Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom Z3735F vs Intel Atom Z3770

Intel Atom Z3735F

► remove from comparison Intel Z3735F

The Intel Atom Z3735F is a power-efficient quad-core SoC for tablets (mainly Android). It is clocked at 1.33 - 1.83 GHz and is part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22nm low-power design process (P1271) with Tri-Gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. In contrast to the Z3735D, the Z3735F comes in a different BGA package.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, and enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major additions are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and the improved performance per clock, the Z3735F is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms like the Z2760. Depending on the benchmark, the Z3735F competes with AMDs Temash and Kabini APUs like the A6-1450 and A4-5000. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games. Compared to ARM SoCs for Android systems, the Z3735F is placed in the upper mid-range segment.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 646 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games (like simple Android titles) will run fluently. However, video acceleration and other multimedia applications are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2.2 W, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 W. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3770

► remove from comparison Intel Z3770

The Intel Atom Z3770 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android tablets. It is clocked at 1.46 - 2.4 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and a clock speed of 1.46 - 2.4 GHz, the Z3770 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the Z2760. In our benchmarks, the Z3770 even slightly beats the Kabini APU AMD A4-5000, as well as ARM SoCs like Tegra 4 and the Snapdragon 800. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 667 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) and comparable to the Qualcomm Adreno 320 (as found in the Snapdragon 600). Therefore, only older and less demanding Windows games will run fluently. However, video acceleration and display resolutions up to 2560 x 1600 pixels are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

