Samsung N350-JA03UK
Specifications

Price comparison
Average of 5 scores (from 7 reviews)
Reviews for the Samsung N350-JA03UK
Source: Reg Hardware
Archive.org versionSmall, well-designed and comfortable to use, the N350 could have been a great little netbook. However, the relatively poor battery life and minimal performance boost offered by the dual-core Atom make its high price somewhat unpalatable.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/31/2011
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Computer Active
Archive.org versionSmall and relatively cheap, netbook computers are great for tasks such as web browsing and word processing. The Samsung N350 is impressively compact, but its battery life is lacklustre and the benefits offered by the dual-core processor are minimal. It's also more expensive than most 10in netbooks, with cheaper models such as Acer's D260 offering far longer battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/17/2011
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: IT Reviews
Archive.org versionThere no denying the N350 is a well-crafted netbook. It's small, light and great to type on. However, the high price and disappointing battery life hamper its overall appeal. The dual-core Atom chip is one of the main reasons for the high price, but the fact is you really don't get much of a performance boost from it. Ultimately, Samsung's N230 is a better offering. It has the same great design, twice the battery power and the performance of its single-core processor isn't far off that of the dual-core model on this N350.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/22/2010
Source: PC Pro
Archive.org versionA little pricey and battery life is below par; not our favourite Samsung netbook
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/07/2010
Rating: Total score: 50% price: 50% performance: 33% features: 50% ergonomy: 50%
Source: It Pro
Archive.org versionWe review Samsung's latest dual-core netbook to see if it's worth buying.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/18/2010
Rating: Total score: 50%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Retera
RU→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/30/2010
Rating: Total score: 49% performance: 16% display: 43% mobility: 64% emissions: 57%
Source: Datormagazin
SV→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/16/2010
Comment
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150: Integrated (shared memory) graphics card in the intel Atom N4xx CPUs. Minimally faster than an old GMA 950 and therefore not suited for 3D games or HD videos (only MPEG2 acceleration).
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Atom: The Intel Atom series is a 64-Bit (not every model supports 64bit) microprocessor for cheap and small notebooks (so called netbooks), MIDs, or UMPCs. The speciality of the new architecture is the "in order" execution (instead of the usual and faster "out of order" execution). Therefore, the transistor count of the Atom series is much lower and, thus, cheaper to produce. Furthermore, the power consumption is very low. The performance per Megahertz is therfore worse than the old Pentium 3M (1,2 GHz on par with a 1.6 GHz Atom).
N550: Dual core Atom with a TDP of only 8.5 Watt. Because of the slow clock speed of 1.5 GHz it may be sometimes even slower than a N465 Atom CPU.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
Similar devices with the Same Specs
Similar devices from a different Manufacturer




