Intel Atom Z3735F vs Intel Atom Z3735D vs Intel Atom Z3770

Intel Atom Z3735F

► remove Intel Z3735F

The Intel Atom Z3735F is a power-efficient quad-core SoC for tablets (mainly Android). It is clocked at 1.33 - 1.83 GHz and is part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22nm low-power design process (P1271) with Tri-Gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. In contrast to the Z3735D, the Z3735F comes in a different BGA package.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, and enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major additions are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and the improved performance per clock, the Z3735F is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms like the Z2760. Depending on the benchmark, the Z3735F competes with AMDs Temash and Kabini APUs like the A6-1450 and A4-5000. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games. Compared to ARM SoCs for Android systems, the Z3735F is placed in the upper mid-range segment.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 646 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games (like simple Android titles) will run fluently. However, video acceleration and other multimedia applications are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2.2 W, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 W. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3735D

► remove Intel Z3735D

The Intel Atom Z3735D is a power-efficient quad-core SoC for tablets (mainly Android). It is clocked at 1.33 - 1.83 GHz and is part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22nm low-power design process (P1271) with Tri-Gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. In contrast to the Z3745D, the Z3735D offers a somewhat lower GPU clock rate.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, and enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major additions are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and the improved performance per clock, the Z3735D is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms like the Z2760. Depending on the benchmark, the Z3735D competes with AMDs Temash and Kabini APUs like the A6-1450 and A4-5000. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games. Compared to ARM SoCs for Android systems, the Z3735D is placed in the upper mid-range segment.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 646 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games (like simple Android titles) will run fluently. However, video acceleration and other multimedia applications are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2.2 W, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 W. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3770

► remove Intel Z3770

The Intel Atom Z3770 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android tablets. It is clocked at 1.46 - 2.4 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and a clock speed of 1.46 - 2.4 GHz, the Z3770 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the Z2760. In our benchmarks, the Z3770 even slightly beats the Kabini APU AMD A4-5000, as well as ARM SoCs like Tegra 4 and the Snapdragon 800. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 667 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) and comparable to the Qualcomm Adreno 320 (as found in the Snapdragon 600). Therefore, only older and less demanding Windows games will run fluently. However, video acceleration and display resolutions up to 2560 x 1600 pixels are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3735FIntel Atom Z3735DIntel Atom Z3770
Intel AtomIntel AtomIntel Atom
Bay Trail-TBay Trail-TBay Trail-T
: Atom Bay Trail-T
Intel Atom Z37951590 - 2390 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37851490 - 2410 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37751460 - 2390 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775D1490 - 2410 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37701460 - 2400 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770D1500 - 2410 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736F1330 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736G1330 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37451330 - 1860 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745D1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37401330 - 1860 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740D1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735D1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735E1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
» Intel Atom Z3735F1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735G1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z36801330 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3680D1330 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z37951590 - 2390 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37851490 - 2410 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37751460 - 2390 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775D1490 - 2410 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37701460 - 2400 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770D1500 - 2410 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736F1330 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736G1330 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37451330 - 1860 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745D1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37401330 - 1860 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740D1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
» Intel Atom Z3735D1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735E1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735F1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735G1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z36801330 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3680D1330 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z37951590 - 2390 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37851490 - 2410 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37751460 - 2390 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775D1490 - 2410 MHz4 / 4
» Intel Atom Z37701460 - 2400 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770D1500 - 2410 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736F1330 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736G1330 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37451330 - 1860 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745D1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37401330 - 1860 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740D1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735D1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735E1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735F1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735G1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z36801330 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3680D1330 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
1330 - 1830 MHz1330 - 1830 MHz1460 - 2400 MHz
224 KB224 KB224 KB
2 MB2 MB2 MB
4 / 44 / 44 / 4
<4 <4 <4
22 22 22
UTFCBGA592UTFCBGA1380UTFCBGA1380
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 646 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 2 GB Single-Channel DDR3L-RS 1333, Quick SyncIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 646 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 2 GB Single-Channel DDR3L-RS 1333, Quick SyncIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 311 - 667 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 4 GB Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1067
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 646 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 646 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 667 MHz)
$17 U.S.$37 U.S.
Intel Atom Z3735FIntel Atom Z3735DIntel Atom Z3770

Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
min: 0     avg: 0.9 (2%)     max: 1 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
0.3 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
min: 696     avg: 957.3     median: 945 (10%)     max: 1829 Points
min: 744     avg: 851     median: 851 (9%)     max: 958 Points
min: 997     avg: 1157.6     median: 1189 (12%)     max: 1230 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
min: 822     avg: 2699.3     median: 2885 (4%)     max: 2935 Points
min: 2514     avg: 2726     median: 2726 (4%)     max: 2938 Points
min: 2848     avg: 3690.5     median: 3961 (6%)     max: 4035 Points
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
min: 1079     avg: 1114.7     median: 1099 (13%)     max: 1165 seconds
1164.7 seconds (14%)
min: 836     avg: 921.8     median: 862 (10%)     max: 1126 seconds
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
min: 34     avg: 35.6     median: 35 (7%)     max: 36 seconds
37.2 seconds (7%)
min: 24     avg: 25.9     median: 26 (5%)     max: 26 seconds
WinRAR - Result
min: 1595     avg: 1635     median: 1635 (19%)     max: 1675 KB/s
1669 KB/s (20%)
898 KB/s (11%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
6.8 fps (4%)
6.8 fps (4%)
min: 6     avg: 7.8     median: 7 (4%)     max: 9 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
min: 34     avg: 35.6     median: 35 (12%)     max: 36 fps
35.1 fps (12%)
min: 31     avg: 39.3     median: 40 (14%)     max: 45 fps
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.4 GB/s (18%)
0.1 GB/s (5%)
0.1 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (4%)
0.1 GB/s (5%)
0.2 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
0.6 GB/s (3%)
0.6 GB/s (3%)
0.8 GB/s (4%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 856     avg: 1164     median: 1164 (8%)     max: 1472 Points
min: 2203     avg: 2212     median: 2212 (15%)     max: 2221 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 27     avg: 36.1     median: 27 (6%)     max: 53 Seconds
92 Seconds (20%)
min: 27     avg: 33.3     median: 36 (8%)     max: 37 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 61     avg: 79.1     median: 61 (3%)     max: 114 Seconds
176.3 Seconds (8%)
min: 61     avg: 74     median: 80 (3%)     max: 81 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1566     avg: 1747     median: 1566 (7%)     max: 2108 Seconds
3458.4 Seconds (15%)
min: 1566     avg: 1685.7     median: 1735 (8%)     max: 1756 Seconds
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 15     avg: 7984.3     median: 7984 (4%)     max: 15953 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 7     avg: 3730.7     median: 3730 (3%)     max: 7454 MFLOPS
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
min: 3379     avg: 4056.5     median: 4056 (6%)     max: 4734 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
min: 745     avg: 1135.1     median: 1190 (6%)     max: 1207 points
min: 1199     avg: 1202     median: 1202 (6%)     max: 1205 points
min: 1199     avg: 1352.6     median: 1330 (7%)     max: 1512 points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 11887     avg: 12817.1     median: 12912 (8%)     max: 13499 Points
min: 13200     avg: 13403     median: 13403 (9%)     max: 13606 Points
min: 11561     avg: 16054     median: 17754 (11%)     max: 18706 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080
min: 11980     avg: 12961.3     median: 12748 (15%)     max: 14156 Points
min: 17931     avg: 18729.3     median: 18754 (22%)     max: 19503 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
min: 12499     avg: 14777.8     median: 15281 (18%)     max: 16050 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 853     avg: 1032.9     median: 1056 (3%)     max: 1084 Points
min: 1041     avg: 1055     median: 1055 (3%)     max: 1069 Points
min: 956     avg: 1315.6     median: 1471 (4%)     max: 1555 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
1504 Points (5%)
min: 1348     avg: 1748     median: 1748 (5%)     max: 2148 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
min: 2139     avg: 2243.5     median: 2243 (18%)     max: 2348 Points
2303 Points (19%)
min: 2472     avg: 2522.5     median: 2522 (20%)     max: 2573 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
min: 1877     avg: 1956.5     median: 1956 (18%)     max: 2036 Points
2014 Points (18%)
min: 2278     avg: 2357.5     median: 2357 (21%)     max: 2437 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
min: 2059     avg: 2161     median: 2161 (4%)     max: 2263 Points
2247 Points (4%)
min: 3092     avg: 3110     median: 3110 (5%)     max: 3128 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
min: 2338     avg: 2477     median: 2477 (4%)     max: 2616 Points
2620 Points (5%)
min: 3617     avg: 3637     median: 3637 (6%)     max: 3657 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
min: 2128     avg: 2238.5     median: 2238 (5%)     max: 2349 Points
2336 Points (5%)
min: 3063     avg: 3084.5     median: 3084 (7%)     max: 3106 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 2018     avg: 2166.1     median: 2191 (3%)     max: 2213 Points
min: 2138     avg: 2167.5     median: 2167 (3%)     max: 2197 Points
min: 2998     avg: 3035     median: 3035 (4%)     max: 3072 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 767     avg: 785     median: 786 (16%)     max: 801 Points
min: 782     avg: 782.5     median: 782 (16%)     max: 783 Points
min: 977     avg: 980.5     median: 980 (20%)     max: 984 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Multi Thread
300 MFLOPS (10%)
717 MFLOPS (24%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Single Thread
145 MFLOPS (14%)
265 MFLOPS (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
min: 5410     avg: 7761.3     median: 8831 (15%)     max: 9362 ms
min: 8844     avg: 9010.7     median: 9010 (15%)     max: 9177 ms
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
min: 442     avg: 634.5     median: 510 (6%)     max: 923 ms
min: 489     avg: 490.4     median: 490 (5%)     max: 491 ms
566.6 ms (6%)
Sunspider - 0.9.1 Total Score *
577.3 ms (5%)
Octane V2 - Total Score
min: 3067     avg: 4538.6     median: 3524 (7%)     max: 6457 Points
min: 3479     avg: 3509     median: 3509 (7%)     max: 3539 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Metal
1221 Points (33%)
Vellamo 3.x - Multicore Beta
1379 Points (31%)
Vellamo 3.x - Browser
3069 Points (41%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0
22792 points (53%)
AnTuTu v4 - Total Score
36357 (85%)
AnTuTu v5 - Total Score
min: 32624     avg: 33917     median: 33917 (34%)     max: 35210 Points
AndEBench - Java
428 Iter./s (13%)
AndEBench - Native
21235 Iter./s (70%)
PCMark for Android - Work performance score
5281 Points (27%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z3735F → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z3735D → 99%

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z3770 → 122%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)