbild - 26/2010

Comparison, , Long, Date: 12/01/2010
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 70% features: 82% display: 82% ergonomy: 82% emissions: 94%
Source: Notebook Italia
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/24/2010
Source: Techno Zoom
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/10/2010
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% mobility: 75% workmanship: 70%
Source: 01Net
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/24/2010
Rating: Total score: 60%
Comment
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150: Integrated (shared memory) graphics card in the intel Atom N4xx CPUs. Minimally faster than an old GMA 950 and therefore not suited for 3D games or HD videos (only MPEG2 acceleration).
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Atom: The Intel Atom series is a 64-Bit (not every model supports 64bit) microprocessor for cheap and small notebooks (so called netbooks), MIDs, or UMPCs. The speciality of the new architecture is the "in order" execution (instead of the usual and faster "out of order" execution). Therefore, the transistor count of the Atom series is much lower and, thus, cheaper to produce. Furthermore, the power consumption is very low. The performance per Megahertz is therfore worse than the old Pentium 3M (1,2 GHz on par with a 1.6 GHz Atom).
N550: Dual core Atom with a TDP of only 8.5 Watt. Because of the slow clock speed of 1.5 GHz it may be sometimes even slower than a N465 Atom CPU.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.


