Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-8500 vs Intel Core i3-8109U

Intel Core i5-8500

► remove from comparison Intel i5-8500

The Intel Core i5-8500 is a mid-range 6-core CPU. The processor belongs to the Coffee Lake generation and was presented in April 2018. It does not support Hyper-Threading, which means it can run six threads simultaneously. The base clock rate is 3 GHz and the CPU can speed up to 4.1 GHz under high load. Despite belonging to the new generation of CPUs, the Core i5-8500 is manufactured in an improved 14nm process.

Performance

The processor offers a strong performance increase compared to the Core i5-7500 due to its two additional cores. Single-core performance has not improved significantly compared to its Kaby Lake predecessor. As a mid-range model, the Core i5-8500 should be suitable for demanding games and programs.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50-100 MHz. The build is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 65 watts. Therefore, well-dimensioned cooling systems should easily manage to deal with the created heat. We expect increased efficiency due to the higher performance.

Intel Core i3-8109U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i3-8109U is a dual-core SoC for notebooks based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in April 2018. Compared to its predecessor Core i3-7167U, the CPU now supports Turbo boost with up to 3.6 GHz. Thanks to Hyperthreading the CPU can execute up to 4 threads simultaneously. It is also equipped with an Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 GPU with 128 MB eDRAM (but with 300 - 1050 MHz it is the slowest Iris Plus), a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm++ process (3rd generation) with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Thanks to the Turbo Boost, the processor performance should be a bit above the old Core i7-7500U (max. 3.5 GHz, 15 Watt). Therefore the Core i3-8109U should be fine for most applications. Some games however already need four real cores for optimal performance (paired with a dedicated GPU e.g.).

Graphics

The integrated Intel Iris Plus 655 Graphics is the GT3e model of the Kaby Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9.5). It has 48 Execution Units running at 300-1050 MHz  and the performance is comparable to a GeForce 930M or 940MX thanks to fast eDRAM cache. However, there aren't any significant improvements compared to the old Iris Plus 650, so modern games can often not be played smoothly or only at the lowest or medium settings, respectively.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process (14nm++, 3rd generation of 14nm) with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel specifies the TDP with 28 Watts, which can be reduced to 23 Watts (cTDP Down) depending on the usage scenario. The TDP is pretty high compared to the common 15-Watt TDP for quad-core processors, but allows a better utilization of CPU and GPU Turbo.

ModelIntel Core i5-8500Intel Core i3-8109U
CodenameCoffee Lake-SCoffee Lake-U
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-U
Intel Core i7-8086K compare3.7 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700K compare3.7 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700 compare3.2 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8600K compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500 « 3 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400 compare2.8 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500T compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8559U compare2.7 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8557U compare1.7 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8269U compare2.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8279U compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8259U compare2.3 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8257U compare1.4 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8109U « 3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock3000 - 4100 MHz3000 - 3600 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB128 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB512 KB
L3 Cache9 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 62 / 4
TDP65 Watt28 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFCLGA1151FCBGA1528
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE 4.2
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1100 MHz)Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (300 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$202 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-8109U
24.1 pt (40%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
2004 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
906 Points (38%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
351 Points (38%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
772 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
950 Points (6%)
min: 324     avg: 352.5     median: 352.5 (2%)     max: 381 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
172 Points (48%)
min: 124.3     avg: 138.7     median: 138.7 (38%)     max: 153 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 i5-8500 +
10.2 Points (13%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 i5-8500 +
2 Points (47%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 i5-8500 +
8606 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 i5-8500 +
40829 Points (30%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 i5-8500 +
39357 Points (25%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 i5-8500 +
8515 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 i5-8500 +
848 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 i5-8500 +
26.5 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 i5-8500 +
4219 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
23200 MIPS (13%)
9489 MIPS (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4513 MIPS (53%)
3752 MIPS (44%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 i5-8500 +
206.5 fps (48%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
7.9 fps (14%)
2.9 fps (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 i5-8500 +
0.5 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 i5-8500 +
0.9 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 i5-8500 +
5 GB/s (13%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
494.8 Seconds (3%)
1328 Seconds (9%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.9 sec (19%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 i5-8500 +
9903 Points (21%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 i5-8500 +
9.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 i5-8500 +
20.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 i5-8500 +
541 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
7942 Points (20%)
4921 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
7782 Points (20%)
3604 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
11691 Points (21%)
5138 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1932     avg: 2134     median: 2134 (9%)     max: 2336 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
888 Points (35%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
1880 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4540 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
8974 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i5-8500 +
4782 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i5-8500 +
18025 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1199 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
131.3 Points (24%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
35.9 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
32.4 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
10 Points per Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8500 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-8109U → 52% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 31. 01:54:28

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11246 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10066 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753919667s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:17:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11246 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 11246 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10066 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 10066 +0.004s ... 0.018s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.024s ... 0.042s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.044s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)