Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A6-9220 vs Intel Pentium Gold 4417U

AMD A6-9220

► remove from comparison AMD A6-9220

The AMD A6-9220 is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. The 9210 is a mid-range Stoney Ridge processor (dual-core version of Bristol Ridge) and integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 2.5 - 2.9 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R4 GPU, probably with 192 shaders at 655 MHz, as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Because of the significantly lower clock range, the A6-9220 should be noticeably slower than the A9-9410. In the Cinebench R15 Multi benchmark e.g. it was around 15% slower in our benchmarks (see below). The single core benchmarks were quite similar overall.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) GPU is probably similar to the R5 with 192 active shader units (3 compute cores), but a reduced clock of just 655 instead of 800 MHz. More details about the GPU are available in the linked articles above. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A6-9220 with 15 Watts, but it can be configured between 10-15 Watts. This means the APU is a good choice for thin and light notebooks.

Intel Pentium Gold 4417U

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium 4417U

The Intel Pentium Gold Processor 4417U is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry level laptops based on the Kaby Lake Refresh generation (not Coffee Lake). It was announced in February 2019 and integrates two "big" cores (similar to the Core i3, i5 and i7 CPUs) clocked at 2.3 GHz (fixed, no Turbo Boost). The integrated graphics card is named Intel HD Graphics 610 and offers 12 EUs clocked at 300 - 950 MHz. The integrated memory controller supports slower memory speeds than the faster i3 and i5 models (DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600) and dual channel memory.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

With a fixed clock speed of 2.3 GHz, the dual core CPU is clearly slower than models with Turbo Boost and high clock speeds for single thread performance. The multi thread performance however is also limited due to the two cores. The faster Core i5-8250U offers four processor cores and  fast Turbo Boost speeds therefore offers a much better performance. Still, the Pentium 4417U offers enough performance for daily tasks and non demanding applications.

Power Consumption

The chip is most likely manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. According to Intel it can be configured to 12.5 Watt at 800 MHz (cTDP-down) with a clearly reduced performance.

ModelAMD A6-9220Intel Pentium Gold 4417U
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Kaby Lake Refresh
CodenameStoney RidgeKaby Lake Refresh
Series: Kaby Lake Refresh Kaby Lake Refresh
AMD A9-9425 compare3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420e compare - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420 compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9410 compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9225 compare2.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220 « 2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9210 compare2.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120 compare2.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9010 compare2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9000 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220e compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i7-8650U compare1.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8550U compare1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8350U compare1.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8250U compare1.6 - 3.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8130U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4417U « 2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Clock2500 - 2900 MHz2300 MHz
L1 Cache160 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 4
TDP10-15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors1200 Million
Technology28 nm14 nm
Die Size124.5 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C
SocketBGABGA1356
FeaturesSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,Dual-Channel DDR4/LPDDR3 Memory Controller, HyperThreading
iGPUAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 610 (300 - 950 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.comark.intel.com
L3 Cache2 MB
$161 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
203 Points (23%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
472 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 109     avg: 111.5     median: 111.5 (1%)     max: 114 Points
228 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 68     avg: 68.5     median: 68.5 (21%)     max: 69 Points
89 Points (27%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.4 Points (2%)
2.6 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.8 Points (20%)
1.1 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2432 Points (15%)
3570 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3941 Points (3%)
8012 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
915 s (11%)
665 s (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
27.7 s (6%)
21.2 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
770 Points (1%)
1792 Points (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
8.7 fps (3%)
15.5 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
46.5 fps (11%)
81.1 fps (19%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1 GB/s (3%)
1.4 GB/s (4%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2253 Points (5%)
3204 Points (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
20.9 s (5%)
17.3 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
46.9 s (2%)
39.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1022 s (5%)
922 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 A6-9220 +
4236 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1467     avg: 1470     median: 1469.5 (4%)     max: 1472 Points
min: 2831     avg: 3011     median: 3010.5 (8%)     max: 3190 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
16010 Points (13%)
min: 28577     avg: 28749     median: 28749 (23%)     max: 28921 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
15125 Points (12%)
min: 27361     avg: 27522     median: 27521.5 (22%)     max: 27682 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
15704 Points (13%)
min: 29007     avg: 29032     median: 29032 (24%)     max: 29057 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1241 Points (3%)
min: 2590     avg: 2591     median: 2590.5 (7%)     max: 2591 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1721 Points (3%)
min: 3635     avg: 3644     median: 3644 (6%)     max: 3653 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
634 Points (3%)
min: 1369     avg: 1398     median: 1398 (6%)     max: 1427 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1960 Points (20%)
2695 Points (27%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2857 Points (3%)
5248 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1885 Points (26%)
2599 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2805 Points (7%)
5029 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
2921 Points (5%)
4882 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
1798 Points (35%)
2254 Points (44%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
3115 Points (5%)
5089 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1909 Points (29%)
2389 Points (36%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3245 Points (26%)
6053 Points (49%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2855 Points (26%)
5722 Points (52%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
3510 Points (7%)
4999 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
3822 Points (8%)
5090 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
3461 Points (9%)
5280 Points (14%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2416 ms (3%)
2162 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
162.1 ms (2%)
165.1 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
14724 Points (13%)
16702 Points (15%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
102 Points (21%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A6-9220 → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Gold 4417U → 155% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 21. 02:51:19

#0 checking url part for id 9326 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11489 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.032s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9326 +0.003s ... 0.035s

#7 got single benchmarks 9326 +0.013s ... 0.048s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11489 +0.003s ... 0.051s

#9 got single benchmarks 11489 +0.014s ... 0.065s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.065s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.365s ... 0.431s

#12 return log +0.03s ... 0.46s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)