Honor 6C Pro
Specifications
Pricecompare
Average of 18 scores (from 26 reviews)
Reviews for the Honor 6C Pro
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: RP-Online DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/10/2017
Source: Curved DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/06/2017
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/30/2017
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 57%
Source: Tuexperto ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; long battery life; decent hardware; fast fingerprint sensor. Negative: Poor cameras; poor display.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/09/2017
Source: Ridble IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 68% price: 75% display: 65% mobility: 75% workmanship: 69%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 85% display: 70% mobility: 85% workmanship: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Androidiani IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; nice cameras; compact size; beautiful design.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/09/2017
Source: Tecno Cino IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Compact size; fast fingerprint sensor; decent hardware. Negative: Poor cameras; poor display.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/09/2017
Source: Le monde numerique FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Hitek FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 90% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 50% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 70%
Source: Fredzone FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Mobi France FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Product Test RU→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 66% display: 78% mobility: 66%
Source: Helpix RU→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Yamobi RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Metal case; great built quality; fast fingerprint sensor. Negative: Poor connectivity; sim and microSD are on the same slot.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/19/2018
Source: DGL.ru RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Metal case; high autonomy; good main camera; high performance. Negative: Poor selfie camera; poor display.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/06/2017
Comment
Model:
Honor 6C Pro is a smartphone that highlights a metal unibody design, a 5.2-inch HD display, and a 13-megapixel primary camera. The Honor 6C Pro can either house two SIM cards at once, or a SIM card and the microSD card slot. The case is mostly made of aluminum on the back and feels good in the hand. Only at the top and bottom was set because of the underlying antennas on plastic. It is noticeable that the back is quite slippery in the hand. However, since the Honor 6C Pro is usually held with the fingers on the frame, this shortcoming in the operation is not significant. In terms of design, the Honor 6C Pro looks similar to the Honor 6C that was launched a few months ago. It features a metal unibody design with a fingerprint sensor on the back just below the camera module, which allows the Honor 6C Pro to be unlocked quickly. The smartphone also sports antenna lines that run along the top and bottom. The power button and volume controls can be seen on the right while the SIM tray can be seen on the left.
On the camera front, the Honor 6C Pro bears a 13-megapixel sensor with a f/2.2 aperture on the back and an 8-megapixel selfie shooter. It houses a 3000mAh battery and includes connectivity options like 4G LTE, Wi-Fi, GPS, Bluetooth, among other things. The handset measures 147.9x73.2x7.65mm and weigh 145 grams. The Honor 6C Pro runs on EMUI 5.1 based on Android 7.0 Nougat. It sports a 5.2-inch (720x1280) HD display with a 2.5D curved glass on top. The IPS screen convinces with a good picture quality and a high viewing angle stability. The display shines with sufficient brightness. Even though it is only an HD resolution display, it consumes less battery power than Full HD. Exceptionally, the Honor 6C Pro does not use a SoC from its own processor forge Hisilicon. Instead, Honor bets on the Mediatek 6750, an eight-core processor with four times 1.4 GHz and four times 1.0 GHz. For most everyday tasks, the performance is sufficient. In addition, the processor also supports games like Asphalt 8 in high details. The smartphone will be offered in a single storage variant of 32GB, which is expandable up to 128GB via a microSD card. The battery is sufficiently dimensioned with 3000 mAh, with normal use it could last a day. However, charging the battery is slower as it lacks fast charging. The built-in WLAN module on the 6C Pro features only the slower b, g and n standard. The faster ac standard in the 5-GHz band is not available with this device. Huawei and Honor's range of phone can be confusing but the Honor 6C Pro is definitely aimed at the lower mid-range users who are looking for a bang with their money.
ARM Mali-T860 MP2: Dual-Core version of the Mali-T860 graphics card from ARM for mostly Android based smartphones and tablets. E.g. in the Mediatek Helio P10 clocked at 700 MHz and produced in 28nm.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
MT6750: ARM-based octa-core SoC (4x Cortex-A53 up to 1.5 GHz + 4x Cortex-A53 up to 1 GHz) with 64-Bit support and integrated LTE Cat. 6 radio.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.20":
It is a very small display format for smartphones. You should by no means be mis-sighted and you will generally see very little on the screen and only have a small resolution available. In return, the device should be very small and handy.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.Honor:
In 2014 Huawei created the sub brand Honor and offers certain smartphone series under this name. Occasionally the products are also called Huawei Honor.
The market share of Honor products is manageable, but there are several reviews on Honor smartphones with average ratings (as of 2016).
72.22%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.