ERROR: No CPU found with the ID:840

getCPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German CPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected) Intel Core i7-840QM vs vs MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz
Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-840QM vs vs MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz

Intel Core i7-840QM

► remove from comparison Intel 840QM

The Intel Core i7 840QM is a high end quad core CPU in 2010. It features 4 cores (quad core CPU) and Hyperthreading. Therefore, 8 threads can be worked on simultaneously.

Because of the Turbo Mode, the CPU is clocked with up to 3.2 GHz (if only one core is used, 2.93 for two cores, and 2 ghz with 4 cores) and therefore can perform very well in single core applications like older games.

The Core i7 line has an integrated memory controller for DDR3 bars (1066 or 1333) supporting a maximum of 8 GB. Therefore, the memory performance is very good (compared to older CPUs with external memory controllers). Still, this also leads to the higher TDP of the whole chip. ECC memory is not supported by the 840QM.

The Core micro-architecture is still very similar to the one used in the Core 2 CPUs, therefore the performance per MHz (neglecting the integrated memory controller, hyperthreading and Turbo Boost) is similar.

The power consumption of up to 45 Watt (TDP) is quite high for a laptop CPU and because of the Turbo Mode, the power consumption should reach these high values. Therefore, the CPU is only suited for large laptops.

MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz

► remove from comparison

The MediaTek MT8163 V/A is an ARM based entry-level to mid-range SoC for (Android based) tablets. It offers four ARM Cortex-A53 processor cores (quad-core) that are clocked with up to 1.5 GHz. Furthermore, an ARM Mali-T720 MP2 graphics card clocked at 600 MHz, a DDR3x32 1600Mbps memory controller, Bluetooth 4.0, 802.11 b/g/n, GPS and FM are integrated in the SoC.

The similar named MediaTek MT8163 V/B is the slower clocked version, with a CPU clock o up to 1.3 GHz (-6%) and GPU of up to 520 MHz (-13%).

The performance is situated in the entry level of 2015 and often similar to the Kirin 910T (see benchmark below).

ModelIntel Core i7-840QMMediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz
SeriesIntel Core i7Mediatek
CodenameClarksfieldCortex-A53
Series: Cortex-A53
Intel Core i7-940XM2.13 - 3.33 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-920XM2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-840QM « 1.86 - 3.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-820QM1.73 - 3.06 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-740QM1.73 - 2.93 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-720QM1.6 - 2.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
JLQ JR5101.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9352.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6592.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6582.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6552.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6502 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9302 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6201.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz « 1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT81611.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA19081.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1860 - 3200 MHz1500 MHz
FSB2500
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB
L3 Cache8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 4
TDP45 Watt
Transistors774 Million
Technology45 nm28 nm
Die Size296 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketRPGA989
Featuresintegrated DDR3-1066/1333 dual-channel memory controller, Turbo Boost, Hyper Threading, Virtualization Technology VT-x / VT-d, Trusted Execution Technology, Intel 64, Idel States, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitDDR3x32 memory controller 1600Mbps, T720 MP2@520MHz, internal Display up to 1366x768, HMID up to 1080p, H.265 1080p video decode, 13MP image signal processor, WiFi 802.11 a/b/g/n, embedded GPS module, Bluetooth 4.0, FM radio support, ARM TrustZone
Architecturex86ARM
$568 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
iGPUARM Mali-T720 MP2 (600 MHz)

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 840QM +
min: 3.21     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (4%)     max: 3.45 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 840QM +
min: 3354     avg: 3426     median: 3438.5 (21%)     max: 3474 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 840QM +
min: 9007     avg: 9316     median: 9266 (7%)     max: 9726 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 840QM +
min: 11085     avg: 11521     median: 11513 (8%)     max: 11857 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 840QM +
min: 4083     avg: 4200     median: 4199 (5%)     max: 4319 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 840QM +
min: 476.7     avg: 1014     median: 1282 (15%)     max: 1284 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 840QM +
min: 15.78     avg: 32     median: 40 (8%)     max: 40.2 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 840QM +
min: 3435     avg: 3519     median: 3531.5 (8%)     max: 3577 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 840QM +
min: 13     avg: 13.1     median: 13 (3%)     max: 13.26 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 840QM +
min: 29     avg: 29.4     median: 29 (1%)     max: 30.11 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 840QM +
min: 728     avg: 734     median: 737 (3%)     max: 738 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 840QM +
54820 MIPS (26%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 840QM +
38190 MFLOPS (29%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 840QM +
7.2 Points (92%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 840QM +
min: 12224     avg: 14498     median: 12238 (11%)     max: 19033 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 840QM +
4686 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 8790     avg: 10063     median: 9926 (8%)     max: 11472 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
776 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 768     avg: 831     median: 781 (9%)     max: 945 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
134 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
375 Points (1%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 549     avg: 636     median: 636 (6%)     max: 723 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1553     avg: 1781     median: 1781 (2%)     max: 2009 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 12550     avg: 14061     median: 14060.5 (16%)     max: 15571 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 2972     avg: 3261     median: 3261 (3%)     max: 3550 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 33452     avg: 37816     median: 37815.5 (13%)     max: 42179 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 4042     avg: 4277     median: 4276.5 (13%)     max: 4511 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 13724     avg: 15979     median: 15979 (20%)     max: 18234 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 2431     avg: 2672     median: 2671.5 (1%)     max: 2912 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 19354     avg: 21013     median: 21013 (13%)     max: 22672 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 39551     avg: 43893     median: 43892.5 (8%)     max: 48234 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
2133 Points (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
1923 Points (4%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 3071     avg: 3328     median: 3424 (22%)     max: 3489 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
4576 Points (23%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-840QM → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 26. 07:49:15

#0 checking url part for id 975 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 840 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8109 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.092s ... 0.093s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.093s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 975 +0.003s ... 0.096s

#8 got single benchmarks 975 +0.018s ... 0.114s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 840 +0.003s ... 0.117s

#10 got single benchmarks 840 +0s ... 0.117s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 8109 +0.003s ... 0.12s

#12 got single benchmarks 8109 +0.016s ... 0.136s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.136s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.102s ... 0.238s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.238s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)