Vivo V40 SE 5G

Specifications

Price comparison

Reviews for the Vivo V40 SE 5G

76% vivo V40 SE
Source: Android Mag DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/17/2024
Rating: Total score: 76%

76% Eleganter Alltags-Begleiter
Source: Smartphone Magazin - 3/24
Single Review, , Short, Date: 07/01/2024
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 64% features: 88% display: 80% mobility: 71% workmanship: 100%

Was kann das "Alltags-Flaggschiff" für 299 Euro?
Source: Futurezone.at DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/13/2024

Vivo V40 SE
Source: A1 Blog DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/04/2024

75% He probado el Vivo V40 SE 80W, un ejemplo perfecto de lo que debe ser todo móvil de la gama media
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/04/2024
Rating: Total score: 75%

72% He probado el Vivo V40 SE 5G y me parece el móvil ideal para quien busque un diseño de alta gama en cuero vegano sin una gran inversión
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/30/2024
Rating: Total score: 72%

Vivo V40 SE 80W, análisis: la carga rápida no es lo único llamativo de este móvil de gama media
Source: Hipertextual ES→EN
Positive: Beautiful design; beautiful AMOLED 120Hz display; large RAM and ROM; quick 80W charging; affordable price. Negative: Average performance; poor cameras in low light condition; unsupported waterproof and dust avoiding; weak processor.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/02/2024

Probamos el Vivo V40 SE, un gama de entrada con una baza diferente a lo que estamos acostumbrados
Source: Hipertextual ES→EN
Positive: Elegant design; nice display; high performance; decent cameras; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/05/2024

Vivo V40 SE 5G - nem rossz ez se
Source: MobilArena HU HU→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/24/2025
Rating: price: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%

78% Vivo V40 SE recenze: stylovka z levného kraje
Source: Smartmania.cz CZ→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/25/2024
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 69% features: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 79%

Comment

Qualcomm Adreno 613: Graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 SoC. Although it is the successor to the Adreno 619 in the SD 4 Gen 1, its performance is significantly lower in the entry-level class.

Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

SD 4 Gen 2: Entry-level SoC with 8 Kryo cores (two ARM Cortex-A78 based cores with up to 2.2 GHz and 6 ARM Cortex-A55 with up to 2 GHz) and an X61 5G modem. Manufactured in 4nm at Samsung.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

6.67":

It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.

75.17%: This rating is not earth-shattering. This rating must actually be seen as average, since there are about as many devices with worse ratings as better ones. A purchase recommendation can only be seen with a lot of goodwill, unless it is about websites that generally rate strictly.

» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.

Similar devices with the Same Specs

Similar devices from a different Manufacturer

Devices with Same Screen Size and/or Weight