Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-L13G4 vs Intel Core i5-L16G7

Intel Core i3-L13G4

► remove from comparison Intel i3-L13G4

The Core i3-L13G4 is an SoC with 5 processor cores based on the Lakefield architecture. It uses one fast Sunny Cove core (known from Ice Lake CPUs but without AVX512) with up to 2.8 GHz and 4 small Tremont cores (Atom / Celeron). Using all 5 cores, the CPU can reach up to 1.3 GHz, base clock speed is 0.8 GHz. The CPU does not support HyperThreading / SMT (= 5 threads max). The rest of the SoC is similar to the Ice Lake chips, like the Gen 11 graphics adapter with 48 EUs (similar to the Iris Plus G4 but only clocked at 500 MHz and using the UHD Graphics name).

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the L13G4 as of August 2023, we have tested a certain number of laptops powered by the Core i5-L16G7, a processor that's just a bit faster than the L13G4 (5 cores, 5 threads, up to 3.0 GHz). Based on that, expect the L13G4 to be 5% to 10% slower than the Pentium N6000 and the Core i3-1110G4, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Needless to say, this kind of performance is only sufficient for basic day-to-day activities as of late 2023.

With a specified TDP of 7 Watt (PL1, 9.5 Watt PL2), the CPU is well suited for thin and light laptops and Windows based tablets. / 2-in-1. Intel claims that the standby power was greatly reduced (91% better compared to the i7-8500Y with 2.5 mW). The SoC is manufactured in 10nm and uses the Intel Foveros 3D Packaging technology. Foveros is used to stack the in 22FFL manufactured I/O die, the compute die in 10nm and up to 8 GB LPDDR4X-4267.

Intel Core i5-L16G7

► remove from comparison Intel i5-L16G7

The Core i5-L16G7 is an SoC with 5 processor cores based on the Lakefield architecture. It uses one fast Sunny Cove core (known from Ice-Lake CPUs but without AVX512) with up to 3 GHz and 4 small Tremont cores (Atom / Celeron) with up to 2.8 GHz. Using all 5 cores, the CPU can reach up to 1.8 GHz, base clock speed is 1.4 GHz. The CPU does not support HyperThreading / SMT. The rest of the SoC is similar to the Ice Lake chips, like the Gen 11 graphics card with 64 EUs (similar to the Iris Plus G7 but only clocked at 500 MHz and using the UHD Graphics name).

Performance

The average L16G7 in our database is in the same league as the Pentium N6000 and also the Core i3-1110G4, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This kind of performance is only sufficient for basic day-to-day activities as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the CPU power limits are.

With a specified TDP of 7 Watt (PL1, 9.5 Watt PL2), the CPU is well suited for thin and light laptops and Windows based tablets. / 2-in-1. Intel claims that the standby power was greatly reduced (91% better compared to the i7-8500Y with 2.5 mW). The SoC is manufactured in 10nm and uses the Intel Foveros 3D Packaging technology. Foveros is used to stack the in 22FFL manufactured I/O die, the compute die in 10nm and up to 8 GB LPDDR4X-4267.

ModelIntel Core i3-L13G4Intel Core i5-L16G7
SeriesIntel LakefieldIntel Lakefield
CodenameLakefieldLakefield
Series: Lakefield Lakefield
Intel Core i5-L16G71.4 - 3 GHz5 / 5 cores
Intel Core i3-L13G4 « 0.8 - 2.8 GHz5 / 5 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-L16G7 « 1.4 - 3 GHz5 / 5 cores
Intel Core i3-L13G40.8 - 2.8 GHz5 / 5 cores4 MB L3
Clock800 - 2800 MHz1400 - 3000 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB
Cores / Threads5 / 55 / 5
TDP10 Watt7 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketCSP1016CSP1016
FeaturesLPDDR4x-4267 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHALPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) (200 - 500 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) (200 - 500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$281 U.S.$281 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-L16G7
21.1 pt (29%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
1810 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
710 Points (30%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 276     avg: 282.5     median: 282.5 (31%)     max: 289 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 609     avg: 648     median: 647.5 (2%)     max: 686 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
255 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 88.3     avg: 89.5     median: 89.5 (27%)     max: 90.7 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3.2 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.4 Points (35%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4079 Points (25%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
9003 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
879 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
28.6 s (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 7230     avg: 7587     median: 7586.5 (4%)     max: 7943 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3174     avg: 3211     median: 3211 (38%)     max: 3248 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.44     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (3%)     max: 1.48 fps
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1897     avg: 2027     median: 2026.5 (14%)     max: 2156 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.897     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (20%)     max: 0.987 sec
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.7 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
25.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
622 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2926     avg: 3015     median: 3015 (8%)     max: 3104 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
26353 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
26635 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
32705 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2831     avg: 2834     median: 2834 (7%)     max: 2837 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 4138     avg: 4306     median: 4305.5 (8%)     max: 4473 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1148 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
816 Points (34%)
min: 797     avg: 827     median: 826.5 (35%)     max: 856 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1349 Points (2%)
min: 1441     avg: 1634     median: 1633.5 (3%)     max: 1826 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1252     avg: 1278     median: 1277.5 (1%)     max: 1303 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 31228     avg: 32455     median: 32455 (29%)     max: 33682 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 121     avg: 124.5     median: 124.5 (26%)     max: 128 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-L13G4 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-L16G7 → 111% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 24. 00:45:00

#0 checking url part for id 12250 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12215 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:40:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.021s ... 0.022s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12250 +0.003s ... 0.025s

#7 got single benchmarks 12250 +0.006s ... 0.031s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12215 +0.018s ... 0.048s

#9 got single benchmarks 12215 +0.01s ... 0.058s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.058s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.117s ... 0.175s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.201s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)