Acer Aspire One Happy
Average of 7 scores (from 8 reviews)
Reviews for the Acer Aspire One Happy
Source: PC Pro
In the end, the Aspire One Happy isn’t particularly cheap, fast or comfortable to use. If you’re purchasing netbooks, you could do better.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/18/2012
Rating: Total score: 50% price: 50% performance: 50% features: 50% ergonomy: 50%
Source: Good Gear Guide
With excellent battery life, a light weight and a slim design, the Acer Aspire One Happy is perfect for business users, students and basically anyone who is always on the go. Its small size makes it easy to use while on public transport (as long as you have a seat), and frequent flyers should appreciate the netbook's ability to get through five hours of standard-definition video playback on a single charge.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/07/2010
Rating: Total score: 80%
Overall, the Acer Aspire One Happy will make a great Christmas gift for anyone who needs a netbook.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/03/2010
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Chip.de DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/18/2011
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 100% performance: 51% features: 75% display: 74% mobility: 100% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Computerbild - 26/2010
Comparison, , Long, Date: 12/01/2010
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 70% features: 82% display: 82% ergonomy: 82% emissions: 94%
Source: Notebook Italia IT→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/24/2010
Source: Techno Zoom IT→EN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/10/2010
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% mobility: 75% workmanship: 70%
Source: 01Net FR→EN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/24/2010
Rating: Total score: 60%
CommentIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150: Integrated (shared memory) graphics card in the intel Atom N4xx CPUs. Minimally faster than an old GMA 950 and therefore not suited for 3D games or HD videos (only MPEG2 acceleration). These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Atom: The Intel Atom series is a 64-Bit (not every model supports 64bit) microprocessor for cheap and small notebooks (so called netbooks), MIDs, or UMPCs. The speciality of the new architecture is the "in order" execution (instead of the usual and faster "out of order" execution). Therefore, the transistor count of the Atom series is much lower and, thus, cheaper to produce. Furthermore, the power consumption is very low. The performance per Megahertz is therfore worse than the old Pentium 3M (1,2 GHz on par with a 1.6 GHz Atom).
N550: Dual core Atom with a TDP of only 8.5 Watt. Because of the slow clock speed of 1.5 GHz it may be sometimes even slower than a N465 Atom CPU.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
This is a typical display size for tablets and small convertibles.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.
This weight is typical for big tablets, small subnotebooks, ultrabooks and convertibles with a 10-11 inch display-diagonal.
Acer: The company was founded under the name of Multitech in Taiwan in 1976 and renamed to Acer or Acer Group in 1987. The product range includes, for example, laptops, tablets, smartphones, desktops, monitors and televisions. Gateway Inc. and Packard Bell also belong to the Group and sell their own laptops.
While Acer still had the third largest global market share in the notebook segment in 2008, it ranked 6th in 2016 with a market share of 6% after they had continuously lost market shares.
There are dozens of Acer laptop reviews per month, the ratings are average (as of 2016). Gateway, which has an own laptop line-up, has also belonged to the Acer Group since 2007.
72.57%: This rating is bad. Most notebooks are better rated. This is not a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.