The Core 2 Duo SP9300 is a power efficient (25W TDP) dual core CPU for laptops. Compared to other Core 2 Duo with 2.26 GHz, the SP9300 features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the Penryn core. Usually 3MB are enabled for 25 W CPUs at this clock range (e.g. P8400). Therefore, the performance is a bit better than similar clocked C2D CPUs.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 is a mid-range dual-core processor for laptops from 2008. It is based on the Penryn core and offers all functions that were available at that time (e.g. Virtualization VT-x).
The Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock rate of 2.1 GHz. Compared to the Core 2 Duo T6500, the T6570 offers Virtualization VT-x and is therefore aimed at business notebooks.
The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6570.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 → 100%n=10
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 → 97%n=10
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 → 96%n=10
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.27
log 14. 15:42:42
#0 checking url part for id 421 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 380 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 466 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:33:43 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.03s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 421 +0.003s ... 0.034s
#8 got single benchmarks 421 +0.015s ... 0.049s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 380 +0.003s ... 0.052s
#10 got single benchmarks 380 +0.039s ... 0.091s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 466 +0.003s ... 0.093s
#12 got single benchmarks 466 +0.017s ... 0.111s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.111s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.15s ... 0.261s