ModelIntel Atom Z3735FIntel Atom Z3770
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Atom
CodenameBay Trail-TBay Trail-T
Series: Atom Bay Trail-T
Intel Atom Z3795 compare1.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3785 compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3775 compare1.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3775D compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37701.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3770D compare1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3736F compare1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3736G compare1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3745 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3745D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3740 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3740D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735E compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735F « 1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735G compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3680 compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z3680D compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z3795 compare1.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3785 compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3775 compare1.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3775D compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3770 « 1.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3770D compare1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3736F compare1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3736G compare1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3745 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3745D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3740 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3740D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735E compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735F1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735G compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3680 compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z3680D compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1330 - 1830 MHz1460 - 2400 MHz
L1 Cache224 KB224 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
TDP<4 Watt<4 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm
SocketUTFCBGA592UTFCBGA1380
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 646 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 2 GB Single-Channel DDR3L-RS 1333, Quick SyncIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 311 - 667 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 4 GB Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1067
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 646 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 667 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$17 U.S.$37 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 Z3735F +
min: 0.72     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (1%)     max: 1.07 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 Z3735F +
min: 0.27     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (8%)     max: 0.31 Points
min: 997     avg: 1158     median: 1189 (7%)     max: 1230 Points
min: 2848     avg: 3691     median: 3961 (3%)     max: 4035 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1079     avg: 1115     median: 1100 (13%)     max: 1165 s
min: 837     avg: 922     median: 862.5 (10%)     max: 1126 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 34.33     avg: 35.6     median: 35.7 (7%)     max: 36.89 s
min: 24     avg: 25.9     median: 26.6 (5%)     max: 26.6 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1595     avg: 1635     median: 1635 (3%)     max: 1675 Points
898 Points (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 6.79     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (2%)     max: 6.83 fps
min: 6.2     avg: 7.8     median: 7.7 (3%)     max: 9.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 34.95     avg: 35.6     median: 35.9 (8%)     max: 36.06 fps
min: 31.5     avg: 39.3     median: 40.5 (9%)     max: 45.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.0857     avg: 0.3     median: 0.1 (3%)     max: 0.876 GB/s
min: 0.077     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (4%)     max: 0.123 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.133     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (2%)     max: 0.136 GB/s
min: 0.12     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (3%)     max: 0.193 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 0.612     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (2%)     max: 0.622 GB/s
min: 0.44     avg: 0.8     median: 0.9 (2%)     max: 0.886 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 856     avg: 1164     median: 1164 (2%)     max: 1472 Points
min: 2203     avg: 2212     median: 2212 (5%)     max: 2221 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 27.45     avg: 36.1     median: 27.5 (6%)     max: 53.3 s
min: 27     avg: 33.3     median: 36 (8%)     max: 37 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 61.2     avg: 79.1     median: 61.2 (3%)     max: 114.9 s
min: 61     avg: 74     median: 80 (3%)     max: 81 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1566     avg: 1747     median: 1566 (7%)     max: 2109 s
min: 1566     avg: 1686     median: 1735 (8%)     max: 1756 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 15.66     avg: 7984     median: 7984.3 (4%)     max: 15953 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 7.38     avg: 3731     median: 3730.7 (3%)     max: 7454 MFLOPS
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 3379     avg: 4057     median: 4056.5 (4%)     max: 4734 Points
min: 1199     avg: 1353     median: 1330 (4%)     max: 1512 Points
min: 11561     avg: 16054     median: 17754 (14%)     max: 18706 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 11980     avg: 12961     median: 12748 (10%)     max: 14156 Points
min: 17931     avg: 18729     median: 18754 (15%)     max: 19503 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 Z3735F +
min: 12499     avg: 14778     median: 15281 (13%)     max: 16050 Points
min: 956     avg: 1316     median: 1471 (4%)     max: 1555 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1504 Points (3%)
min: 1348     avg: 1748     median: 1748 (3%)     max: 2148 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2018     avg: 2166     median: 2191.5 (4%)     max: 2213 Points
min: 2998     avg: 3035     median: 3035 (5%)     max: 3072 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 767     avg: 785     median: 786 (15%)     max: 801 Points
min: 977     avg: 981     median: 980.5 (19%)     max: 984 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 2139     avg: 2244     median: 2243.5 (18%)     max: 2348 Points
min: 2472     avg: 2523     median: 2522.5 (20%)     max: 2573 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 1877     avg: 1957     median: 1956.5 (18%)     max: 2036 Points
min: 2278     avg: 2358     median: 2357.5 (21%)     max: 2437 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 2059     avg: 2161     median: 2161 (4%)     max: 2263 Points
min: 3092     avg: 3110     median: 3110 (6%)     max: 3128 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 2338     avg: 2477     median: 2477 (5%)     max: 2616 Points
min: 3617     avg: 3637     median: 3637 (7%)     max: 3657 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 2128     avg: 2239     median: 2238.5 (6%)     max: 2349 Points
min: 3063     avg: 3085     median: 3084.5 (8%)     max: 3106 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
300 MFLOPS (10%)
717 MFLOPS (24%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
145 MFLOPS (14%)
265 MFLOPS (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 Z3735F +
min: 5410     avg: 7761     median: 8832 (10%)     max: 9362 ms
567 ms (6%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 Z3770 +
577 ms (5%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 Z3735F +
min: 3067     avg: 4539     median: 3524 (3%)     max: 6457 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
100%
1 Z3735F +
1221 Points (33%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
100%
1 Z3735F +
1379 Points (31%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
100%
1 Z3735F +
3069 Points (41%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 Z3770 +
22792 points (53%)
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
100%
1 Z3770 +
36357 Points (85%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
100%
1 Z3735F +
min: 32624     avg: 33917     median: 33917 (34%)     max: 35210 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 Z3770 +
428 Iter./s (13%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 Z3770 +
21235 Iter./s (70%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 Z3735F +
5281 Points (26%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z3735F → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z3770 → 129% n=29

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 03:21:11

#0 checking url part for id 5966 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4470 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:37:00 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.033s ... 0.034s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.034s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 5966 +0.003s ... 0.037s

#7 got single benchmarks 5966 +0.047s ... 0.084s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 4470 +0.003s ... 0.087s

#9 got single benchmarks 4470 +0.015s ... 0.102s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.102s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.21s ... 0.312s

#12 return log +0.022s ... 0.334s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)