Vivo Y69

Specifications

Pricecompare

Reviews for the Vivo Y69

75% Vivo Y69 Review: Betting on Camera, Battered on Battery
Source: Tech PP Archive.org version
So should one by buying Vivo Y69? It’s little tricky here. The phone performs the day to day tasks well and is great from the camera perspective, but then it has one major drawback, the battery. This one feature is such a letdown, and that I am not able to recommend it unless Vivo can fix the idle battery drain. The second minor disadvantage it has is the HD screen. It’s only minor because it’s not something you cannot live without and is not a great tradeoff.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 70% performance: 70% workmanship: 75%

Vivo Y69 Quick Review: A Refreshed V5 Lite
Source: Unbox Archive.org version
Aside from the FullView-Equipped V7+, Vivo also launched the Y69: another selfie-centric phone from the Chinese brand. While it may look similar to Vivo’s previous phones, the Y69 does have a few differences, particularly with some of its features.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/10/2017

Foreign Reviews

Mở hộp Vivo Y69: Màn hình 5.5 inch HD, Android 7, giá 5.9 triệu
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Large screen; nice display; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/08/2017

Comment

ARM Mali-T860 MP2: Dual-Core version of the Mali-T860 graphics card from ARM for mostly Android based smartphones and tablets. E.g. in the Mediatek Helio P10 clocked at 700 MHz and produced in 28nm.

Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

MT6750: ARM-based octa-core SoC (4x Cortex-A53 up to 1.5 GHz + 4x Cortex-A53 up to 1 GHz) with 64-Bit support and integrated LTE Cat. 6 radio.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

5.50":

It is a very small display format for smartphones. You should by no means be mis-sighted and you will generally see very little on the screen and only have a small resolution available. In return, the device should be very small and handy.

75%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.

» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.

Similar devices from a different Manufacturer