, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core i3-4000M vs Intel Core i3-4020Y

Intel Core i3-4000M

► remove from comparison Intel 4000M

The Intel Core i3-4000M is a middle-class dual-core processor for laptops launched in Q2 2013. It is based on the Haswell architecture and is manufactured in 22nm. Due to Hyper-Threading, the two cores can handle up to four threads in parallel leading to better utilization of the CPU. Each core offers a base speed of 2.4 GHz and includes no Turbo Boost support.

Haswell is the successor to the Ivy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm and offer an optimized branch prediction as well as additional execution ports. Furthermore, new features like AVX2 and FMA should increase the performance in future applications.

Due to these changes, the performance per clock has been improved by almost 10 percent compared to Ivy Bridge. Therefore, the i3-4000M is about as fast as the former Sandy Bridge model i5-2410M.

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 4600 offers 20 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 400 MHz up to 1100 MHz with Turbo Boost, making it about 30 % faster than a similarly clocked HD 4000.

The i3-4000M is rated at a TDP of 37 W including the graphics card, memory controller and VRMs. Therefore, the CPU is suited for laptops 14-inches or greater.

Intel Core i3-4020Y

► remove from comparison Intel 4020Y

The Intel Core i3-4020Y is an ULV (ultra low voltage) dual-core processor for ultrabooks and tablets which has been presented in Q3/2013. It is based on the Haswell architecture and manufactured in 22nm. Due to Hyperthreading, the two cores can handle up to four threads in parallel, leading to better utilization of the CPU. Each core offers a base speed of 1.5 GHz (no Turbo Boost support).

Haswell is the successor to the Ivy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm and offer an optimized branch prediction as well as additional execution ports, improving the performance per clock by almost 10 percent. Furthermore, new features like AVX2 and FMA should increase the performance in future applications.

The performance of the Core i3-4020Y is about 10 - 15 percent higher compared to the Ivy Bridge based Core i3-3229Y. When using new instructions such as AVX2, the performance can be even better. Thus, the CPU has sufficient power for office and multimedia purposes as well as most applications.

The integrated HD Graphics 4200 offers 20 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 200 - 850 MHz (with Turbo Boost), making it somewhat faster than the former HD Graphics 4000 (at similar clocks). However, the HD 4200 is significantly slower than the HD 5000 of other ULV models (with a higher TDP).

The i3-4020Y is rated at a TDP of 11.5 watts (SDP 6 watts) including graphics card, memory controller, VRMs and the integrated chipset.  Therefore, the CPU is suited for very small ultrabooks or tablets, but usually still needs active cooling.

Intel Core i3-4000MIntel Core i3-4020Y
Intel Core i3Intel Core i3
HaswellHaswell
Series: Core i3 Haswell
Intel Core i3-4110M compare2.6 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4100M compare2.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i3-4000M2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4100E compare2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4158U compare2 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4120U compare2 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4030U compare1.9 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4025U compare1.9 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4100U compare1.8 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4010U compare1.7 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4005U compare1.7 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4102E compare1.6 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4030Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4020Y1.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4012Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4010Y compare1.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4110M compare2.6 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4100M compare2.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4000M2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4100E compare2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4158U compare2 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4120U compare2 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4030U compare1.9 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4025U compare1.9 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4100U compare1.8 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4010U compare1.7 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4005U compare1.7 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4102E compare1.6 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4030Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i3-4020Y1.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4012Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4010Y compare1.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
2400 MHz1500 MHz
128 KB128 KB
512 KB512 KB
3 MB3 MB
2 / 42 / 4
37 11.5
960
22 22
130 mm2
100 °C100 °C
rPGAFCBGA1168
HD Graphics 4600 (400 - 1100 MHz), DDR3(L)-1600 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, VirtualizationHD Graphics 4200 (200 - 850 MHz), DDR3(L)-1600 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 4600 (400 - 1100 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 4200 (200 - 850 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$225 U.S.$304 U.S.
Intel Core i3 4000MIntel Core i3 4020Y

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 236     avg: 240     median: 240 (2%)     max: 243 Points
152 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 91     avg: 94.2     median: 95 (35%)     max: 96 Points
60 Points (22%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.55     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (5%)     max: 2.62 Points
min: 1.54     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (3%)     max: 1.63 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (34%)     max: 1.08 Points
min: 0.62     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (21%)     max: 0.67 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3542     avg: 3570     median: 3581 (32%)     max: 3588
min: 1001     avg: 1621     median: 1621 (14%)     max: 2241
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 7994     avg: 8049     median: 8042 (13%)     max: 8111
min: 4495     avg: 4750     median: 4749.5 (8%)     max: 5004
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 10239     avg: 10315     median: 10329 (10%)     max: 10361 Points
min: 4701     avg: 5602     median: 5602 (5%)     max: 6503 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 4651     avg: 4662     median: 4664 (33%)     max: 4669 Points
min: 2615     avg: 2778     median: 2777.5 (20%)     max: 2940 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 631.457     avg: 649     median: 635.2 (8%)     max: 681.783 s
1118 s (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 19.907     avg: 20.6     median: 20 (4%)     max: 21.997 s
35.3 s (7%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 4020Y +
1768 (11%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 15     avg: 15.2     median: 15.2 (7%)     max: 15.3 fps
9.6 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 78     avg: 79.1     median: 79.1 (23%)     max: 80.2 fps
52.2 fps (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 4020Y +
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 4020Y +
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 4020Y +
0.9 GB/s (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 4000M +
3098 Points (17%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 15.784     avg: 16     median: 16 (3%)     max: 16.099 s
min: 24     avg: 24.4     median: 24.4 (5%)     max: 24.805 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 35.793     avg: 35.8     median: 35.8 (2%)     max: 35.844 s
min: 54.911     avg: 55     median: 55 (2%)     max: 55 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 799.032     avg: 808     median: 802.1 (4%)     max: 823.556 s
min: 1220     avg: 1220     median: 1220.3 (5%)     max: 1220.65 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
41500 MIPS (20%)
26130 MIPS (12%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
31000 MFLOPS (24%)
19330 MFLOPS (15%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 4000M +
6.9 Points (88%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 4000M +
min: 8115     avg: 8398     median: 8398 (10%)     max: 8681 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3054     avg: 3176     median: 3161 (12%)     max: 3304 Points
min: 1908     avg: 2061     median: 2061 (8%)     max: 2214 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 25742     avg: 28030     median: 27649 (18%)     max: 30127 Points
min: 16987     avg: 17518     median: 17517.5 (11%)     max: 18048 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2404     avg: 2484     median: 2496 (6%)     max: 2525 Points
min: 1501     avg: 1536     median: 1536 (4%)     max: 1571 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3405     avg: 3491     median: 3526 (9%)     max: 3576 Points
min: 1793     avg: 1977     median: 1977 (5%)     max: 2161 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 4020Y +
5319 Points (43%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 4020Y +
4168 Points (38%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 4020Y +
3475 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 4020Y +
3075 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 4020Y +
3658 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
4298 (8%)
min: 2952     avg: 3140     median: 3140 (6%)     max: 3328
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2024 (42%)
min: 1481     avg: 1526     median: 1525.5 (31%)     max: 1570

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-4000M → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-4020Y → 70% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 22. 12:55:34

#0 checking url part for id 4216 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4572 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:09:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.011s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.012s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4216 +0s ... 0.012s

#7 got single benchmarks 4216 +0.014s ... 0.026s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 4572 +0s ... 0.026s

#9 got single benchmarks 4572 +0.009s ... 0.035s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.035s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.019s ... 0.054s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.058s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)